[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!


Health
See other Health Articles

Title: Seafood 10,000 Times Over Safe Limit for Carcinogenic Contamination, FDA Says to Eat it Anyway
Source: Activist Post
URL Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12 ... times-over-safe-limit-for.html
Published: Dec 23, 2011
Author: Mike Barrett
Post Date: 2011-12-23 21:55:32 by Original_Intent
Keywords: FDA, fraud, death, administration
Views: 418
Comments: 24

Seafood 10,000 Times Over Safe Limit for Carcinogenic Contamination, FDA Says to Eat it Anyway

Mike Barrett
Activist Post

Despite seafood showing extremely high levels of contamination, the FDA still deems the food safe for consumption.


The FDA not only falsely softened the risk of seafood consumption due to carcinogenic contaminants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the seafood supply, but also ignored individual FDA staff members who called for higher levels of contamination protection.

The oil spill into the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 was one of the largest offshore oil spills in history. One recent study conducted by researchers at the Natural Resources Defense Council found that FDA Gulf seafood “safe levels” actually allowed 100 to 10,000 times more carcinogenic PAHs in seafood than what is safe. This move by the FDA is not only only irresponsible for environmental and human safety, but puts those who are more vulnerable at a higher risk, such as pregnant women and children. 

FDA Says Yo Don’t Need to Remove Your Overly-Contaminated Seafood


Researchers who conducted the study, which was published in the top peer-reviewed environmental health journal Environmental Health Perspectives, found the information from snatched internal emails and unreleased assessments from the FDA under the Freedom of Information Act. The FDA argues that the reason they downplayed the risk is biased on the side of safety.

The director of the FDA has been reported stating “overly conservative estimates would lead you [to] remove a great deal of food from our refrigerators and pantries than is needed”

Seeing as consuming highly contaminated seafood is completely opposite of safe, this kind of response of course suggests that the FDA’s decision had little to do with safety, and was likely driven by political factors.


This wouldn’t be the first time that the FDA falsified or presented manipulated data. The agency also ignored the fact that mercury, an element that is highly toxic in all forms, was found in a large number of brand-name processed foods. But  instead of addressing this major public health concern, the FDA decided to focus their time on crushing beneficial supplements through ridiculous NDI regulations that threaten the entire infrastructure of the nutraceuticals industry.

In addition, the Food and Drug Administration has known for years that asthma drugs actually kill more patients than asthma itself, but they simply ignored this information. Similarly, data indicates that through the combination of rays from the sun and ingredients found in sunscreen, the skin can be damaged so much that lesions and tumors can be the end result. But of course the US Food and Drug Administration has allegedly been aware of this critical information for the past ten years, but has done absolutely nothing to warn people about it.


Explore More:

  1. Flu Shots Contain More than 250 Times the EPA’s Safety Limit for Mercury
  2. ‘DNA Barcoding’ to Regulate Seafood Industry Through Genetic Scanning
  3. Fraudulent Seafood | Are You Really Getting What You Think You Are?
  4. FDA Claims Power to Seize Food Without Evidence of Contamination
  5. Choose Between Carcinogenic Light Bulbs or Excessive Prices
  6. This Type of Factory Produces 100 Times More Waste than the Entire US Population Combined
Please visit Natural Society for more great health news and vaccine information.


Poster Comment:

The government is here to help you. Yeah, right.(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Original_Intent (#0) (Edited)

. One recent study conducted by researchers at the Natural Resources Defense Council found that FDA Gulf seafood “safe levels” actually allowed 100 to 10,000 times more carcinogenic PAHs in seafood than what is safe.

do you believe these people at the Natural Resources Defense Council?

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-12-23   22:08:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Original_Intent (#0)

it fits right in with the free pass monsanto gets with their GMO crops, at least the monsanto pass can be attributed to inbreeding. in that monsanto loses a lawyer the FDA gains a board director and vise-versa.


the most factual thing ever posted by buckeroo
I have no freaking' clue. buckeroo posted on 2010-07-24 21:33:00 ET

IRTorqued  posted on  2011-12-24   8:48:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: lead.and.lag (#1)

do you believe these people at the Natural Resources Defense Council?

Damn, you beat me to it!

Researchers who conducted the study, which was published in the top peer-reviewed environmental health journal Environmental Health Perspectives, found the information from snatched internal emails and unreleased assessments from the FDA under the Freedom of Information Act.

Ah yes, the FOIA. Where are these docs??? Could they have been invented by the Natural Resources Defense Council or the Environmental Health Perspectives??

Dumbasses like OI would have us all believe that we are already dead from this, Fukushima, all sorts of things. He is simply not a happy camper unless he is making the effort to get people to panic over bullshit like this. He has come up with some real doozies.

