See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: Sarah Palin: "Ron Paul Is Pro-Israel, He Just Wants To Protect Them In A Different Way"
Source:
http://www.youtube.com
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXCTPO586UM
Published: Jan 3, 2012
Author: Sussex County Angel
Post Date: 2012-01-03 21:08:16 by freepatriot32
Ping List: *Sarah Palin 2012* Subscribe to *Sarah Palin 2012*
Keywords: Sarah Palin, Ron Paul, Pro-Israel, libertarians
Views: 416
Comments: 36
Breitbart.tv Sarah Palin appeared on Fox News with Eric Bolling and discussed Ron Paul's foreign policy as it relates to the state of Israel. Do you think America supports Israel now by ordering Israel around?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.
#9. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
I can tell you all how Ron Paul wants to protect Israel. First, cut ties with them, both financially, and militarily. This frees Israel from our meddling in their affairs. Second, Let Israel fight its own battles, and whether we know it or not, they can do just fine without us.
First, cut ties with them, both financially, and militarily. This frees Israel from our meddling in their affairs. Second, Let Israel fight its own battles, and whether we know it or not, they can do just fine without us. Paul has never said that. And, it doesn't benefit his campaign to bootstrap our political "visions of sugarplums dancing in our heads" onto his ascension. First, Sarah is equivocating because so many of the people she's spoken with applaud Paul's views that she's trying to win their support without alarming the Kosher brave and Zio tuff....yet. And if "Iron Man Ron's Unstoppable Monster Juggernaut" continues just watch Sarah do a flip flop that will put David ("Basically, I've always been a conservative") Gergen in silk taffeta short pants. I hope she can handle killer splinters from straddling that split rail fence. If she doesn't come back with a scathing attack on Paul soon we can expect to see pix of the Alaskan Slut Queen's sword swallowing act, perhaps with a dark skinned, Ghurkha-wielding Democrat. (Oliver Cromwell's piked head was put on display-see below) Paul knows that the best thing we can do to protect our interests (gasp) is to stop subsidizing the dehumanization, the serial and mass murders, the "Willy Peter" bombings, the starvation and relegation to untreated disease clusters and forced misery of people who refuse to bow their knees to the most ghastly horrors imaginable. And as president Dr. Ron could provide a platform for Jimmy Carter and others to simply tell the truth that Americans will never hear through ZioVision Cable or broadcast TV or radio. If America led the way to peace by example it would save countless trillions in interest for the needless use of the various central banks' digital units and paper currency. And, it would also save many Allied and American veterans from death or worse, wishing they were dead and lacking the physical or mental ability to end their pain-racked, Gothic horror story lives. Of course this would end a long, prosperous run for The Daddy WarBucks Club and The Defense Contractors Guild, and muscle serious plunge cuts through the gristle of the bribery and graft for our esteemed political caste. That will not happen without many attempts to trick us into war through assassinations, bombings and/or chemical weapons attacks on kindergartens and cheerleading camps, with "the 19 suspects being quickly identified after they make good their escape to the nation that offers them sanctuary-you know, "the emerging nukular threat that we should have bombed into the stone age when we had the chance". Once awakened and presented with strong leadership, if Americans demonstrate but a measure of the resolve of the Palestinians and others who have refused to buckle under Zionist psychopathy we could truly be the saviors of the world for all posterity. (And with no one to hate as foreign policy The Conservatives for Our Lord, The Blue-Suited, Ass Kickin' Hostile Takeover Jesus could wash others in the blood of the lamb instead of plotting the course of a new river of spilt blood between The Tigris and The Euphrates) An ancient, B&W drawing of the skillful job on Cromwell's head versus color photos of Palin's skillful black in white head job-politically speaking, a distinction with very little difference. Rotate the pike CCW roughly 85° and color it black for Sarah. Get it?)
Jimmy Carter and "the truth" should never be mentioned together in the same sentence or even in the same paragraph. Jimmy Carter knows about as much "truth" as a hog knows about calculus and physics. I say this because he campaigned on a promise that he "would never lie to the American people." Politicians should never say something like that as long as there are any investigative reporters still alive. Craig Karpel tore him apart in an article that appeared in Penthouse (iirc) called "The First 100 Lies of Jimmy Carter." Not to put too fine a point on it I would not stand on one leg and hold my breath waiting for Jimmy Carter to tell the truth about anything.
