See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: Uncut Ron Paul Interview - CNN Gloria Border
Source:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLonnC_ZWQ0&feature=g-all-f&c
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLon ... f&context=G205fe95FAAAAAAAAAAA
Published: Dec 24, 2011
Author: ronpaulcom
Post Date: 2011-12-24 14:11:09 by freepatriot32
Ping List: *libertarians* Subscribe to *libertarians*
Keywords: Uncut, Ron Paul Interview, CNN, Gloria Border
Views: 2610
Comments: 20
Wait, you mean that Ron Paul didn't walk off the set after 45 seconds? CNN finally released the full interview. It shows that Ron Paul didn't "storm off" - the interview was over. All the parts of this interview that make Gloria Borger look ridiculous were simply cut out of the heavily edited and misleading version that aired on CNN: http://www.youtube.com/watch? feature=player_embedded&v=i5LtbXG62es Propagandist Borger ends the interview with an outrageous insinuation and lie: "Some of this stuff was very incendiary, you know... saying that in 1993 the Israelis were responsible for the bombing of the World Trade Center". The newsletters, politically incorrect as they might have been, NEVER made such a claim. The corporate media will stop at nothing to discredit Ron Paul, but fortunately it's NOT working.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.
#2. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
Actually he did. In his April 1993 newsletter he reported this as the theory of "a Jewish friend" (does he really have any?). Considering that Ron Paul has been very cautious about accusing the Arabs of any wrongdoing, throwing in an accusation about Israel so casually is significant.
This is the effect that you and the other Anti-Ron Paul Jabberwockies are aiming for, isn't it Shoonra? The brain holds on to false facts, even after they have been retracted By Valerie Ross | July 18, 2011 [sic] what psychologists call the continued influence of misinformation—that people tend to have a hard time ignoring what they first heard, even if they know it is wrong [sic] “even if you understand, remember and believe the retractions, this misinformation will still affect your inferences,” says Western Australia psychologist Ullrich Ecker, an author of the study. Ron Paul is a subject of the Daily Paul website. That it bears his name does not mean he is the owner and author of it or officially affiliated with its content in any way. Some writings there might be considered controversial by whoever and some writings might not be correct. If he gets money contributed to him from the site and his supporters there, that does not mean he personally endorses their every view or everything the site endorses. Your link, Shoonra, is not evidence of any racism on Ron Paul's part or anything at all authored by him. It is evidence of Anti-Reagan interests, Anti- Arab/Muslim/Palestine interests, Cultural Marxist-interests of the PC Thought Police, and falsified/misleading/libelous/slanderous charges made by Anti-Ron Paul interests. This page of alleged "evidence" there never mentions Ron Paul's name anywhere, even in the heading that simply says, "Survival Report". For all we know, it could have been authored by you, Shoonra: The links for mrdestructo.com go to a site that says: The official blog of notorious former African dictator Mobutu Sese Seko And that's what you consider a credible source, Shoonra? This statement suggestively attributed to Ron Paul is evidence of a deliberate attempt by an imposter to set him up for defamation of character and harrassment assaults by the McMedia goonsquads to sabotage his political leadership: Actual evidence in rebuttal that shows he voted for Martin Luther King Day: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h1979-624 House Vote #624 (Dec 5, 1979) TO AMEND H.R. 5461, MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY, BY DESIGNATING THE THIRD MONDAY IN JANUARY RATHER THAN JANUARY 15 AS THE LEGAL HOLIDAY. Number: House Vote #624 in 1979 [data from Professor Keith Poole] Date: Dec 5, 1979 Result: Passed Related Bill: H.R. 5461 [96th]: A bill to designate the birthday of Martin Luther King, Junior, a legal public... Vote Overview Nay: 106 (25%) 33 [Democrats] 73 [Republicans] Not Voting: 32 (7%) 17 [Democrats] 15 [Republicans] Texas We could discuss all of the Republicans and all of the Democrats in the House and the Senate who didn't vote for any Martin Luther King Day legislation and why they didn't but Ron Paul wasn't one of them. What's the ludicrous reason, though, why Shoonra & Company are apparently far more concerned about Ron Paul's past than Obama's much murkier past, including his terrorist affiliations with and contributions from the Weather Underground? Admit it, Shoonra. This wrongful campaign to misrepresent Ron Paul as a racist is because your corner fears that he is the most electable GOP candidate and could win the Presidency by a huge margin. What you want to see is any of the least electable GOP candidates nominated so that inegligible Obama continues his usurpation of our Executive Branch -- yes or no?
#14. To: GreyLmist (#13)
Excellent commentary and good research work. Shoonra and his ilk/handlers want another buttwheat, if not buttwheat himself, because he and those like him are so easily handled, whereas Paul is still thinking for himself.
deleted
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#13. To: Shoonra, freepatriot32, titorite, FormerLurker, abraxas, Lod, Phant2000, Eric Stratton, bluegrass, Esso, All (#2)
http://hu1st.blogspot.com/2011/12/ron-paul-thinks-mossad-did-1993-world.html
Scientific American - Lingering Lies: The Persistent Influence of Misinformation
After people realize the facts have been fudged, they do their best to set the record straight: judges tell juries to forget misleading testimony; newspapers publish errata. But even explicit warnings to ignore misinformation cannot erase the damage done, according to a new study from the University of Western Australia.
"Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for that pro-communist philanderer, Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressman. What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day. Listen to a black radio talk show in any major city. The racial hatred makes a KKK rally look tame."
Aye: 291 (68%) 220 [Democrats] 71 [Republicans]
Aye TX-22 Paul, Ronald [R]
Replies to Comment # 13. Admit it, Shoonra. This wrongful campaign to misrepresent Ron Paul as a racist is because your corner fears that he is the most electable GOP candidate and could win the Presidency by a huge margin.
#15. To: GreyLmist (#13)
End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.
