[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Elon Goes "DARK MAGA" - Joins Trump ON STAGE! Media Melt Down Ensues

The Truth About the Memphis Belle (No Hollywood)

JD Vance ENDS CNN Dana Bash’s Career LIVE on Air

Hell Let Loose - MOATS with George Galloway

Important Message: Our Country Our Choice

Israel is getting SLAUGHTERED in Lebanon, Americans are trapped | Redacted

Warren Buffett has said: “I could end the deficit in five minutes.

FBI seizes Diddy tape showing Hillary Clinton killing a child at a 'Freak Off' party

Numbers of dairy cow deaths from bird flu increasing to alarming rates

Elites Just Told Us How They'll SILENCE US!

Reese Report: The 2024 October Surprise?

Americans United in Crisis: Mules Carry Supplies to Neighbors Trapped by Hurricanes Devastation in NC

NC STATE POLICE WILL START ARRESTING FEDS THAT ARE BLOCKING AIDE FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES

France BANS ARMS SALES To Israel & Netanyahu LASHES OUT At Macron | Iran GETS READY

CNN Drops Bomb on Tim Walz, Releases Blistering Segment Over Big Scandals in His Own State

EU concerned it has no influence over Israel FT

How Israels invasion of Lebanon poses risks to Turkiye

Obama's New Home in Dubai?,

Vaccine Skeptics Need To Be Silenced! Bill Gates

Hillary Clinton: We Lose Total Control If Social Media Companies Dont Moderate Content

Cancer Patients Report Miraculous Recoveries from Ivermectin Treatment

Hurricane Aid Stolen By The State Of Tennessee?

The Pentagon requests $1.2bn to continue Red Sea mission

US security officials warn of potential threats within two weeks, ramped-up patrols.

Massive Flooding Coming From Hurricane Milton

How the UK is becoming a ‘third-world’ economy

What Would World War III Really Look Like? It's Already Starting...

The Roots Of The UK Implosion And Why War Is Inevitable

How The Jew Thinks

“In five years, scientists predict we will have the first ice-free Arctic summer" John Kerry in 2009


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Back to Google News Campaign officials: Huntsman to quit GOP race
Source: ap
URL Source: https://accounts.google.com/Service ... p/article/ALeqM5iVp8zQnO58su6g
Published: Jan 15, 2012
Author: ap
Post Date: 2012-01-15 22:03:06 by abraxas
Keywords: None
Views: 85
Comments: 5

Back to Google News Campaign officials: Huntsman to quit GOP race

Jon Huntsman will withdraw Monday from the race for the Republican presidential nomination, campaign officials told The Associated Press on Sunday.

Huntsman will endorse Mitt Romney at an event in South Carolina, the officials said. Huntsman believes Romney is the best candidate to beat President Barack Obama in November, they said.

The campaign officials spoke on condition of anonymity because Huntsman plans to make the official announcement Monday.

The former Utah governor placed third in last week's New Hampshire primary despite devoting most of his campaign resources to the state. He had already acknowledged that expectations for him in South Carolina's primary this week will be "very low."

Huntsman was routinely at the bottom of national polls, barely registering at 1 or 2 percent.

His resume suggested he could be a major contender for the GOP nomination: businessman, diplomat, governor, veteran of four presidential administrations, an expert on China and on foreign trade. With a personal fortune based on his family's global chemical company, he could be a late entry into the nomination contest without necessarily hobbling his campaign.

Yet Huntsman was almost invisible in a race often dominated by Romney, a fellow Mormon. One reason was timing. For months, Romney and other declared or expected-to-declare candidates drew media attention and wooed voters in early primary states. Huntsman, meanwhile, was half a world away, serving as ambassador to China until he resigned in late April. Nearly two more months would pass before his kickoff speech on June 22 in the shadow of the Statue of Liberty.

