[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed


Health
See other Health Articles

Title: Seafood 10,000 Times Over Safe Limit for Carcinogenic Contamination, FDA Says to Eat it Anyway
Source: Activist Post
URL Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12 ... times-over-safe-limit-for.html
Published: Dec 23, 2011
Author: Mike Barrett
Post Date: 2011-12-23 21:55:32 by Original_Intent
Keywords: FDA, fraud, death, administration
Views: 411
Comments: 24

Seafood 10,000 Times Over Safe Limit for Carcinogenic Contamination, FDA Says to Eat it Anyway

Mike Barrett
Activist Post

Despite seafood showing extremely high levels of contamination, the FDA still deems the food safe for consumption.


The FDA not only falsely softened the risk of seafood consumption due to carcinogenic contaminants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the seafood supply, but also ignored individual FDA staff members who called for higher levels of contamination protection.

The oil spill into the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 was one of the largest offshore oil spills in history. One recent study conducted by researchers at the Natural Resources Defense Council found that FDA Gulf seafood “safe levels” actually allowed 100 to 10,000 times more carcinogenic PAHs in seafood than what is safe. This move by the FDA is not only only irresponsible for environmental and human safety, but puts those who are more vulnerable at a higher risk, such as pregnant women and children. 

FDA Says Yo Don’t Need to Remove Your Overly-Contaminated Seafood


Researchers who conducted the study, which was published in the top peer-reviewed environmental health journal Environmental Health Perspectives, found the information from snatched internal emails and unreleased assessments from the FDA under the Freedom of Information Act. The FDA argues that the reason they downplayed the risk is biased on the side of safety.

The director of the FDA has been reported stating “overly conservative estimates would lead you [to] remove a great deal of food from our refrigerators and pantries than is needed”

Seeing as consuming highly contaminated seafood is completely opposite of safe, this kind of response of course suggests that the FDA’s decision had little to do with safety, and was likely driven by political factors.


This wouldn’t be the first time that the FDA falsified or presented manipulated data. The agency also ignored the fact that mercury, an element that is highly toxic in all forms, was found in a large number of brand-name processed foods. But  instead of addressing this major public health concern, the FDA decided to focus their time on crushing beneficial supplements through ridiculous NDI regulations that threaten the entire infrastructure of the nutraceuticals industry.

In addition, the Food and Drug Administration has known for years that asthma drugs actually kill more patients than asthma itself, but they simply ignored this information. Similarly, data indicates that through the combination of rays from the sun and ingredients found in sunscreen, the skin can be damaged so much that lesions and tumors can be the end result. But of course the US Food and Drug Administration has allegedly been aware of this critical information for the past ten years, but has done absolutely nothing to warn people about it.


Explore More:

  1. Flu Shots Contain More than 250 Times the EPA’s Safety Limit for Mercury
  2. ‘DNA Barcoding’ to Regulate Seafood Industry Through Genetic Scanning
  3. Fraudulent Seafood | Are You Really Getting What You Think You Are?
  4. FDA Claims Power to Seize Food Without Evidence of Contamination
  5. Choose Between Carcinogenic Light Bulbs or Excessive Prices
  6. This Type of Factory Produces 100 Times More Waste than the Entire US Population Combined
Please visit Natural Society for more great health news and vaccine information.


Poster Comment:

The government is here to help you. Yeah, right.(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.

#1. To: Original_Intent (#0) (Edited)

. One recent study conducted by researchers at the Natural Resources Defense Council found that FDA Gulf seafood “safe levels” actually allowed 100 to 10,000 times more carcinogenic PAHs in seafood than what is safe.

do you believe these people at the Natural Resources Defense Council?

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-12-23   22:08:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: lead.and.lag (#1)

do you believe these people at the Natural Resources Defense Council?

Damn, you beat me to it!

Researchers who conducted the study, which was published in the top peer-reviewed environmental health journal Environmental Health Perspectives, found the information from snatched internal emails and unreleased assessments from the FDA under the Freedom of Information Act.

Ah yes, the FOIA. Where are these docs??? Could they have been invented by the Natural Resources Defense Council or the Environmental Health Perspectives??

Dumbasses like OI would have us all believe that we are already dead from this, Fukushima, all sorts of things. He is simply not a happy camper unless he is making the effort to get people to panic over bullshit like this. He has come up with some real doozies.

Where are the docs?

PSUSA2  posted on  2011-12-24   9:06:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: PSUSA2 (#3)

my point was this:

if original intent believes the Natural Resources Defense Council about dangerous shellfish, does he believe them about global warming?

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-12-24   12:11:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: lead.and.lag (#4)

if original intent believes the Natural Resources Defense Council about dangerous shellfish, does he believe them about global warming?

It is data. Another point to compare to other data points. I take anything any Foundation supported group utters with a grain of salt, or a dash of petroleum, and compare it to other data.

And bringing up Glowbull Warming is a Red Herring as it has nothing to do with this particular report which is buttressed by other reports from other sources.

However, please feel free to eat as much contaminated seafood as you wish. Maybe with a dash of Fukushima Sauce. After all Supreme Reichskank Coulter says its good for you to get a few radionuclides in your tea.

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-12-24   15:09:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Original_Intent (#9) (Edited)

However, please feel free to eat as much contaminated seafood as you wish

please feel free to deposit 19 or 20 pounds of co2 into the atmosphere with each gallon of gas you burn.

please explain why you believe Natural Resources Defense Council about seafood, but reject their position on global warming.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-12-24   15:13:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: lead.and.lag, PSUSA2, Original_Intent (#10)

please explain why you believe Natural Resources Defense Council about seafood

Please explain why you are so eager to squash this National Institute of Health study...

Seafood Contamination After the BP Gulf Oil Spill and Risks to Vulnerable Populations: A Critique of the FDA Risk Assessment

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-12-24   15:37:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: FormerLurker (#11) (Edited)

eager to squash

i'm not trying to quash anything.

it seems logical to me that, if original intent trusted the Natural Resources Defense Council about seafood, he'd also trust them about global warming.

full disclosure: i own a fleet of shrimp boats operating out of big piney, wyoming.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-12-24   15:42:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: lead.and.lag (#12)

Do you have any reason to doubt the NIH report?

I sympathize with your dilema concerning your shrimp business, but have you had your catch tested lately?

Oregon certainly doesn't need to worry about the chemicals found in the Gulf, but wouldn't it be a good idea to see what might be there just to be safe?

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-12-24   15:46:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: FormerLurker (#13)

i moved my fleet of shrimp boats to big piney, wymoming since your last post.

can you hear me now?

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-12-24   15:48:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 14.

#15. To: lead.and.lag (#14)

I think the issue is with Gulf shrimp. Good luck with moving the business to Wyoming though, are you going to trawl for crawdads in mountain streams or something?

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-12-24 15:50:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 14.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]