[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Panic In Israel As Hezbollah Expands Attack Strategy, Changes Targets: '2 Million Israelis At Risk'

Why Does Kamala Harris Keep Repeating This Quote? - (Karl Marx Origins)

Re-Visiting Deagel 2025 Population Forecast: An Accidental Warning?

NHS Whistleblower: We Were Instructed to Euthanize Patients to Inflate COVID Death Toll While Hospitals Sat Empty!

America Obliterates Half North Vietnam's MiG-21 Fleet In 13 Minutes - Operation Bolo

Fully Autistic at 3 but by age 6 he was symptom-free and back to being a normal kid

We Are at War, You Got An Enemy, Stop Depending on Your Enemy (Money Laundering)

A mass shooting in Birmingham, Alabama’s Five Points South left 4 dead, 25 injured,

Brilliant takedown of how lost the Democratic Party is from a former Democrat

KY Sheriff Shot Judge because Judge was R*ping his Daughter

Arrested by Kamala: A Black Mother's Story

Israeli Media Fear Houthis Have Arrived on Israel's Border as Militia Touts Readiness for 'Long War'

KAMALA’S AMERICA: Violent Squatters Take Over Massive Mansion in Wealthy Los Angeles Neighborhood

Walk/Don't-Walk - In Which States Do Citizens Stroll The Most?

U.S. Poverty Myth EXPOSED! New Census Report Is Shocking Capitol Hill

August layoffs soared to 15-year high, marking a 193% increase from July.

NYPD Faces Uncertain Future Amid New York's Growing Political Crisis

Whitney Webb: Foreign Intelligence Affiliated CTI League Poses Major National Security Risk

Paul Joseph Watson: What Fresh Hell Is This?

Watch: 50 Kids Loot 7-Eleven In Beverly Hills For Candy & Snacks

"No Americans": Insider Of Alleged Trafficking Network Reveals How Migrants Ended Up At Charleroi, PA Factory

Ford scraps its SUV electric vehicle; the US consumer decides what should be produced, not the Government

The Doctor is In the House [Two and a half hours early?]

Trump Walks Into Gun Store & The Owner Says This... His Reaction Gets Everyone Talking!

Here’s How Explosive—and Short-Lived—Silver Spikes Have Been

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses

Asia Not Nearly Gay Enough Yet, CNN Laments

Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses on Harris (VIDEO)

Biden-Harris Admin Sued For Records On Trans Surgeries On Minors


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Minimum Wage Laws Crippling Small Business
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.wealthwire.com/news/economy/2459?r=1
Published: Jan 5, 2012
Author: Brittany Stepniak
Post Date: 2012-01-05 07:35:25 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 382
Comments: 30

David Frias, 34, works at a popular movie theatre in San Francisco. He is a graduate of San Francisco State University whose dream is to film documentaries in the future. Right now, he only makes minimum wage; which is pretty darn good, actually.

Lucky for him, he just received a pay increase as the minimum wage increased from $9.92 per hour up to $10.24 an hour. That 32 cents extra is a “psychological boost,” according to Mr. Frias:

"I know I'm going to have a little extra money in my wallet. San Francisco is a model for low-wage workers - it's full respect, I guess."

Surely a psychological boost is just that. It sounds good and feels good, but the actual minimum wage increase won't really be able to do all that much to improve workers' lives.

While Mr. Frias may be delighted by the recent change, his employer – along with all other small businesses in the area – will suffer the consequences. An increased minimum wage simply means higher costs for business owners trying to build a successful business...

Frias also spends some of his time volunteering with the San Francisco Living Wage Coalition. According to their data, there are approxiamtely 19,999 other minimum wage workers right in the San Francisco vacinity. Job titles of these workers inlude fast food workers, janitors dishwashers at high-end restaurants, store clerks, and security guards.

The coalition was among the original backers of the 2003 ballot measure that created a citywide minimum wage in San Francisco, the nation's third city to adopt its own wage after Washington and Santa Fe, N.M.

Some small cities have followed suit, though several have a livable wage that applies only to businesses that contract with the city.

The coalition calls for a "living wage" when considering what the minimum wage should be.

living wage *Image courtesy of the San Francisco Living Wage Coalition.

