See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: Sen. Rand Paul Cuts $500K From His Office Budget, Returns it to Treasury
Source:
TheBlaze
URL Source: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/sen ... budget-returns-it-to-treasury/
Published: Jan 12, 2012
Author: Becket Adams
Post Date: 2012-01-12 21:21:31 by Dakmar
Keywords: None
Views: 82
Comments: 3
When freshman Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) was elected in 2010, he promised to cut federal spending. It looks like he’s making good on his promise. “The Kentucky Republican and tea-party favorite said Thursday he’s returning $500,000 to the U.S. Treasury – money from his operating budget that his office never spent,” writes Scott Wong of Politico, and “he contends no senator has returned as much to taxpayers.” Watch the entire press conference via courier-journal.com: U.S. Senators are appropriated $3 million a year for their office budgets and Sen. Paul has been able to save nearly 15 percent of his annual costs, according to WFLP News. How does he do it? Some would say frugality. “We look at all of our office expenses. We look at the coffee pot to the computers bought and we try to buy things as if it were our money we were spending, or your money that we were spending, and our goal is not to spend all of it, our goal is to save some of it,” Paul said. If Congress offered incentives for lawmakers and staff to cut budgets, the U.S. could save $130 million annually, Paul added. “I ran to stop the reckless spending. And I ran to end the damaging process of elected officials acting as errand boys, competing to see who could bring back the biggest check and the most amount of pork,” Paul said at a news conference in Louisville, where he presented taxpayers with a massive mock check for $500,000. Image Courtesy: WFPL News “I hope this sets an example for the rest of government – at all levels,” he added. “We can carry out our duties in a fiscally responsible way. Government can be both smart and efficient. We are proving that – and trying to convince the rest of Washington.” As Business Insider rightly points out, critics of Sen. Rand Paul will probably denounce him for returning the $500,000 and attack him for not using the money “to create jobs,” as Michael Brendan Dougherty of BI put it. However, these criticisms will probably fall on deaf ears. “Most American families have been forced to figure out how to do more with less, or how to do less altogether. It’s nice to see a Senator joining us,” Dougherty writes. Many would agree, and find this a very welcome change of pace.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#3. To: Dakmar (#0)
However, these criticisms will probably fall on deaf ears. Criticising him for not spending money wastefully to "make busy work" in his efficiently running office where the job isn't needed there is preposterous. That mindset is an example of why government is way too big and failing to do its job correctly. The money he returned to the Treasury saves the taxpayers even more by lowering the debt and amount of interest being paid on it. As he said, without cutting any services, there could be enough money for bridge repair (to create crucial infrastructure jobs and such if properly returned to the taxpayers, not used to senselessly inflate gov-office jobs for "make-work" appearances) if other public officials were frugal with their budgets and returning money too.
There are no replies to Comment # 3. End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestAs Business Insider
rightly points out, critics of Sen. Rand Paul will probably denounce him for returning the $500,000 and attack him for not using the money “to create jobs,” as Michael Brendan Dougherty of BI put it.
Replies to Comment # 3.