I was referring to this: Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid Carter was a comfortably retired, continent hopping senior statesman who decided to risk a plane crash or all consuming home fire when he launched his literary missile at those cutthroats. And, I'd hate to think that anyone who had ever told untruths would be automatically disqualified from the fight. After all, can we not be better men today than we were yesterday? Now my friend, if the standard you've set is, '...he campaigned on a promise that he "would never lie to the American people."' am I to assume that any other president who made no such promise is forgiven his lies and you hold one or more of them up as otherwise exempliary? Or, were you particularly hurt by Carter's letdown because of a particular pre-election promise that was a lie? My recollection of his term was as a pisswilly house sitter until Reagan arrived. And, the botched rescue attempt of the hostages really caused his stock to drop on my bookmaking pad. His presidency was a bloody disaster, and then when I learned that he was Rockefeller's boy and was announced as "The next president" at the Bilderberger Orgy 2 years before the election I really despised him. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy I don't know Mearsheimer's or Walt's political affiliation(s) nor do I care. I do know that their book rattled the Zio crazies' cages so badly that Alan Dershowitz nearly called for a Mossad hit team on national TV. And, Jimmy Carter's book forced Dershowitz to ejaculate the most absurd things that out of sheer gratitude I wanted to shake the hand of the most namby pamby, ineffectual president in my lifetime. When it comes to throwing running blocks for Ron Paul I'm a single issue lineman. And, believe me, your disdain for JC's presidency may be (=) to mine, but it's certainly not (>). This post ain't about that. There was JC the wimpy, 20th century Rockefeller lickspittle president, and then there's JC the 21st century Whack-A-Mole Heeb Hunter and author of a New York Times Best Seller. Hell, any Rockefeller-Brzezinski stooge can occupy The White House for a single term, and unless he's caught with a dead girl or a live boy he will complete a single term. But few human beings with the notoriety and influence to penetrate the Zionist censorship of everything we see, read and hear will ever have the courage to do so. Does this account for anything, my friend?
Now my friend, if the standard you've set is, '...he campaigned on a promise that he "would never lie to the American people."' am I to assume that any other president who made no such promise is forgiven his lies and you hold one or more of them up as otherwise exempliary? Or, were you particularly hurt by Carter's letdown because of a particular pre-election promise that was a lie? My recollection of his term was as a pisswilly house sitter until Reagan arrived. And, the botched rescue attempt of the hostages really caused his stock to drop on my bookmaking pad. His presidency was a bloody disaster, and then when I learned that he was Rockefeller's boy and was announced as "The next president" at the Bilderberger Orgy 2 years before the election I really despised him.
I'm having trouble with your posts because of two things; What if any president did you trust and respect, and does Carter's book about Palestine carry no weight at all with you?
Not that I ever knew them personally but I thought Washington and Jefferson were pretty good presidents. In my lifetime the only president America had that was worth anything much was probably John Kennedy (in my opinion). And no, when I know someone has lied to me over and over I stop listening to anything they say and I have not read Carter's book (nor do I intend to).
And no, when I know someone has lied to me over and over I stop listening to anything they say and I have not read Carter's book (nor do I intend to). There is something you're not telling me because I just don't see "Carter the Big Whopper Teller" as being so much worse than LBJ, (Landslide Lyndon) Nixon, (I am not a crook) Ford (remember his Warren Commission lies?) Reagan, ("I was out of The Loop-never heard of The Contras") Bush The Wimpier ("Yeah, I was in Dallas that day, So what?") and Bush The Stoopider, (Oh where to begin) Clinton (same) or Obama (unbelievable and he's just getting started) Could you bear with me a little longer and please tell me just what lies struck you so hard between 1976 and 1980 as to put Carter in a category all his own? And BTW, the term senior statesman was used to describe "Pardon Me Nixon" after he emerged as the "peacemaker" with China. He opened the door to cheep labur for his PUB buddies, and that factored into the collapse of American heavy industry and manufacturing that's killing us today. He's the reason why Rockwell, the last word in machine shop engines for most of the 20th century is now a shameful American label for Chinese CNC lathes and mills. And when you ponder China's having cornered the aluminum smelting and alloying market, think Nixon. So, "senior statesman" is not a flattering description. It's reserved for peeps like Vladimer Posner, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger. Have you seen it used to describe someone that you respect, or were you just being twitchy because it sounds like a term that's used for modern day Jeffersonians? (it isn't-there aren't any)
Have you ever seen me post a flattering word or even a good word about any of the crooks and charlatans you mentioned? I don't think so. But the fact remains that Carter made an explicit campaign promise that he "would never lie to the American people." Despite the fact that they all lie, at least all we have had in modern times (and the others probably did too depending on what it was about), Carter was the only one who made an issue of it. I figured he was lying when he said it and found that he would rather climb a splintered lightpole barefoot than to tell the truth. For whatever it's worth I know the term "senior statesmen" is applied to people it shouldn't be. But just because the "news readers" do stupid $#it like that doesn't mean we have to. The only actual statesman I know of in Washington is Ron Paul.
