[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!

Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing

MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent

House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups

Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners

Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza

AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition

Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report

Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight

Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency

Stealing JFK's Body

Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence

ASHEVILLE UPDATE: Bodies Being Stacked in Warehouses & Children Being Taken Away

American news is mostly written by Israeli lobbyists pushing Zionist agenda

Biden's Missile Crisis

British Operation Kiss kill Instantly Skripals Has Failed to Kill But Succeeded at Covering Up, Almost

NASA chooses SpaceX and Blue Origin to deliver rover, astronaut base to the moon

The Female Fantasy Exposed: Why Women Love Toxic Love Stories

United States will NOT comply with the ICC arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu:

Mississippi’s GDP Beats France: A Shocking Look at Economic Policy Failures (Per Capita)

White House Refuses to Recognize US Responsibility for Escalation of Conflict in Ukraine


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: On 9/11, the U.S. Military Was Preparing for a Simulated Nuclear War
Source: 911blogger.com
URL Source: http://911blogger.com/news/2011-11- ... reparing-simulated-nuclear-war
Published: Nov 19, 2011
Author: Shoestring
Post Date: 2011-11-23 11:32:58 by GreyLmist
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: 9-11, War Games
Views: 640
Comments: 24

While September 11, 2001 is well known as the day when the U.S. suffered its worst terrorist attack, what is little known is that it was also a day when large sections of the armed forces around the nation had been preparing to fight a simulated nuclear war, as part of major training exercises being conducted at the time. In their annual exercises "Vigilant Guardian" and "Global Guardian," the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and the United States Strategic Command (Stratcom) were scheduled to carry out what has been described as a "simulated air war," a "full-blown nuclear war" exercise, a "fictional nuclear war," and a "practice Armageddon."

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

This article is very long. Am archiving the link here for the evidence that Defcon 3 is oddly the highest level of alert and readiness that was implemented that day, rather than Defcon 1 for immenent attack(s)/attack(s) in-process. This is from a post by the article author in the comments section:

It is difficult to know the reasons for Rumsfeld's actions, such as why he ordered the military to Defcon 3. At present, we can only make educated guesses. This is one of many reasons why we urgently need a new and unrestrained investigation of 9/11, to find out the full truth of what went on and who was responsible for the attacks.

I think the fact that the evidence I've presented in this article isn't already common knowledge alone proves there has been a massive cover-up of the truth about what happened on September 11.

Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: GreyLmist (#0)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 1749-1832

Eric Stratton  posted on  2011-11-23   11:43:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Eric Stratton, 4 (#1)

This makes me wonder if nukes are already in place for the next event.

Break the Conventions - Keep the Commandments - G.K.Chesterson

Lod  posted on  2011-11-23   12:28:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: GreyLmist (#0)

The Sept. 11th hijackers might have known in advance that the military was going to be preoccupied that day. I suspect that at least one or two of the hijacker pilots had some training on a serious jet, possibly a Saudi military or commercial jet, or at least getting a lot of advice from a veteran of military or commercial jets -- that's how they figured out about the transponders, the thrusters, and some other details that wouldn't be on those small planes they trained on in US-based flying schools.

Someone with military or airline connections, even foreign ones, might have been able to ferret out some advance warning of the Pentagon war games (such as "foreign defense systems should not be alarmed that on Sept 11th, US fighter planes will be all over the map"). It is even possible that some inkling of the military aircraft maneuvers would be communicated to commercial airlines, including foreign ones. If one of the hijackers had the right connection, even with a foreign (Arab) pilot, he might have been able to share that information with his accomplices.

Shoonra  posted on  2011-11-23   12:40:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Lod (#2)

Herr Salamande was all over the dirty suitcase nuke scenario at the Ron Paul and the 7 dwarfs show last night. He is in big with the AEI bloodhounds. including. The scumbag Wolfowitz. When he came on I couldn't. help but think, is he wearing those holey socks on his dirty feet......ewwwwwww.

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2011-11-23   13:12:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Shoonra (#3) (Edited)

it is even possible that some inkling of the military aircraft maneuvers would be communicated to commercial airlines

well, yes...

With the maturing and miniaturization of applicable technologies as seen in the 1980s and 1990s, interest in UAVs grew within the higher echelons of the U.S. military. In the 90s the U.S. Department of Defense began to buy UAVs from Israel. The Navy bought the Pioneer UAV, which is still in use.

Many of these Israeli and newly developed U.S. UAVs were used in the 1991 Gulf War.

Unmanned aerial vehicle wikipedia

and dont forget rabb i zakheim and his system planning corporation...

rabbi zakheim signed the september 2000 PNAC document that said PNAC needed a new pearl harbor...

shortly after that, rabbi zakheim was installed as head bookkeeper at the pentagon, and shortly after that, PNAC's new pearl harbor happened.

the day before PNAC's new pearl harbor happened, rumsfeld, another PNAC signatory, disclosed that $2.3 trillion was missing from zakheim's pentagon.

where did the money go?

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-11-23   13:51:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Lod (#2)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 1749-1832

Eric Stratton  posted on  2011-11-23   14:00:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Shoonra (#3)

What's your opinion on why our nation's alert and readiness level wasn't elevated to Defcon 1?

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2011-11-23   14:31:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Shoonra (#3)

The Sept. 11th hijackers might have known in advance that the military was going to be preoccupied that day.

I've thought the same thing. They had someone inside the defense establishment who knew some details of this military preparedness drill and tried to that to their advantage, hoping that the drill would cloud anything out of the ordinary with confusion.

Very cunning if they did have an insider.

TooConservative  posted on  2011-11-23   17:06:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: TooConservative (#8)

What's your opinion on why our nation's alert and readiness level wasn't elevated to Defcon 1?

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2011-11-23   17:28:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: TooConservative (#8)

The hijackers wouldn't have required much of an insider. Presumably, to avoid panicky reactions, the Pentagon would have made sure that commercial airlines flying in/to the US and foreign defense agencies knew in advance that all that military jet activity was just war games. So, I would suppose, anyone in the right spot - not even terribly high up - in a commercial airline (even a foreign one) or a foreign defense agency would know and could have told the hijackers. Didn't require one of the "nomenclatura" to convey this information.

Shoonra  posted on  2011-11-23   23:29:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: GreyLmist (#9)

What's your opinion on why our nation's alert and readiness level wasn't elevated to Defcon 1?

I've no idea. The problem with stories like this is that they have a complicated timeline and we can have no confidence that we ever got the entire truth out of the 9/11 Commission.

TooConservative  posted on  2011-11-24   9:45:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Shoonra (#10)

So, I would suppose, anyone in the right spot - not even terribly high up - in a commercial airline (even a foreign one) or a foreign defense agency would know and could have told the hijackers.

Our military works with a lot of foreign military at the higher ranks, often for decades. This would be my first suspicion. For instance, the Luftwaffe still flies and trains out of the Southwest. And we train Saudis and others as military pilots as well, part of the total package which is value-added component of our sales of military jets to those countries. I think the small Gulf oil states participate in this as well.

My first suspects would be high-ranking Saudi military or mid-level Saudi pilot trainees since 15 of 19 hijackers were Saudis.

TooConservative  posted on  2011-11-24   9:49:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: TooConservative (#12) (Edited)

My first suspects would be high-ranking Saudi military or mid- level Saudi pilot trainees since 15 of 19 hijackers were Saudis.

you'd certainly never suspect a rabbi who signed the PNAC document that said he and his buddies needed a new pearl harbor, was the CEO of a company that made remote controls for aircraft, and moved from that job to a job as head accountant at the pentagon, from which 2 trillion dollars disappeared.

how very convenient that we were informed of the missing money the day before 9/11, seeing as how 9/11 eclipsed the news of the pentagon's lost money.

a masterpiece of timing... very lucky for rabbi zakheim and mr rumsfeld, both of whom are PNAC members.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-11-24   9:58:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: TooConservative (#12)

15 of 19 hijackers were Saudis.

You'll notice that the yearbook photo montage of the "19 hijacker" hasn't been flashed on screens for many years. We didn't even get a glimpse of them on the amid the tears and flapdoodle of the tenth anniversary.

They were all boobs. Look up their pitchers. Look into their eyes. These were all losers, and I'm familiar with the type.

I'll warrant not one of those guys was on a flight that day, let alone in a cockpit.

randge  posted on  2011-11-24   10:18:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: lead.and.lag (#13)

you'd certainly never suspect a rabbi who signed the PNAC document that said he and his buddies needed a new pearl harbor

They are far from the first to have wished for a new Pearl Harbor to justify their warmongering. It's dime-a-dozen stuff, way more common than most people realize.