To distinguish his candidacy in a crowded field, Huntsman positioned himself as a tax-cutting, budget-balancing chief executive and former business executive who could rise above partisan politics. That would prove to be a hard sell to the conservatives dominating the early voting contests, especially in an election cycle marked by bitter divisions between Republicans and Democrats and a boiling antipathy for President Barack Obama.

Huntsman also tried to offer a different tenor, promising a campaign marked by civility. "I don't think you need to run down somebody's reputation in order to run for the office of president," he said.

While Huntsman was often critical of his former boss — he joined those saying Obama had failed as a leader — and occasionally jabbed at Romney, he spent more of his time in debates pushing his own views for improving the economy than thumping the president or his opponents.

In light of his work in the Obama administration, Republicans seemed wary of Huntsman. While he cast his appointment in August 2009 as U.S. ambassador to China as answering the call to serve his country, his critics grumbled that he had in fact been working on behalf of the opposition.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: abraxas (#0) (Edited)

Looks like Mittens is the demon of choice for the elite. They will torpedo him after he wins the GOP nomination and we will have 4 more years of the Barry Soetoro puppet.

If Ron Paul can't be our president then I actually prefer that Barry win a second term. My reasoning is that republicans in general are smarter than demoncats from my experience. The only thing that will wake up the small percentage of dementedcats that are capable of waking up is for the country to be taken totally to the sewer with a demoncat. Otherwise, if Mittens wins they will, just continue the mantra of "those damn repulsivans". I want Barry to get full credit for the destruction of this country.

We on this board all (well almost all) know that anyone but Paul for the GOP will destroy this country also, but it won't be as effective a wake up call if Mitten destroys it instead of Mr. Soetoro IMHO.

It is hard to free fools from the chains they revere. Voltaire

An ideal form of government is democracy tempered with assassination. Voltaire

intotheabyss  posted on  2012-01-15   22:12:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: intotheabyss (#1)

The elite tried and tried and tried to push Romney in 2008.....nobody wanted him and nothing has changed over 4 years. If he is the nominee, he can't beat Obama because he is the white Obama.

" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11

"Life's tough, and even tougher if you're stupid." --John Wayne

abraxas  posted on  2012-01-15   22:22:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: abraxas (#0) (Edited)

Huntsman also tried to offer a different tenor, promising a campaign marked by civility.

Wrong. His campaign was mainly a smear campaign against Ron Paul, who had not attacked him (Ref: The Ron Paul Chronicles). Then he tried to frame Ron Paul's supporters for the probable prank of his own camp( Ref: Who’s Really Behind Anti- Huntsman “Manchurian Candidate” Video?: if the video was nothing more than a joke for which Huntsman fell but good, then maybe voters should be asking the same question as Raimondo: “If Huntsman flies off the handle this easily, and can be taken in by a transparently obvious prank like this stupid video, then do we really want his finger on the nuclear trigger?”) Flashback to a Newsweek article on Huntsman posted January 1, 2011, titled: The Manchurian Candidate. When it was shown that Ron Paul's campaign wasn't picking on him, he accused Romney of doing that (Ref: Jon Huntsman, Mitt Romney, And Serving Your Country).

Edit: Newsweek article info.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-01-16   16:03:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: abraxas, All (#0)

"I don't think you need to run down somebody's reputation in order to run for the office of president," [Huntsman] said.

Huntsman, running down the entire state of Iowa's reputation in his run for the office of...China's Presidency?:

Jon Huntsman - Serial Obama -- says at 0:43-0:50, "They pick corn in Iowa. They actually pick presidents here in New Hampshire."

news.yahoo.com: Huntsman on Iowa absence: 'They pick corn in Iowa'

Associated Press – Thu, Dec 29, 2011

WASHINGTON (AP) — Former U.S. Ambassador Jon Huntsman is defending his refusal to compete in the leadoff Iowa Republican precinct caucuses, focusing instead on New Hampshire.

Huntsman tells CBS's "The Early Show" the formula, so far as he is concerned, is quite elementary. Says Huntsman: "They pick corn in Iowa. They actually pick presidents here in New Hampshire."