Meanwhile, the federal minimum wage holds steady at $7.25 and the state minimum is at $8 an hour. In San Francisco, officials look to the previous year's Consumer Price Index for urband workers in order to dictate an appropriate minimum wage. In 2004, the calculated minimum wage was $8.50 per hour in San Francisco. It's been rising exponentially ever since...

Bottom line's rise by year, compiled by the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement: 2004 $8.50 2005 $8.62 2006 $8.82 2007 $9.14 2008 $9.36 2009 $9.79 2010 $9.79 2011 $9.92 2012 $10.24

If you look around the country, minimum wage begins at half of San Francisco's rate; $5.15 an hour (Wyoming). On the East Coast, states offer about $7.25 an hour (Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, New York, North Carolina). It's about the same in the Midwest; slightly less in some areas. On the West Coast, wages are closer to the $8 range: $8.00 in California, $8.80 in Oregon and $9.04 in Washington.

Still, the coalition argues that the city would have to agree to pay minimum wage workers at least $15 per hour to bring a single individual out of poverty status. Moreover, an employer would have to offer an employee at least $36 per hour in order for a single parent with a child or two to survive above the poverty line.

It's simply not feasible to bring individuals out of poverty by increasing the minimum wage and hindering the growth of businesses with great potential; especially not when companies are forced to halt hiring based on absurd minimum wage rates.

Employers are angry with the $10.24 wage rate. And the entire community should be concerned too.

Keep in mind that the employers are required to provide nine paid sick days, provide health care (if there are over 20 employees), and pay a 1.5 percent payroll tax. These strict stipulations make it tough for them run a sustainable business and greatly hinders the possibility for development.

Therefore, this most recent pay increase as another burden of doing business in San Francisco. A couple extra dollars per shift won't make a big difference for the workers at all...but it will deeply impact the expenses of buisness owners.

"I hate it," Daniel Scherotter said of the city's highest-in-the-country minimum wage.

He's the chef and owner of Palio D'Asti, an Italian restaurant in the Financial District, and a previous president of the Golden Gate Restaurant Association.

Scherotter said the minimum wage is "plainly unjust" because California is one of a handful of states that prohibit a tip credit, meaning waiters earn the same minimum wage even though they receive tips.

Experts say this ultimately puts San Francisco at a competitive disadvantage. Employers are forced to cut staff, reduce the quality of food and products by doing so, and they're hiring less teenagers immigrants and ex convicts.

"Who the hell would hire a teenager for $12 an hour?" - Daniel Scherotter, chef and owner of Palio D'Asti, an Italian restaurant in the Financial District and former president of the Golden Gate Restaurant Associate

*Indented excerpts courtesy of the San Francisco Chronicle.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

#1. To: Tatarewicz, *Music Club* (#0)

What Living On $7 An Hour Actually Means

In this clip, award-winning journalist Barbara Ehrenreich gets to the root of what it means to be nickel and dimed by the 1%. Watch:

Nickel and Dimed from The American Ruling Class! -- Musical operetta starts soon after the 3:50 mark.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-01-05   8:42:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: GreyLmist, Tatz, 4 (#1)

Does anyone here know anyone who makes minimum wage?

I'm trying to imagine what kind if work would command only $7.25, and then, the type person who would accept that wage.

Lod  posted on  2012-01-05   9:00:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Lod (#2)

Does anyone here know anyone who makes minimum wage?

Most of the people I know make more -- like $10 an hour. And they are on food cards, medical cards, Section 8 housing. And people want to cut the minimum wage? How about cutting welfare for the superrich?

Turtle  posted on  2012-01-05   13:31:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Turtle, All (#3)

Most of the people I know make more -- like $10 an hour. And they are on food cards, medical cards, Section 8 housing. And people want to cut the minimum wage? How about cutting welfare for the superrich?

How about a corresponding increment in pay to those who've worked years to rise above minimum wage, only to get rolled back closer and closer to it every time the minimum wage is increased for cost of living but not their paychecks as well? That arrangement by act of Congress, like Affirmative Action, is Unconstitutional in that it amounts to a Bill of Attainder, having a negative effect on a single person or group -- in this case, the entire group whose payscale is negatively impacted ratiowise by no cost of living compensation to them. Minimum wage is far from what I'd call a fairly livable wage in this country but the real issue as I see it is that the feudalistic monetary system in this country needs to be zoned out of our way, as it is a violation of the 8th Amendment prohibiting the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-01-05   15:29:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: GreyLmist (#7)

Minimum wage is far from what I'd call a fairly livable wage in this country but the real issue as I see it is that the feudalistic monetary system in this country needs to be zoned out of our way, as it is a violation of the 8th Amendment prohibiting the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment.

