See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: Raw footage shows Ron Paul DIDN'T storm out of CNN interview over racist newsletters... the interview was simply done
Source:
Daily Mail
URL Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art ... ly-done.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
Published: Dec 25, 2011
Author: By Meghan Keneally
Post Date: 2011-12-25 10:58:36 by TwentyTwelve
Keywords: Ron Paul, CNN Distortion
Views: 808
Comments: 4
Raw footage shows Ron Paul DIDN'T storm out of CNN interview over racist newsletters... the interview was simply done By Meghan Keneally Last updated at 8:15 PM on 24th December 2011 Reports that Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul stormed out of a CNN interview earlier this week seem to be dramatically over-exaggerated. Raw footage of the Thursday interview shows that it lasted nearly ten minutes, which is not unusually brief on the campaign trail. After discussing foreign policy, the payroll tax, negative advertisements, and super fund PACs, the interview concluded with three whole minutes of discussion on the issue of the incendiary racist and homophobic letters that were published in Mr Paul's name in the Eighties and Nineties. SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO Touchy: Earlier reports made it seem like Ron Paul stormed out of the interview, while the raw footage makes it seem like it was simply over Touchy: Earlier reports made it seem like Ron Paul stormed out of the interview, while the raw footage makes it seem like it was simply over Initial news reports made it seem that Mr Paul recited his one line response- that he didn't write the letters, that he didn't read them until about a decade after they were published, and that he disavows them- and stormed off, tossing away his microphone and charging out. The newly-released CNN footage shows something entirely different. After fielding repeated questions about the controversial newsletters, Mr Paul began wrapping up the interview. The footage was released on YouTube on the RonPaul.com channel and has the CNN logo in the bottom right hand corner. Calm: People first reported that Mr Paul stormed out when the controversial newsletters came up, but really he answered 3 full minutes of questions Understanding: Reporter Gloria Borger seemed sympathetic at the time but did not relent on her questions, nor did Mr Paul with his answers Understanding: Reporter Gloria Borger seemed sympathetic at the time but did not relent on her questions, nor did Mr Paul with his answers The CNN reporter, Gloria Borger, didn't even seem particularly upset or surprised that the interview was ending considering the fact that she was beginning to repeat the same questions on the issue presumably in hopes of receiving a new answer. The controversial newsletters in question were produced in 1993 and contained a series of racist statements, including 'We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational.' * Newly uncovered videos and letter show Ron Paul promoting 'racist' newsletters... long before he said he knew about them * Still not running for President? Donald Trump ditches GOP and eyes independent White House bid (a week after candidates refused to attend his debate) * Fox News commentator calls Obama a 'skinny, ghetto crackhead' on air It also called Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. a 'world-class philanderer,' and criticized the U.S. holiday bearing King's name as 'Hate Whitey Day'. Other targets included AIDs suffers and pro-Israel supporters. It was claimed that Mr Paul received $1million from the newsletters which were produced in his name and released while he was in a break from office. Contradictions: Paul is shown in 1995, left, and in 1988, right, discussing the contents of the controversial newsletters which began production in the 1980s Under fire: Texas congressman Ron Paul, now a contender for the Republican nomination for president, is coming under increasing criticism over the controversial 'racist' newsletters Under fire: Texas congressman Ron Paul, now a contender for the Republican nomination for president, is coming under increasing criticism This alleged payment was discussed in the CNN interview, and Ms Borger questioned him about the payment which he said he knew nothing about. 'If you know I made money off of them then you know more about my finances than I do,' he said. When Ms Borger pressed him on the issue that he might supposedly made a seven-figure sum for the work, he brushed it off as if he didn't know. 'I'd like to see that money,' he said hinting that he never had. Mailer: The scare-mongering letter written in 1993 lists far-fetched conspiracy theories and urges the reader to 'save their family' by forking out for the $99 subscription Mailer: The scare-mongering letter written in 1993 lists far-fetched conspiracy theories and urges the reader to 'save their family' by forking out for the $99 Controversy: A letter signed by Paul in 1993 warning of a 'coming race war' and soliciting the political newsletters has also been uncovered Controversy: The letter warning of a 'coming race war' and soliciting the 'racist' newsletters carries Ron Paul's signature, pictured As Mr Paul leads in the Iowa race less than two weeks before the long-awaited first primary, the letters have caused quite the firestorm. One that his competition is eager to embrace. Fellow Republican nominee Newt Gingrich took a swipe on Friday night as he slammed the Texas congressman for his handling of the old letters. 'These things are really nasty, and he didn’t know about it, wasn’t aware of it,' Mr Gingrich said. 'But he’s sufficiently ready to be president? It strikes me it raises some fundamental questions about him.' 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
What it comes down to is that the PTB are frightened of Ron Paul and what he stands for - honest government. A Ron Paul Presidency would remove the Zionazis from the highest tiers of the executive and could possibly have other implications for their infiltration of the U.S. Government. Certainly there would be no political pressure to NOT prosecute spies when they were caught. There are other implications - by re-setting the standard of abiding by the Constitution it would make it more difficult for a successor to again disregard it. So, the permutations become interesting as it would delay, and even possibly derail, the march toward tyranny. That those opposed to him can find only this one issue with which to attack him says a lot of GOOD things about Ron Paul. As for some of the alleged racist comments - well I'm sorry it is true that whites have a lot to fear from lower class blacks. If you want proof, and you are white, try taking a walk through "the 'hood" after dark. After you get out of intensive care write us about the "experience". I may be opposed to racism but I am also a realist and the is a seething cauldron of irrational hatred directed against other groups in the black community. The same holds true for the Latino community as the Latin gangs continue their racist attacks against blacks in LA. However, the irrational elements of our culture aside Ron Paul would be good for blacks even if he were a racist (which I do not believe him to be) because he espouses equal rights under the Constitution for all, and that protects and defends everyone's rights and freedom.
This is a link for Lod to the video you posted: Ron Paul: Damn It, Don't Ask Bout My Racist Writings. This is a comment at the video site: Answer: Unlike Newt, Ron Paul voted for Martin Luther King Day. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#2. To: TwentyTwelve (#1)
#3. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)
...the letters have caused quite the firestorm.
#4. To: Southern Style, Lod, All (#3)
"don't forget newt voted against mlk day. guess what paul voted on that."
Nay GA-6 Gingrich, Newton [R] | Aye TX-22 Paul, Ronald [R]
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest