[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Consequences of Mild, Moderate & Severe Plagiarism

Plagiarism: 5 Potential Legal Consequences

When Philadelphia’s Foul-Mouthed Cop-Turned-Mayor Invented White Identity Politics

Trump Wanted to Pardon Assange and Snowden. Blocked by RINOs.

What The Pentagon Is Planning Against Trump Will Make Your Blood Run Cold Once Revealed

How Trump won the Amish vote in Pennsylvania

FEC Filings Show Kamala Harris Team Blew Funds On Hollywood Stars, Private Jets

Israel’s Third Lebanon War is underway: What you need to know

LEAK: First Behind-The-Scenes Photos Of Kamala After Getting DESTROYED By Trump | Guzzling Wine!🍷

Scott Ritter Says: Netanyahu's PAINFUL Stumble Pushes Tel Aviv Into Its WORST NIGHTMARE

These Are Trump's X-Men | Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

Houthis (Yemen) Breached THAAD. Israel Given a Dud Defense!!

Yuma County Arizona Doubles Its Outstanding Votes Overnight They're Stealing the Race from Kari Lake

Trump to withdraw U.S. troops from northern Syria

Trump and RFK created websites for the people to voice their opinion on people the government is hiring

Woke Georgia DA Deborah Gonzalez pummeled in re-election bid after refusing Laken Riley murder case

Trump has a choice: Obliterate Palestine or end the war

Rod Blagojevich: Kamala’s Corruption, & the Real Cause of the Democrat Party’s Spiral Into Insanity

Israel's Defense Shattered by Hezbollah's New Iranian Super Missiles | Prof. Mohammad Marandi

Trump Wins Arizona in Clean Sweep of Swing States in US Election

TikTok Harlots Pledge in Droves: No More Pussy For MAGA Fascists!

Colonel Douglas Macgregor:: Honoring Veteran's Day

Low-Wage Nations?

Trump to pull US out of Paris climate agreement NYT

Pixar And Disney Animator Bolhem Bouchiba Sentenced To 25 Years In Prison

Six C-17s, C-130s deploy US military assets to Northeastern Syria

SNL cast members unveil new "hot jacked" Trump character in MAGA-friendly cold open

Here's Why These Geopolitical And Financial Chokepoints Need Your Attention...

Former Army Chief Moshe Ya'alon Calls for Civil Disobedience to Protest Netanyahu Government

The Deep State against Trump


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Military Shares Public's Declining Support For Bush, War
Source: Associated Press
URL Source: http://www.newsobserver.com/news/nc ... s/story/2826967p-9276680c.html
Published: Oct 29, 2005
Author: Associated Press
Post Date: 2005-10-29 19:57:40 by Brian S
Keywords: Declining, Military, Publics
Views: 326
Comments: 73

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- More than half of North Carolina military members surveyed in the latest Elon University poll disapprove of President Bush's handling of the war in Iraq and his overall job performance.

Nearly 53 percent of military members said they strongly disapproved or disapproved of Bush's handling of his job. And just more than 56 percent of that same group strongly disapproved or disapproved of how he has dealt with the Iraq war.

Overall, 53 percent of those surveyed for the poll released Friday did not approve of Bush's job performance, while 57 percent did not approve of his handling of the Iraq war.

"We see that those most involved in the Iraq situation, the military, are not so different from the general public after all and share the same concerns about Iraq," said Hunter Bacot, the poll's director. "Conventional wisdom might suggest that the military would be more supportive of Bush in Iraq, but that simply isn't the case if you look at the numbers."

North Carolina has one of the nation's largest military presences, with major Army, Marine and Air Force installations based in eastern North Carolina. North Carolina-based active-duty and reserve units have seen extensive action since the United States attacked Afghanistan following the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

Of the 539 adults surveyed for the Elon poll, 80 - or 14.8 percent of the sample - were active-duty, reserve, retired or veteran members of the military. The telephone poll was conducted between Monday and Thursday and has a margin of error for the entire sample of plus or minus 4.3 percentage points.

The margin of error, which reflects the confidence that the results speak for an entire group, is higher for smaller groups, such as the 80 military members.

Just over half of those people surveyed said the United States should no longer be in Iraq, while nearly 43 percent agreed that the country should remain there. The rest said they did not know or refused to answer.

Roughly half of those polled - 52 percent - said they do not know if the war in Iraq was worth fighting. The poll showed about 15 percent believe the war was worthwhile and 29.1 percent do not think so.

Military members were somewhat more supportive of the United States' presence in Iraq than the general population, with exactly half saying the nation should be there and 41.3 percent saying it should not.

