[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11 See other 9/11 Articles Title: Flight 77 Passengers We are told that there were 64 passengers were on board Flight 77. We count 59, including 6 crew members. We presume they mean 59 passengers and crew, plus 5 Hijackers Patsies. There is no Arab name on the list of victims as reported by the media (see Passenger Links below). The capacity of Flight 77 was 239 passengers, and with 53 passengers aboard, that is an occupancy rate of 23%. We have flown a great deal in Europe and North America, and never at any time in the last decade have we flown a trans-continental flight that was 3/4 empty (this is of course pre-9/11). The numbers appear out-of-whack, thankfully. And so, a lingering question is why the passenger loads on the four planes hijacked in US skies are being described by industry officials as "very, very low." Many investigators suspect the terrorists at the very least shopped for flights with low passenger loads, making it easier for them -- presumably armed only with knives and box cutters -- to prevent passenger uprisings. ... "They wanted the numbers to be on their side." And they were: staggeringly so. CNN Three of the transcontinental flights departed for the West Coast with at least two thirds of the seats empty. Only 37 of the 182 seats were occupied -- including four by hijackers, at least two in first class -- as United Airlines' Flight 93 left Newark for San Francisco. Through July, airlines in the United States reported flights on average were 71 percent capacity this year. There is no evidence that the hijackers actually "shopped for flights" at all. In some cases we are told that they simply purchased their tickets over the Internet. But this is truly a bizarre passenger list. Well, if you look at the occupations of the passengers of Flight 77, you get a strange feeling that something is wrong with this picture: For a random collection of passengers, this is a very impressive manifest. We use the results of Killtown's work on the passenger list, which was drawn from the canonical sources of 9/11 victims biographical information on the Internet: the numbers in square brackets are the numbers in Killtown's listing . a senior scientist with the US Navy, retired Army. [12] A third-generation physicist whose work at the Navy was so classified that his family knew very little about what he did each day. They don't even know exactly why he was headed to Los Angeles on the doomed American Airlines Flight 77. The odds against this being a random group of 53 American Airlines passengers are simply astronomical! There are more top secret security clearances here than in most medium-sized cities in America. Especially astounding in this bizarre passenger list is the preponderance of Navy personnel amongst the 4 armed services, and the tilt toward propulsion and guidance systems amongst all of the possible secret technologies. It's almost as if someone put this list together thinking that Navy personnel were expendable - or needed to be expended. This looks like a charter flight for the military-industrial complex; it's almost as if this plane should have taken off from the Pentagon, rather than supposedly crashing into it. Poster Comment: Some very good links at the bottom of this piece too. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
#3. To: Eric Stratton (#0)
(Edited)
Hmmmm? Now if you wanted to staff a deep deep black facility - so deep in fact that no one who worked at it would ever be allowed to leave once they were in - how would you go about doing that when most of the potential staff had families who would continue to ask questions if they disappeared with no explanation? How would you go about doing that? The people in question have to disappear without a trace and without questions. Well one obvious way is that they "die". Nobody ever asks where someone is after they're dead. After all we know where they are - they're dead - and convincingly so. While such a posited facility could be a deeply buried research site, such as has been ferreted out by Dr. Richard Sauder, there are also tantalizing clues that suggest that there are off planet facilities as well. There are a small number of clues both direct and indirect that suggest that somewhere in the bowels of the black community we have long had a functioning non-rocket space drive that has likely been operational since at least the early 60's if not sometime in the 50's. So, if you needed a lot of scientific and engineering staff, top flight people, to staff an off planet facility involved in R&D where do you get them without raising alarms and blowing your cover? Why, you recruit dead people. After all - they're dead.
I'm glad I did not make my post without going back and reading yours. But, Barbara Olsen? I wonder if anyone has searched out the wives and children of these men? How many of them have been killed or diappeared since 09/2000.
#10. To: octavia (#8)
Good question. I can only speculate, but she was an intelligent and attractive woman in a failing marriage. Despite the entry of some women into the fields the physical sciences and engineering are still largely male provinces. So, a research lab, even in the black world, would be mostly men. So, there would be a need for women to fill "other positions" - administrative etc., ... to provide a balance. Men, normal men, really do like having women around. Another good question - no data though. I haven't researched the subject.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|