[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!

Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing

MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent

House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups

Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners

Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza

AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition

Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report

Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight

Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency

Stealing JFK's Body

Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence

ASHEVILLE UPDATE: Bodies Being Stacked in Warehouses & Children Being Taken Away

American news is mostly written by Israeli lobbyists pushing Zionist agenda

Biden's Missile Crisis

British Operation Kiss kill Instantly Skripals Has Failed to Kill But Succeeded at Covering Up, Almost

NASA chooses SpaceX and Blue Origin to deliver rover, astronaut base to the moon

The Female Fantasy Exposed: Why Women Love Toxic Love Stories

United States will NOT comply with the ICC arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu:

Mississippi’s GDP Beats France: A Shocking Look at Economic Policy Failures (Per Capita)


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: GOP Willing To Raise Payroll Taxes On 113 Million Households To Spare 345,000 Millionaires From Tiny Surtax
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/20 ... 77956/gop-payroll-tax-numbers/
Published: Dec 2, 2011
Author: tp
Post Date: 2011-12-02 10:23:03 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 186
Comments: 9

GOP Willing To Raise Payroll Taxes On 113 Million Households To Spare 345,000 Millionaires From Tiny Surtax

By Pat Garofalo on Nov 29, 2011 at 4:35 pm

Senate Democrats yesterday introduced legislation — as they’ve been promising to — that would extend a soon-to-expire payroll tax cut, and pay for it by implementing a surtax on income above $1 million. Republicans, of course, are opposing the plan, reviving their false claims that taxing the very wealthiest Americans will hit small businesses and job creators.

In essence, the GOP is saying that it’s willing to allow higher taxes on middle- and lower-income Americans in order to prevent tax increases on the very wealthy. According to an analysis by Citizens for Tax Justice, provided to the Washington Post’s Greg Sargent, the surtax would affect exceedingly few taxpayers, while a payroll tax cut expiration would wallop more than 100 million households:

The surtax would impact around 345,000 taxpayers, roughly 0.2 percent of taxpayers, or one in 500 of them. Those people would pay on average an additional 2.1 percent of their overall income, or just over 1/50th of that overall income, in taxes.

In a majority of states, only one-tenth of one percent, or one in 1,000 taxpayers, would pay this surtax.

And how many people would benefit from the payroll tax cut? According to the group, around 113 million tax filing units — either single workers or families that include more than one worker — would see their payroll tax cut extended. That’s a lot of people — well over 113 million workers, in fact.

Allowing the payroll tax cut to expire at the end of the year would hit middle-class families with a $1,000 tax increase, providing a substantial drag on the economy. In fact, according to Macroeconomic Advisers, allowing the payroll tax cut to lapse “would reduce GDP growth by 0.5 percent and cost the economy 400,000 jobs.” Other estimates are even worse, with Barclays’s estimating that a payroll tax increase could say 1.5 percent off of GDP growth.

The GOP has, time and again, blocked any legislation that would increase taxes by the slightest amount on the ultra-wealthy, even with tax revenue at a 60 year low, taxes on the rich the lowest they’ve been in a generation, and income inequality out of control. Instead, Republicans would prefer to raise taxes on the middle-class, knocking the economy where it can least afford it. Tags:

Taxes

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

#1. To: tom007 (#0)

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

As long as the Democraps support a progressive/graduated income tax, they can blow me for eternity. Their stubborn insistence on soaking the rich reveals them for the communists that they vehemently deny that they are.

Should the Republicans hold out on taxing the rich at a higher rate to make their ideological point against communism??

X-15  posted on  2011-12-02   10:35:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: X-15 (#1)

Why should the poor or middle class pay for the wars (and corporate welfare) that the rich demand, while allowing the rich to pay little if any taxes at all?

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-12-02   10:56:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: FormerLurker (#2)

"Why should the poor or middle class pay for the wars (and corporate welfare) that the rich demand,

Are you talking about 20 rich people, or what?

The top 1% is paying almost 40% of all income taxes collected, and the top 5% is paying 60%.

It's the bottom 50% of the wage earners that aren't paying any taxes.

Big Meanie  posted on  2011-12-02   12:22:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Big Meanie, FormerLurker (#4)

"Why should the poor or middle class pay for the wars (and corporate welfare) that the rich demand,

Are you talking about 20 rich people, or what?

The top 1% is paying almost 40% of all income taxes collected, and the top 5% is paying 60%.

"....while allowing the rich to pay little if any taxes at all?"

It's the bottom 50% of the wage earners that aren't paying any taxes.

The other problem, in addition to the ones that FL points out, is that the income tax number is misleading as far as comparative tax loads go. Total combined personal and business (which are actually paid by the consumer as they are factored into the price of goods and services) is only about 1/3 (37% last I checked) of total Federal Tax Revenues. The rest of it is collected via fees, excises, and tariffs which all fall disproportionately upon those least able to pay them. For example the price of tobacco products is about 90% tax combining both state and federal. While not as extreme you will find similar taxes on utilities of all kinds, tires, bread, milk, etc., etc., etc., ....

Prices of goods and service all reflect the taxes paid by both the producer and the seller. That is one of the perverse incentives created which has spurred offshore manufacturing.

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-12-02   13:57:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 8.

        There are no replies to Comment # 8.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]