More than half of military members - 51 percent - said they did not know if the war was worth fighting, while 19 percent said the war was worth it and 29 percent said it was not

The low approval numbers for Bush seen in the poll continue a pattern of declining support for the second-term president seen in previous Elon polls and nationally.

The percentage of those surveyed who say they strongly approve or approve of Bush's job performance was down to 41 percent in the current poll from a recent peak of 55 percent in February 2004.

Approval of Bush's handling of the Iraq war has dropped from 52 percent in September 2003 to nearly 39 percent now.

Approval of the president's handling of the economy ticked up slightly in the current poll, to 37 percent, from the 36 percent approval registered in April. The peak was 42 percent in September 2004.

Elon's Institute for Politics and Public Affairs has been conducting its poll since 2000.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 54.

#3. To: Brian S (#0)

I saw this over on another site. I find it amazing.

It's like the Iraqi poll where 64% of them wanted the US out immediately.

Is there any relevant group within the US where more than 50% of the people support the war? Maybe rapture monkeys, but I seriously can't think of any other group. Can anyone else?

avian virus  posted on  2005-10-29   20:09:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: avian virus (#3)

I can't. Isn't it curious then that not only is there no exit plan for Iraq, but that it's also onward to Iran and Syria! Where are they going to get the "dumb, stupid animals" for it?

christine  posted on  2005-10-29   20:17:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: christine (#7)

Isn't it curious then that not only is there no exit plan for Iraq ...

Like the one we had for Germany and other European countries after WWII?

Okay ...

_Jim  posted on  2005-10-29   20:23:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: _Jim (#9)

Like the one we had for Germany and other European countries after WWII?

Congress declared war on Germany, the War on Iraq is intervention at best. This may surprise you, you stupid little jackboot, but George Washington didn't have an "exit strategy" either.

ps: you are an ignorant, vile asshole, I hope you die of AIDS.

Dakmar  posted on  2005-10-29   20:53:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Dakmar (#21)

Congress declared war on Germany, the War on Iraq is intervention at best.

Congress also passed resolution(s) regarding Iraq, and Germany had not directly attacked us either, yet we 'declared war'.

I guess I'm going to put you on Bozo for awhile too, kind of a 'time out', FRiend.

_Jim  posted on  2005-10-29   20:55:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Dakmar, Flintlock, rowdee, christine, all (#22)

I guess I'm going to put you on Bozo for awhile too, kind of a 'time out', FRiend.

Jeeze, Dak ol' buddy, I guess we're gonna have to start a 'Free Dakmar' fund to get you out of trouble along with Flintlock and rowdee.

Can't leave y'all in l'il jimmie's l'il gitmo all weekend. LOL!

Esso  posted on  2005-10-29   21:21:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Esso (#31)

FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK! FREEDAK!

rowdee  posted on  2005-10-29   21:39:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: rowdee (#35)

hahahahahahahaha!

christine  posted on  2005-10-29   21:44:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: christine (#38)

Here is the opening section of the "Key Findings" executive summary section, and excdefrpoted below are the first two bulleted items:

Key Findings

Saddam Husayn so dominated the Iraqi Regime that its strategic intent was his alone. He wanted to end sanctions while preserving the capability to reconstitute his weapons of mass destruction (WMD) when sanctions were lifted.

- Saddam totally dominated the Regime's strategic decision making. He initiated most of the strategic thinking upon which decisions were made, whether in matters of war and peace (such as invading Kuwait), maintaining WMD as a national strategic goal, or on how Iraq was to position itself in the international community. Loyal dissent was discouraged and constructive variations to the implementation of his wishes on strategic issues were rare. Saddam was the Regime in a strategic sense and his intent became Iraq's strategic policy.

- Saddam's primary goal from 1991 to 2003 was to have UN sanctions lifted, while maintaining the security of the Regime. He sought to balance the need to cooperate with UN inspections--to gain support for lifting sanctions?with his intention to preserve Iraq's intellectual capital for WMD with a minimum of foreign intrusiveness and loss of face. Indeed, this remained the goal to the end of the Regime, as the starting of any WMD program, conspicuous or otherwise, risked undoing the progress achieved in eroding sanctions and jeopardizing a political end to the embargo and international monitoring.

So, we can take it from that that the threat was indeed a gathering threat, with Saddam just biding his time until sanctions could be lifted and he would be back in business with full-scale WMD programs ...

_Jim  posted on  2005-10-29   22:00:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: _Jim (#43)

Jim. I know you've got two accounts going and you can see this.

I also know you're playing the bozo game to gain time to spin up answers to the questions you can't answer now. You want to come back later and bomb people with new spin when the people are no longer on line. This is a slimey tactic. I think we need to gin up a way to deal with it.

avian virus  posted on  2005-10-29   22:12:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 54.

        There are no replies to Comment # 54.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 54.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]