Title: Poll: who should be Ron Paul's running mate?? Source:
none URL Source:http://none Published:Jan 10, 2012 Author:X-15 Post Date:2012-01-10 13:50:29 by X-15 Keywords:None Views:1172 Comments:68
Assuming Paul gets the nomination -- or if he repeats his 2008 strategy and runs for a Third Party -- his VP choice should be VERY carefully made. Ron Paul will be, if elected, entering the White House almost the same age as Reagan was when he left it. With the oldest President ever in office, there's a very distinct likelihood that the VP will be elevated to the Presidency or at least the Acting Presidency. So I would think Paul's VP should be someone so good that they'd be elected President themselves.
Ron Paul will be, if elected, entering the White House almost the same age as Reagan was when he left it. With the oldest President ever in office, there's a very distinct likelihood that the VP will be elevated to the Presidency
yup.
if mckinney were vice president, you guys would for sure have to crank up your iran/north korea nuke false flag ploy, and eliminate the american government and its pretense at democracy... how bout a little israeli nuke going off at the state of the union speech?
who do you have in mind for dictator, once the current crop of zionist stooges is eliminated from the american government? ...bill kristol? ...eliot abrams? ...richard perle? ...scooter? ...angela keaton?
the last thing we need is a president that's willing to speak at least some o the ruth about israel, like mckinney.
if you guys decided it was time to go for all the marbles, you wouldnt need to televise the false flag, would you?
nope, eliminate the president, vice president, congress and lots of the military brass in one fell swoop, with a nuke at the state of the union speech, and have an apparatus already in place to take over, supported by the zionist media.
there'd be no need for saturation coverage of the actual event as it happened.