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-01-17   8:37:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: All (#3)

(Ref: Jon Huntsman, Mitt Romney, And Serving Your Country).

Some good comments at that article:

PD Shaw says: "I don’t equate serving in the military with serving in the President’s administration."

PD Shaw says: "I do believe this notion that Huntsman is some sort of super patriot, performing something akin to military service to his country, does not bear much weight. When Huntsman declined to accept an ambassadorship to Indonesia, was he not a patriot? When he resigned as ambassador to China was he betraying the country?"

MBunge says: "I think folks are being a little too naive over Huntsman and his time as ambassador. Can anyone think of an example of someone serving in the Presidential administration of another party and then trying to run for the Presidential nomination of his own party to oppose the very person under which he served? Can anyone think of someone who joined the administration of the other party, left it under good circumstances and then tried to seek political office of any kind? The whole crossing party lines thing has traditionally been something done when you’re ready to leave partisan politics behind in the first place.

The idea that Republican primary voters aren’t supposed to care that Huntsman’s most recent job was working for the Democratic President the GOP is trying to defeat seems a little ridiculous."

MBunge says: "The basic partisan fact is that Huntsman can’t strongly criticize Obama without having to explain why those criticisms weren’t enough to keep him from being a member of the Obama administration, thereby undercutting their weight and effectiveness."

jan says: "I looked up the transcripts from which Romney’s comment was taken. In context, it was Huntsman who made a snide remark about Romney throwing a tariff onto China, which then provoked the slur back from Romney — more of tit for tat, than really going after Huntsman for his “service” to this country.

HUNTSMAN: Listen, we have the most important relationship of the 21st Century with China. We’ve got to make it work. Of course we have challenges with them. We’ve had challenges for 40 years. It’s nonsense to think you can slap a tariff on China the first day that you’re in office, as Governor Romney would like to do.

You’ve got to sit down and sort through the issues of trade like you do with North Korea, like you do with Iran, like you do with Burma, and Pakistan, and the South China Sea. They’re all interrelated. And to have a president who actually understands how that relationship works would serve the interests of the people in this country, from an economics standpoint and from a security standpoint.

ROMNEY: I’m sorry, Governor, you were, the last two years, implementing the policies of this administration in China. The rest of us on this stage were doing our best to get Republicans elected across the country and stop the policies of this president from being put forward.

My own view on the relationship with China is this, which is that China is stealing our intellectual property, our patents, our designs, our know-how, our brand names. They’re hacking into our computers, stealing information from not only corporate computers but from government computers. And they’re manipulating their currency.

And for those who don’t understand the impact of that, I’ve seen it. I’ve seen it. And that is, if you hold down the value of your currency artificially, you make your products artificially low-priced and kill American jobs. That has happened here in this country.

And if I’m president of the United States, I’m not going to continue to talk about how important China is and how we have to get along. And I believe those things. They’re very important. And we do have to get along. But I’m also going to tell the Chinese it’s time to stop. You have to play by the rules. I will not let you kill American jobs any longer.

My note: Continuing with the transcript...

HUNTSMAN: I think it’s important to note, as they would say in China, that (speaking mandarin)...

(CROSSTALK)

HUNTSMAN: ... he doesn’t quite understand this situation. What he is calling for would lead to a trade war. It makes for easy talk and a nice applause line but it’s far different from the reality in the U.S.-China relationship.

You slap on tariffs, you talk tough like that. Of course you have, that has got to be part of it as well. But in the end, we get a tariff in return if we don’t sit down and have a logical, sensible conversation. And who does that hurt most? It hurts the small businesses and the small exporters are who trying to get back on their feet in this country in a time when this nation can least afford a trade war.

My note: Sounds strangely like Huntsman, former ambassador to China, is either oblivious to the very high tariffs that China has already slapped on some of our vehicle imports there or he doesn't object to China's trade war tactics against our businesses and exporters as long as America doesn't make any counter moves. Something to think about if he ever tries to run again for the Executive Branch here.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-01-17   9:51:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]