TooConservative  posted on  2011-11-24   15:35:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: randge (#14)

I'll warrant not one of those guys was on a flight that day, let alone in a cockpit.

Well, you'd need to provide proof of that.

If, in fact, they did not fly those planes, don't you think al-Qaeda (or whoever plotted 9/11) would have had enough brains to realize that they couldn't allow them to live? So the ongoing flapdoodles over one hijacker or another being spotted in public (out of a population of hundreds of millions of Arabs and Mideasterners of which any person has at least a dozen near matches in appearance) seems lame to me.

But then, if you want to believe something, these kinds of "facts" are so much more convincing, aren't they?

There's wishful thinking and pet theories. Then there is undeniable scientific evidence. Truthing is pretty weak on the latter.

TooConservative  posted on  2011-11-24   15:39:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: randge, 4 (#14)

I'll warrant not one of those guys was on a flight that day, let alone in a cockpit.

Of course they weren't.

Are we supposed to believe that the same .gov who couldn't prevent the event could identify the alleged perps within the day?

Preposterous baloney.

Break the Conventions - Keep the Commandments - G.K.Chesterson

Lod  posted on  2011-11-24   16:13:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: TooConservative (#12)

15 of 19 hijackers were Saudis

Some of which are still alive. So obviously, at least SOME of those "hijackers" are not hijackers at all, that or they are superhumans who can survive plane crashes and brush it off.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-11-24   16:36:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: TooConservative (#16)

Well, you'd need to provide proof of that.

No sir. It is you who have to provide evidence that they were where the cultivated mythology has put them.

Then there is undeniable scientific evidence.

Knock yourself out. We'll settle for some garden variety evidence. You'll have a deuce of a time digging that out, let alone technical evidence of any kind.

randge  posted on  2011-11-24   22:27:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: TooConservative (#16)

But then, if you want to believe something, these kinds of "facts" are so much more convincing, aren't they?

Like the "fact" of the goobermint finding one mint condition passport from one of the "hi-jackers" on a sidewalk in NYC......yet they can't find a black box for the plane. Oh yeah, that fire proof passport simply flew out of the flaming plane to land in all the ruble for a goobermint boob to classify as "evidence".........

" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11

"Life's tough, and even tougher if you're stupid." --John Wayne

abraxas  posted on  2011-11-24   22:34:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: GreyLmist, Shoonra (#7)

What's your opinion on why our nation's alert and readiness level wasn't elevated to Defcon 1?

Don't hold your breath waiting for an answer from the shoon.


We are not allowed to make a decision as mundane as what kind of lightbulb we're going to use anymore, but we're allowed to choose who runs the city, state, and fedgoob? Give me a break. - Esso

SolvoSermo.Com Free speech Video Hosting

Critter  posted on  2011-11-25   1:30:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: abraxas (#20)

Like the "fact" of the goobermint finding one mint condition passport from one of the "hi-jackers" on a sidewalk in NYC......yet they can't find a black box for the plane. Oh yeah, that fire proof passport simply flew out of the flaming plane to land in all the ruble for a goobermint boob to classify as "evidence".........

hehehehe

christine  posted on  2011-11-25   10:27:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: abraxas (#20)

Like the "fact" of the goobermint finding one mint condition passport from one of the "hi-jackers" on a sidewalk in NYC...

Freakish events happen constantly. It is only highly improbable, not impossible.

There is a big difference between evidence and improbable events.

Again, this kind of thing weighs very strongly if you are already predisposed toward Trutherism but it is not especially compelling if you aren't.

TooConservative  posted on  2011-11-26   8:50:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: TooConservative (#11)

What's your opinion on why our nation's alert and readiness level wasn't elevated to Defcon 1?

I've no idea. The problem with stories like this is that they have a complicated timeline

The timeline isn't complicated. The timeline is 9/11/01.

and we can have no confidence that we ever got the entire truth out of the 9/11 Commission.

From the article: [Gen.] Myers told the 9/11 Commission that the reason for going to Defcon 3 [My note: the highest alert level in 28 years] was "to improve our readiness and protection of our forces worldwide."

What else would you need to see from the 9/11 Commission to convince you that not going to Defcon 1 here that day so as to improve the readiness and protection of this country was like unreasonable?

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2011-11-28   16:07:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]