[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Miscellaneous See other Miscellaneous Articles Title: Chief Reckoner's choice for US president The Daily Reckoning has no voice in the US presidential elections. But we will nevertheless declare a preference. Were he to toss his hat in the ring, we would line up behind former Senator Jon Corzine. The ex-Goldman chief has the experience that America needs. He has been a front-runner in politics...and in the world of finance, what he doesnt know about front running is probably not worth knowing. Presuming, however, that Corzine will be too busy fending off lawsuits or jail sentences, our next choice is Republican Newt Gingrich. Of course, we find him completely repulsive, who wouldnt? But we believe hes the man of the hour. History needs him, to carry on the work of Bush and Obama, hustling the great nation on its way to Hell. It is rare for a decent man to seek public office. He is ashamed of pandering. He is embarrassed by the stupidity of his own slogans. He is appalled by the low-lifes and quasi criminals with whom he must associate and from whom he must beg support. They are all swarming around Newt Gingrich now. The handlers, pollsters, word polishers, idea chiselers, fund raisers, donors, hangers on, groupies, roadies carpet-bagging rascals every one of them. Now theyve got the scent in their nostrils. Their chests heave. The hearts pump. If they can just keep their man Newt from blowing himself up theyll be in high cotton for at least 4 years. One will head a commission or a cushy seat at the UN. Another will get a contract to provide the pentagon with new ID badges. Another will ride into a remote Congressional seat on Newts coattails. Power. Money. If Newt wins, they win. Newts women will think themselves smarter and prettier. The men among them will feel their most private part growing bigger. American presidential candidates generally fall into three categories. Those who are obviously incompetent. Those who are scalawags. And those who are jackasses. The job of the voters is to choose the defect most suited to the time. Winston Churchill was a disaster as First Lord of the Admiralty during WWI; the Gallipoli campaign was his doing. Then, on how to deal with the Iraqi insurgents, circa 1920, he offered this advice: Use chemical weapons against recalcitrant Arabs as an experiment, he suggested, adding, I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes to spread a lively terror. Later, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, he put Britain back on the gold standard, but at a level that was bound to cause trouble. It came, in 1929. He may have been incompetent. He may have been a big-mouth imperialist. But Churchill was the man Britain needed in 1940. When times are good, the public generally prefers a scalawag. Clinton was the perfect president for the 90s boom years. Warren Harding would have been a great fit with the boom of the 20s. He drank. He played cards. He snuck out of the White House to go to girlie shows. Otherwise, he left people alone. But he was a little early. Most of the Roaring Twenties boom happened during the Coolidge administration. On the surface, Coolidge was a mismatch. Straitlaced. A bit of a scold. But he minded his own business and like Clinton during the dotcom bubble or Bush during the property bubble he let speculators ruin themselves without raising an objection. The trouble with Herbert Hoover was that he was too much of a nuts and bolts engineer. The public turned him out. They preferred Roosevelts confident malarkey. They wanted a man with a plan. No matter that the plan was claptrap. Theyd never figure that out. Thats the problem with Obama. He has no plan. He doesnt know what is going on, or what to do about it. Which at least marks him as more intelligent than most of his challengers, who have the wrong idea on both counts. But neither brains nor competence is what the public wants now. In an emergency it wants Churchill, not Chamberlain. A Roosevelt, not a Hoover. It wants a bold liar. A hearty delusional. Gingrich is their man. A letter in The Financial Times compared him to Churchill. He compares himself to de Gaulle. Both are correct, in our view. He is as humble as de Gaulle and at least as competent as Churchill. He is a cad who reportedly told his second wife that she was too old and too ugly to be a presidents wife. He is a scoundrel who took $1.8 million from zombie mortgage lender, Freddie Mac. He makes angels weep; the gods get their backs up. So cometh Newt Gingrich to the Republican race. If youre dumb enough, you think hes smart. If youre corrupt enough, you think he is honest. If you compare him to the field of candidates, he doesnt seem any more asinine than the rest. He is incompetent, scalawag and jackass all in one package. A man for all seasons. Most importantly, he is committed to keeping America on course to its own destruction. The US already runs the biggest deficits in the developed world. Gingrich would add to them by about $850 billion, according to one estimate. He hopes Reagan- era growth will eventually balance the books. He also thinks an Electro-Magnetic Pulse is one of the biggest dangers America faces. And he believes in American exceptionalism as if the nation can dodge fate with some special math that applies to it alone. But if you begin asking questions about Newts pensee you are missing the point. Americas empire is decadent and degenerate. It needs a man like Newt to help it on its way... to where all exceptional empires end up on the scrap heap of history. Bill Bonner for The Daily Reckoning Poster Comment: That sounds like the criteria that the Israeli lobby would use in its choice for US president. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
What is worse, is that too many Americans will buy the Israeli lobby's choice.
If the objective is to take US down, the slimy salamander is the one to get it done.
Break the Conventions - Keep the Commandments - G.K.Chesterson |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|