Where are the docs?

--------------------------------------------------------
Somebody ought to tell the truth about the Bible. The preachers dare not, because they would be driven from their pulpits. Professors in colleges dare not, because they would lose their salaries. Politicians dare not. They would be defeated. Editors dare not. They would lose subscribers. Merchants dare not, because they might lose customers. Men of fashion dare not, fearing that they would lose caste. Even clerks dare not, because they might be discharged. And so I thought I would do it myself... Robert Ingersoll

PSUSA2  posted on  2011-12-24   9:06:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: PSUSA2 (#3)

my point was this:

if original intent believes the Natural Resources Defense Council about dangerous shellfish, does he believe them about global warming?

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-12-24   12:11:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Original_Intent (#0)

I don't believe a thing the government says about anything.

"There are only 800,000 state, local, and federal law enforcement officers in the entire country." - Vox Day

Turtle  posted on  2011-12-24   12:12:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: lead.and.lag (#4)

If he doesn't have the same beliefs as that .org re: GW, it just goes to show how selective some people are.

These .orgs (and "alternative" news .orgs like infowars) are just as likely to lie to advance their agenda as the government is. The ends justify the means, right?

--------------------------------------------------------
Somebody ought to tell the truth about the Bible. The preachers dare not, because they would be driven from their pulpits. Professors in colleges dare not, because they would lose their salaries. Politicians dare not. They would be defeated. Editors dare not. They would lose subscribers. Merchants dare not, because they might lose customers. Men of fashion dare not, fearing that they would lose caste. Even clerks dare not, because they might be discharged. And so I thought I would do it myself... Robert Ingersoll

PSUSA2  posted on  2011-12-24   13:19:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: PSUSA2 (#6) (Edited)

"alternative" news .orgs like infowars) are just as likely to lie to advance their agenda

the big "respectable" alternative websites --commondreams, alternet, truthdig, antiwar-- seem to have been put toegether as limited hangouts...

you start getting down to the nitty gritty with them, you'll be banned.

the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth is intolerable, and so is any discussion that might lead to the truth.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-12-24   14:48:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: lead.and.lag (#7)

you start getting down to the nitty gritty with them, you'll be banned.

There is always "you're a .gov shill / .gov agent / sheeple" etc.

There's people pulling that crap here; particularly the "you're an agent" idiocy. When the proof is posted to refute what they say, or when no proof is presented by them to back up their claims, name calling is all they have to bolster their case. They take it personally when they aren't believed with reason(s). Butthurt little babies.

--------------------------------------------------------
Somebody ought to tell the truth about the Bible. The preachers dare not, because they would be driven from their pulpits. Professors in colleges dare not, because they would lose their salaries. Politicians dare not. They would be defeated. Editors dare not. They would lose subscribers. Merchants dare not, because they might lose customers. Men of fashion dare not, fearing that they would lose caste. Even clerks dare not, because they might be discharged. And so I thought I would do it myself... Robert Ingersoll

PSUSA2  posted on  2011-12-24   15:01:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: lead.and.lag (#4)

if original intent believes the Natural Resources Defense Council about dangerous shellfish, does he believe them about global warming?

It is data. Another point to compare to other data points. I take anything any Foundation supported group utters with a grain of salt, or a dash of petroleum, and compare it to other data.

And bringing up Glowbull Warming is a Red Herring as it has nothing to do with this particular report which is buttressed by other reports from other sources.

However, please feel free to eat as much contaminated seafood as you wish. Maybe with a dash of Fukushima Sauce. After all Supreme Reichskank Coulter says its good for you to get a few radionuclides in your tea.

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-12-24   15:09:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Original_Intent (#9) (Edited)

However, please feel free to eat as much contaminated seafood as you wish

please feel free to deposit 19 or 20 pounds of co2 into the atmosphere with each gallon of gas you burn.

please explain why you believe Natural Resources Defense Council about seafood, but reject their position on global warming.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-12-24   15:13:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: lead.and.lag, PSUSA2, Original_Intent (#10)

please explain why you believe Natural Resources Defense Council about seafood

Please explain why you are so eager to squash this National Institute of Health study...

Seafood Contamination After the BP Gulf Oil Spill and Risks to Vulnerable Populations: A Critique of the FDA Risk Assessment


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-12-24   15:37:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: FormerLurker (#11) (Edited)

eager to squash

i'm not trying to quash anything.

it seems logical to me that, if original intent trusted the Natural Resources Defense Council about seafood, he'd also trust them about global warming.

full disclosure: i own a fleet of shrimp boats operating out of big piney, wyoming.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-12-24   15:42:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: lead.and.lag (#12)

Do you have any reason to doubt the NIH report?

I sympathize with your dilema concerning your shrimp business, but have you had your catch tested lately?

Oregon certainly doesn't need to worry about the chemicals found in the Gulf, but wouldn't it be a good idea to see what might be there just to be safe?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-12-24   15:46:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: FormerLurker (#13)

i moved my fleet of shrimp boats to big piney, wymoming since your last post.

can you hear me now?

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-12-24   15:48:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: lead.and.lag (#14)

I think the issue is with Gulf shrimp. Good luck with moving the business to Wyoming though, are you going to trawl for crawdads in mountain streams or something?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-12-24   15:50:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: FormerLurker (#15)

merry christmas, formerlurker

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-12-24   15:53:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: lead.and.lag (#12)

full disclosure: i own a fleet of shrimp boats operating out of big piney, wyoming.

lol.....Big Piney is infamous for shrimping.

" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11

"Life's tough, and even tougher if you're stupid." --John Wayne

abraxas  posted on  2011-12-24   15:55:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: FormerLurker (#11)

Please explain why you are so eager to squash this National Institute of Health study...

Because that is what I am paid to do. I squash things, for my masters.

Comparison of measured levels of PAHs in Gulf seafood with the revised levels of concern, revealed that up to 53% of Gulf shrimp samples were above levels of concern for pregnant women who are high end seafood consumers.

Is this one of those deals where Pepsi is a cancer risk, if you drink 50 gallons a day?

What is a "level of concern? Is that better than a "level of terror" and worse than a level of "Better be careful"?

--------------------------------------------------------
Somebody ought to tell the truth about the Bible. The preachers dare not, because they would be driven from their pulpits. Professors in colleges dare not, because they would lose their salaries. Politicians dare not. They would be defeated. Editors dare not. They would lose subscribers. Merchants dare not, because they might lose customers. Men of fashion dare not, fearing that they would lose caste. Even clerks dare not, because they might be discharged. And so I thought I would do it myself... Robert Ingersoll

PSUSA2  posted on  2011-12-24   16:04:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: PSUSA2, FormerLurker (#18)

GREAT TECHNIQUE!

If you can't refute something start trying to confuse the issues.

So, just start throwing stuff against the wall hoping people will look at the "decorations" rather than the data you are trying to divert from.

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-12-24   16:26:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: PSUSA2 (#18)

What is a "level of concern? Is that better than a "level of terror" and worse than a level of "Better be careful"?

--------------------------------------------------------

Tell ya what. Go down to Louisiana, buy up a good 20 pounds or so of Gulf shrimp, cook them up, and eat them. Let us know how you feel the next day or so.

You can be the 4um research scientist, just think of the prestige.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-12-24   18:19:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: lead.and.lag (#16)

merry christmas, formerlurker

You too lead.and.lag.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-12-24   18:21:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: FormerLurker (#20)

I had shrimp several times since the spill.

I no longer have a third arm, and the 2 extra fingers growing out of my left leg fell off months ago.

--------------------------------------------------------
Somebody ought to tell the truth about the Bible. The preachers dare not, because they would be driven from their pulpits. Professors in colleges dare not, because they would lose their salaries. Politicians dare not. They would be defeated. Editors dare not. They would lose subscribers. Merchants dare not, because they might lose customers. Men of fashion dare not, fearing that they would lose caste. Even clerks dare not, because they might be discharged. And so I thought I would do it myself... Robert Ingersoll

PSUSA2  posted on  2011-12-24   18:27:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: PSUSA2, FormerLurker (#22)

Translation: You are going to continue to use disinformation tactics, such as intentional absurdity, rather than actually address what the data is telling us.

That seems clear enough. After all it is a classic disinformation tactic that I have seen used on forums oh, no more than a couple of thousand times.

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-12-24   19:00:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Original_Intent (#23) (Edited)

You are going to continue to use disinformation tactics, such as intentional absurdity, rather than actually address what the data is telling us.

what data

the nonexistent foia data? If they had it, it would be in the article, especially since they went thru so much 'trouble' to get it.

--------------------------------------------------------
Somebody ought to tell the truth about the Bible. The preachers dare not, because they would be driven from their pulpits. Professors in colleges dare not, because they would lose their salaries. Politicians dare not. They would be defeated. Editors dare not. They would lose subscribers. Merchants dare not, because they might lose customers. Men of fashion dare not, fearing that they would lose caste. Even clerks dare not, because they might be discharged. And so I thought I would do it myself... Robert Ingersoll

PSUSA2  posted on  2011-12-24   19:07:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]