Very good. Once I learned that Ol' Peanut was a Rockefeller protegee I drew a line through his name. And it's only because Rockefeller and Rothschild have taken opposite sides of the Zionist power grab that Carter's book was on the NY Times Best Seller list.. But, I don't care WHY he did it or how he got there. (Rockefeller had the power to place Carter in The White House but then David was clueless how to consolidate power by manipulating "I cannot tell a lie" Carter once he did) The important thing is Carter dared to resist Alan Dershowitz and The American Dual Citizens' Cabal, and he labeled them as the manipulating liars that they are. And it provided a powerful rebuttal to most Southern and some Indie ZioBabtists who seem to believe that no sacrifice is too great for IZRULL. Carter was once the greatest threat to America but that was 35 years ago. The greatest threat now is Zio mind control and political manipulation.
There are no replies to Comment # 30. End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#11. To: TommyTheMadArtist, freepatriot32, James Deffenbach, christine, Jethro Tull, X-15, F.A. Hayek Fan, Original_Intent, Ferret, TwentyTwelve, Deasy (#9)
I can tell you all how Ron Paul wants to protect Israel.
#13. To: HOUNDDAWG (#11)
And as president Dr. Ron could provide a platform for Jimmy Carter and others to simply tell the truth
#18. To: James Deffenbach (#13)
Jimmy Carter and "the truth" should never be mentioned together in the same sentence or even in the same paragraph. Jimmy Carter knows about as much "truth" as a hog knows about calculus and physics. I say this because he campaigned on a promise that he "would never lie to the American people." Politicians should never say something like that as long as there are any investigative reporters still alive. Craig Karpel tore him apart in an article that appeared in Penthouse (iirc) called "The First 100 Lies of Jimmy Carter." Not to put too fine a point on it I would not stand on one leg and hold my breath waiting for Jimmy Carter to tell the truth about anything.
#20. To: HOUNDDAWG (#18)
(Edited)
Carter was a comfortably retired, continent hopping senior statesman who decided to risk a plane crash or all consuming home fire when he launched his literary missile at those cutthroats. And, I'd hate to think that anyone who had ever told untruths would be automatically disqualified from the fight. After all, can we not be better men today than we were yesterday?
#22. To: James Deffenbach (#20)
Seriously, I wouldn't trust Jimmy Carter as far as I could throw him. But as Shirley Q. Liquor says, "To each they own." I don't tell other folks who to admire/like/appreciate or whatever. But to answer your question, no, I was not let down by Carter. I figured he was lying when he made that promise. Karpel's article just proved something I already suspected which was that Jimmy Carter was a professional liar.
#26. To: HOUNDDAWG (#22)
What if any president did you trust and respect, and does Carter's book about Palestine carry no weight at all with you?
#28. To: James Deffenbach (#26)
Not that I ever knew them personally but I thought Washington and Jefferson were pretty good presidents. In my lifetime the only president America had that was worth anything much was probably John Kennedy (in my opinion).
#29. To: HOUNDDAWG (#28)
There is something you're not telling me because I just don't see "Carter the Big Whopper Teller" as being so much worse than LBJ, (Landslide Lyndon) Nixon, (I am not a crook) Ford (remember his Warren Commission lies?) Reagan, ("I was out of The Loop-never heard of The Contras") Bush The Wimpier ("Yeah, I was in Dallas that day, So what?") and Bush The Stoopider, (Oh where to begin) Clinton (same) or Obama (unbelievable and he's just getting started)
#30. To: James Deffenbach (#29)
Carter was the only one who made an issue of it. I figured he was lying when he said it and found that he would rather climb a splintered lightpole barefoot than to tell the truth.
Replies to Comment # 30.