[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses

Asia Not Nearly Gay Enough Yet, CNN Laments

Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses on Harris (VIDEO)

Biden-Harris Admin Sued For Records On Trans Surgeries On Minors

Rasmussen Poll Numbers: Kamala's 'Bounce' Didn't Faze Trump

Trump BREAKS Internet With Hysterical Ad TORCHING Kamala | 'She is For They/Them!'

45 Funny Cybertruck Memes So Good, Even Elon Might Crack A Smile

Possible Trump Rally Attack - Serious Injuries Reported

BULLETIN: ISRAEL IS ENTERING **** UKRAINE **** WAR ! Missile Defenses in Kiev !

ATF TO USE 2ND TRUMP ATTACK TO JUSTIFY NEW GUN CONTROL...

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll

The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it.

The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means

New York's MTA Proposes $65.4 Billion In Upgrades With Cash It Doesn't Have

More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico

New York state reports 1st human case of EEE in nearly a decade

Oktoberfest tightens security after a deadly knife attack in western Germany

Wild Walrus Just Wanted to Take A Summer Vacation Across Europe

[Video] 'Days of democracy are GONE' seethes Neil Oliver as 'JAIL' awaits Brits DARING to speak up

Police robot dodges a bullet, teargasses a man, and pins him to the ground during a standoff in Texas

Julian Assange EXPOSED

Howling mad! Fury as school allows pupil suffering from 'species dysphoria' to identify as a WOLF

"I Thank God": Heroic Woman Saves Arkansas Trooper From Attack By Drunk Illegal Alien

Taxpayers Left In The Dust On Policy For Trans Inmates In Minnesota


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: U.S./Israeli Hypocrisy Knows No Bounds
Source: MEDIA MONITORS NETWORK
URL Source: http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/21952
Published: Oct 29, 2005
Author: Stan Moore
Post Date: 2005-10-29 20:13:34 by Brian S
Keywords: U.S./Israeli, Hypocrisy, Bounds
Views: 123
Comments: 18

(Thursday October 27 2005)


"The Romans used to behave the same way when they held sway."


So, the U.S. has learned that Syria interfered in the interior affairs of its neighbor, Lebanon. For shame! So, what is the reaction to shocking state of affairs? The U.S. and Israel plot to remove the leader of Syria and install a new government friendly to their own interests. Syrian meddling is verboten, U.S./Israeli meddling is taken for granted.

The Syrians are also accused of sending arms and "foreign fighters" into Iraq. How wrong and inappropriate and unacceptable! After all, only America and Britain and Israel and their allies have the right to send their own foreign fighters and arms to Iraq. How dare those Syrians put a fly in the British/American pudding once again!

Saddam Hussein was vilified by President Bush and his administration for torturing Iraqis at Abu Graib prison. But, not only does the Bush Administration condone and even require torture while stating that it does not torture its prisoners around the world, but the Bush Administration, while claiming it does not torture prisoners insists on retaining the legal authority under U.S. law to use torture in the "War on Terror", which is a U.S. contrivance. How convoluted can you get? As Mama Gump used to say, "Torture is as torture does", and the U.S. under Bush has done a lot of torture. Torture was bad if Saddam Hussein did it, but a necessary evil if Bush and Geoffrey Miller do it.

The hypocrisy of the American government and its coalition of the killing is limitless. The only reason the situation exists is the raw military and economic power of the U.S.

The Romans used to behave the same way when they held sway. But the times are starting to change, and the ragtag bands of Iraqi insurgents are demonstrating very well the limits of American power. America has plenty of bullets and uses them with proliferation waste on Iraqi flesh, but while bullets and bombs destroy human flesh, they cannot destroy the human spirit. The spiritual deficit of the American Empire will eventually bring it down and the hypocrisy and destructiveness displayed by empirical ambitions and actions will stand like a universal monument to evil and greed.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

America has plenty of bullets and uses them with proliferation waste on Iraqi flesh, but while bullets and bombs destroy human flesh, they cannot destroy the human spirit.

George Bush: "Keep on riding me. They'll be picking iron out of your liver."

The cheaper the crook, the gaudier the patter.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2005-10-29   20:24:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Brian S (#0)

The hypocrisy of the American government and its coalition of the killing is limitless. The only reason the situation exists is the raw military and economic power of the U.S.

That, and we just might know a thing or two about Liberty and Freedom, right and wrong, about saving the world from dictators, INSERT OTHER SELFLESS ACTS HERE; THAT is our authority.

_Jim  posted on  2005-10-29   20:29:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: All (#2)

I see no one disagrees with my preceeding post; maybe, just maybe the image of the US being a positive force in the world, a force for peace in the world, exists in the minds of others as well as myself.

_Jim  posted on  2005-10-29   21:52:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: _Jim (#3)

You want someone to disagree with your list of silly platitudes so you can call them an Amerian hater?

No one is going to bite. It's an old trick the Repubilcan shills use when they run out of arguments. We've seen it many times before.

avian virus  posted on  2005-10-29   21:54:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: _Jim (#3)

Let me add that you are a dishonest coward who hides behind the bozo filter. Do you do this because you can't defend what you say? Bush is sort of the same way, that is probably why he doesn't give open press conferences.

avian virus  posted on  2005-10-29   21:56:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: _Jim (#3)

in the minds of others as well as myself.

Nope. Most people have a brain in their head. _Jim you head is just packed fulla shit.

Soda Pop  posted on  2005-10-29   21:57:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: _Jim (#3)

Jim. People don't respect you. They see through you and they are laughing at you.

That's why they insult you the way the do.

Putting them on bozo just makes you look like a coward. A coward and a blowhard.

This makes people respect you even less.

As I said before, you are a really rotten advocate for the agenda you want to advance.

The first thing to do when trying to convert people is to get them to like you, not convince them that you are a slimey little loud mouthed coward.

avian virus  posted on  2005-10-29   22:01:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: _Jim (#2)

Dictatorship is unlimited law-making power. Totalitarianism is dictatorship that abuses it's power. When Bush speaks of freedom, he is actually referring to the legal privileges granted by the fedgov to the super-majority of voters that are officially designated as underprivileged or oppressed. The American two-party system has designated the underprivileged and oppressed to be jews/homosexuals/women/blacks/hispanics/jews. When Bush speaks of democracy, he is actually referring to bolshevism, a dictatorship of the majority. Whether it's a dictatorship dominated by one party (Baathist) or two parties (demo/repub), it's still evil.

Googolplex  posted on  2005-10-29   22:15:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Googolplex (#8)

Whew!

FRiend, you said a mouthful! I need to separate parts out so I can better understand:

Dictatorship is unlimited law-making power.

Totalitarianism is dictatorship that abuses it's power.

I don't know of many 'dictatorships' that didn't drift into Totalitarianism (absolute power corrupting absolutely); so we may for the purposes of this discussion treat these as the same.

When Bush speaks of freedom, he is actually referring to the legal privileges granted by the fedgov to the super-majority of voters that are officially designated as underprivileged or oppressed.

MAjor jump in thought here.

I may/I do need a little enlightenment here, perhaps a white paper or dissertation on this for further in-depth study.

The American two-party system has designated the underprivileged and oppressed to be jews/homosexuals/women/blacks/hispanics/jews.

A) When did this occur?

Can you provide a date for the turning point in history where this took place, who was involved, what sort of records of this event still exist?

B) Is there any part of the state party platform convention where they perform this designatkion, amd/or what commitee is charged with this task?

C) Can these people still vote?

In city, county, state or federal elections?

When Bush speaks of democracy, he is actually referring to bolshevism, a dictatorship of the majority.

Hmmmm. It strikes me, as common sense, that strict democracy is a 'dictatorship of the majority'. It is through the representative form of government we hope to avoid this.

Whether it's a dictatorship dominated by one party (Baathist) or two parties (demo/repub), it's still evil.

Thank God we have a Republic, not a strict democracy, right?

_Jim  posted on  2005-10-29   22:54:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: _Jim (#9)

The American two-party system has designated the underprivileged and oppressed to be jews/homosexuals/women/blacks/hispanics/jews.

A) When did this occur?

The list of who is underprivileged/disadvantaged/oppressed has evolved, and is continuing to evolve, over time. The first instance of special rights becoming federal law was during the presidency of JFK.

B) Is there any part of the state party platform convention where they perform this designatkion, amd/or what commitee is charged with this task?

The two-party system does not control the list of so-called oppressed voters. The list is concocted by the professional vote brokers, bolshevik and zionist jews, militant homosexuals, people that own mass media outlets, and so- called civil rights (politically correct) lawyers and judges that shephard "special rights" legislation through the court system.

C) Can these people still vote? In city, county, state or federal elections?

Of course, the voting rights of the so-called oppressed majority is hyper- protected by federal law and knee-jerk federal police intervention. The two- party system has a vested interest in the so-called oppressed majority's proven willingness to sell votes in exchange for legal privileges. The federal abortion issue is a rather obvious contemporary example of a massive vote- buying scheme concocted by the two-party system and the professional vote brokers (bolshevik/zionist jews and homosexuals). The two-party system hands out privileges tot he oppressed majority in exchange for federal power, especially control of tax and spend policy and military policy.

When Bush speaks of democracy, he is actually referring to bolshevism, a dictatorship of the majority.

Hmmmm. It strikes me, as common sense, that strict democracy is a 'dictatorship of the majority'. It is through the representative form of government we hope to avoid this.

Wrongo!!! The legal prevention of dictatorship is the strict constitutional delegation of power, from the smaller gov entity to the larger gov entity, as enumerated in the text of the US constitution. Check out the tenth amendment for further clarification. The ultimate prevention of dictatorship is state secession.

Thank God we have a Republic, not a strict democracy, right?

The two-party system has not only declared the fedgov to be a representative democracy, a treasonous act by itself, they have also authorized the illegal invasion of foreign countries with the express purpose of imposing democracy. The American two-party system is a treasonous bolshevik/zionist conspiracy. Political correctness is now a defacto state religion, invented by bolshevik and zionist jews, that is imposed by the two-party system as a pseudo- rationalization for the legal privileges granted to the designated oppressed majority as part of a massive vote-buying scheme.

Googolplex  posted on  2005-10-30   18:54:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: _Jim (#9)

By the way, the word "democracy" is never mentioned even once in the text of the US constitution. There are good reasons for it's exclusion, but no two- party politician or two-bit mass-media pundit would seem to recognize it. You will often hear or read of various variations on the pervasive democracy-as- ideal-governance meme such as representative democracy, liberal democracy, or direct democracy...it's all bull from the same bolshevik/zionist sympathizing shitheads. Democracy is dictatorship, dictatorship is evil, the bolshevik/zionist PC religion is evil, and dictatorship and PC religion nonsense is prohibited by a strict interpretation of the US constitution.

Googolplex  posted on  2005-10-30   20:04:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Googolplex (#11)

Your recipient it gone and good riddance.....

"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth." - Albert Einstein

timetobuildaboat  posted on  2005-10-30   20:07:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: timetobuildaboat (#12)

Has _Jim been banned from posting at freedom4um?

Googolplex  posted on  2005-10-30   20:29:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Googolplex (#13)

Yes

"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth." - Albert Einstein

timetobuildaboat  posted on  2005-10-30   20:29:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Googolplex (#13)

Sad huh?

"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth." - Albert Einstein

timetobuildaboat  posted on  2005-10-30   20:30:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: timetobuildaboat (#15)

He was an ardent spokeperson for the American two-party system. It's not like there is a shortage of them in the world.

Googolplex  posted on  2005-10-30   20:33:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Googolplex (#16)

The old "two party" paradigm is flush with willing naves.

"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth." - Albert Einstein

timetobuildaboat  posted on  2005-10-30   20:36:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: timetobuildaboat (#14)

How do we know when someone has been banned from posting. I know as a forinstance JimRob's and Brett's software puts a:

This account has been banned or suspended

announcement in the place of the home page of banned posters but I see no such announcement in _Jim's home page here.

Elapidae, Micrurus fulvius

Coral Snake  posted on  2005-10-30   21:02:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]