Propagandist Borger ends the interview with an outrageous insinuation and lie: "Some of this stuff was very incendiary, you know... saying that in 1993 the Israelis were responsible for the bombing of the World Trade Center".
The newsletters, politically incorrect as they might have been, NEVER made such a claim.
The corporate media will stop at nothing to discredit Ron Paul, but fortunately it's NOT working.
Actually he did. In his April 1993 newsletter he reported this as the theory of "a Jewish friend" (does he really have any?). Considering that Ron Paul has been very cautious about accusing the Arabs of any wrongdoing, throwing in an accusation about Israel so casually is significant.
Actually he did. In his April 1993 newsletter he reported this as the theory of "a Jewish friend" (does he really have any?). Considering that Ron Paul has been very cautious about accusing the Arabs of any wrongdoing, throwing in an accusation about Israel so casually is significant.
1. Actually no he didn't.
2. Accusing Israel casually has no significant repercussions. What is Israel gonna do in retaliation? Insist upon being sent more money bombs and soldiers?