You got that exactly right considering the fiat dollar is worth about 7 cents. Instead of everybody worrying acbout what others are making per hour, they should only be concerned about their own wages. Nobody seems to be bitching about the prices continually going up. Nobody tells business to stop raising prices and quit goughing the people. They raise prices whenever they want and the minimum worker doesn't have that option.

ambi  posted on  2012-01-05   15:49:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: ambi (#10) (Edited)

Nobody tells business to stop raising prices and quit goughing the people. They raise prices whenever they want and the minimum worker doesn't have that option.

When minimum wage goes up, generally so do their prices to well compensate themselves -- and they get the added "pocket money" advatage of effectively lowering the payscale rates of their non-minimum wage workers back in that direction when those workers aren't allotted a cost of living raise likewise.

Businesses are basically tax collection centers where workers with particular skill sets gather to create value. It behooves the business to offer products and services at widely affordable ranges so that it gets a share of the money- value generated by the workers but the workers should be self-employed and companies contracting with them for their services (if the workers so choose) in order to remain in business. Iow, the workers should be the employers of non- human business structures and not the other way around. Don't have good ethics and business practices enough to stay in the market, the workers could then form their own tax collection centers as meeting places to produce value. I also think that children, students, the elderly, and the handicapped should be paid for participating in and contributing to the betterment of our society by all of the jobs their needs generate for the sustenance of others. They should not be viewed as expense burdens but partnerships and employers. There is much that could be done to improve conditions here but preserving a dysfunctional and cruel monetary system of Feudalism out of habit isn't one of them, imo.

Edited for spelling.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-01-05   16:33:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: GreyLmist (#12)

They should not be viewed as expense burdens but partnerships and employers. There is much that could be done to improve conditions here but preserving a dysfunctional and cruel monetary system of Feudalism out of habit isn't one of them, imo.

In an ideal world it would probably work that way. Too many of the small business owners want total control over their business and hate all the government laws that protect the workers. They feel since they took the risk of starting the business they should be able to run it as they see fit.

My mother worked in a shirt factory in Windber, PA as a presser (Ironing shirts) before electric irons and stay pressed fabrics and plastic bags. The pressers got paid 13 cents for every dozen shirts they ironed, pinned, and folded, and put in celophane bags. If you scorched a shirt in a dozen, you lost your 13cents for that dozen. There were about eight pressers and it was a rare happening if one of them made it through a ten hour day without scorching a sirt useing those old irons heated on a stove. If you scorched a shirt, the final inspector, an owners kid or pet, would take away the whole dozen, and you would have to start another dozen all over again. They didn't know what happened to that dozen, but they knew. So much for partnerships with business owners!

ambi  posted on  2012-01-05   19:19:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 16.

#21. To: ambi (#16)

They feel since they took the risk of starting the business they should be able to run it as they see fit.

That's where these business owners become subject to federal scrutiny as well as the state. If they are willing to risk starting a business, they must realize they are subject to the employment laws and regulations both federal and state.

purplerose  posted on  2012-01-05 23:32:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: ambi (#16)

My mother worked in a shirt factory in Windber, PA as a presser (Ironing shirts) before electric irons and stay pressed fabrics and plastic bags. The pressers got paid 13 cents for every dozen shirts they ironed, pinned, and folded, and put in celophane bags. If you scorched a shirt in a dozen, you lost your 13cents for that dozen. There were about eight pressers and it was a rare happening if one of them made it through a ten hour day without scorching a sirt useing those old irons heated on a stove. If you scorched a shirt, the final inspector, an owners kid or pet, would take away the whole dozen, and you would have to start another dozen all over again. They didn't know what happened to that dozen, but they knew. So much for partnerships with business owners!

ambi posted on 2012-01-05 19:19:25 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

Good reminder of what businesses will do if allowed.

Wait till we all work for Wall Mart and the Koch bros to see true happiness.

tom007  posted on  2012-01-06 11:24:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]