[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay Not much going on that I can find today In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?! Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort? Israelis Persecute Americans Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them Ghost Dancers and Democracy: Tucker Carlson Amalek (Enemies of Israel) 100,000 Views on Bitchute ICE agents pull screaming illegal immigrant influencer from car after resisting arrest Aaron Lewis on Being Blacklisted & Why Record Labels Promote Terrible Music Connecticut Democratic Party Holds Presser To Cry About Libs of TikTok Trump wants concealed carry in DC. Chinese 108m Steel Bridge Collapses in 3s, 16 Workers Fall 130m into Yellow River COVID-19 mRNA-Induced TURBO CANCERS. Think Tank Urges Dems To Drop These 45 Terms That Turn Off Normies Man attempts to carjack a New Yorker Test post re: IRS How Managers Are Using AI To Hire And Fire People Israel's Biggest US Donor Now Owns CBS 14 Million Illegals Entered US in 2023: The Cost to Our Nation American Taxpayers to Cover $3.5 Billion Pentagon Bill for U.S. Munitions Used Defending Israel The Great Jonny Quest Documentary This story About IRS Abuse Did Not Post CDC Data Exposes Surge in Deaths Among Children of Covid-Vaxxed Mothers

Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Inside the typical commercial jet engine, the fuel burns in the combustion chamber at up to 2000 degrees Celsius.
Source: stanford
URL Source: http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/ ... rojects/jet-airplanes/how.html
Published: Jan 7, 2012
Author: standford.edu
Post Date: 2012-01-07 23:14:01 by lead.and.lag
Keywords: None
Views: 2577
Comments: 85

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

#2. To: All (#0)

the temperatures inside a jet engine would eliminate the possibility of "chemtrail" bugs surviving combustion and reaching the atmosphere.

so "chemtrail" bugs would not be put into jet fuel.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2012-01-08   0:22:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

They use misters/aerosolizers on the trailing edge of the wings or control surfaces.

Give Me Liberty  posted on  2012-01-08   1:15:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

They use misters/aerosolizers on the trailing edge of the wings or control surfaces.

so you're saying those big white plumes coming from the engines are not "chemtrails"...

good enough

lead.and.lag  posted on  2012-01-08   1:19:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Evergreen Aviation Admits to Chemtrail Contracts with USAF

-video www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/meteorology evergreen-aviation-admits-tochemtrail-contracts-with-usaf.html

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-01-08   1:34:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Evergreen Aviation Admits to Chemtrail Contracts with USAF

how many supertankers does evergreen have?

do they have enough of them to account for all the "chemtrails" observed?

is there any evidence that evergreen has operated a supertanker on a weather modification contract?

lead.and.lag  posted on  2012-01-08   1:40:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

And why is a supertanker required.

You are attempting to assert a premise and have me accept it. I was born at night but it wasn't yesterday.

Evergreen has long been associated with the government - and appears to have CIA linkages. So, why don't you ask them about the contract? I'm sure they'd be more than forthcoming. Don't you think they would be if they had a classified above ridiculous contract?

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-01-08   1:46:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You are attempting

you are incapable of giving a straight answer to a straight question.

please post a link to the evergreen press release, especially including the "question and answer" portion of the press release, most especially including the part where evergreen admits it can control weather, and create hurricanes and earthquakes.

please.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2012-01-08   1:51:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Evergreen Link Happy reading.

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-01-08   1:59:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Evergreen Link

please post a link to the evergreen press release, especially including the "question and answer" portion of the press release, most especially including the part where evergreen admits it can control weather, and create hurricanes and earthquakes, as per the article from "forbidden knowledge" that you attemped to post a link to.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2012-01-08   2:02:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

please post a link to the evergreen press release,

What a ridiculous demand. We both know that CIA connected companies don't give press releases about top secret compartmentalized programs. The admission was inadvertent, and is documented online. Do your own research.

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-01-08   2:31:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

What a ridiculous demand.

you cant post evergreen's assertion that they can cause hurricanes and earthquakes, because that assertion was added by the writer on the doofus site you posted as a reference.

all we got to decide now is whether you are a fool for being sucked in, or you're deliberately trying to fuck people's minds up.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2012-01-08   2:35:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

No, I encourage people to think for themselves and not accept anything unexamined.

I have no burning compulsion that requires that people agree with me.

However you're still doing a great job of conforming to:

Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation

So far on this thread you have compiled an impressive list:

You began with a Strawman:

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

Then you have proceeded through several others:

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have no basis in fact.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

Please feel free to let me know if you think I've missed any.

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-01-08   2:45:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 31.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]