[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll

The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it.

The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means

New York's MTA Proposes $65.4 Billion In Upgrades With Cash It Doesn't Have

More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico

New York state reports 1st human case of EEE in nearly a decade

Oktoberfest tightens security after a deadly knife attack in western Germany

Wild Walrus Just Wanted to Take A Summer Vacation Across Europe

[Video] 'Days of democracy are GONE' seethes Neil Oliver as 'JAIL' awaits Brits DARING to speak up

Police robot dodges a bullet, teargasses a man, and pins him to the ground during a standoff in Texas

Julian Assange EXPOSED

Howling mad! Fury as school allows pupil suffering from 'species dysphoria' to identify as a WOLF

"I Thank God": Heroic Woman Saves Arkansas Trooper From Attack By Drunk Illegal Alien

Taxpayers Left In The Dust On Policy For Trans Inmates In Minnesota

Progressive Policy Backfire Turns Liberals Into Gun Owners

PURE EVIL: Israel booby-trapped CHILDRENS TOYS with explosives to kill Lebanese children

These Are The World's Most Reliable Car Brands

Swing State Renters Earn 17% Less Than Needed To Afford A Typical Apartment

Fort Wayne man faces charges for keeping over 10 lbs of fentanyl in Airbnb

🚨 Secret Service Announces EMERGENCY LIVE Trump Assassination Press Conference | LIVE Right Now [Livestream in progress]

More Political Perverts, Kamala's Cringe-fest On Oprah, And A Great Moment For Trump

It's really amazing! Planet chocolate cake eaten by hitting it with a hammer [Slow news day]

Bombshell Drops: Israel Was In On It! w/ Ben Swann

Cash Jordan: NYC Starts Paying Migrants $4,000 Each... To Leave

Shirtless Trump Supporter Puts CNN ‘Reporter’ in Her Place With Awesome Responses


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: Need some help ...
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 16, 2012
Author: -
Post Date: 2012-01-16 17:08:55 by Eric Stratton
Keywords: None
Views: 136
Comments: 6

Buddy of mine sent me this, said he was talking to his dad about income tax and his dad sent him this taking the contrarian view. I haven't had time to look at it, but I immediately got hung up at the beginning when it said something that to me rendered the entire analysis flawed.

I thought I'd throw this piece of red meat out there and then come back and see what it looks like in a bit a little later and before reading the entire piece.

******************

Income Tax Myths

"There's just no law requiring you to pay federal income taxes."

The most basic myth of tax protestors is that there is simply no law mandating the payment of income taxes. Frequently one can observe anti-tax types to say something like, “if only someone would show me the law that says that I have to file a tax return and pay taxes, I’d be happy to do it.” I have a strong suspicion that people who say that are not serious, but I’m going to take them at their word. Here are the laws that (a) impose an income tax on you, (b) require you to file an income tax return, and (c) require you to pay taxes:

§ 1

 

 

The federal tax laws are contained in the Internal Revenue Code, also known as Title 26 of the United States Code, which is the compilation of laws passed by the Congress (“Title” basically means “Volume” when applied to the U.S. Code as a whole, so Title 26 is what might more casually be called Volume 26).

The Internal Revenue Code is the law that requires people to pay taxes (and yes, the Internal Revenue Code is the law -- for more detail on this point click here).

The most important statutory provision with regard to income taxes is section one of the tax code, 26 U.S.C. § 1. This is the section that actually imposes the income tax. It’s very simply written. If you are unmarried, the relevant provision is § 1(c), which states:

26 U.S.C. § 1
There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every individual . . . who is not a married individual a tax determined in accordance with the following table:

followed by a table specifying the tax rates on various income amounts. If you are married, you are covered by the similar provision at § 1(a). There are also a couple of other possible filing statuses covered elsewhere in § 1 (such as “head of household”), but the basic point is that section 1 imposes an income tax.
§ 61 and § 63

 

 

Section 1, it will be observed, imposes the tax on your “taxable income.” How do you know what that is? Section 63 of the Code, 26 U.S.C. § 63, defines “taxable income” to mean “gross income minus the deductions allowed” by chapter 1 of the Code, so now we need to know what “gross income” is. So we turn to section 61 of the Code, 26 U.S.C. § 61, which provides the critical definition:

26 U.S.C. § 61

[G]ross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items:
(1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items;

(2) Gross income derived from business;
(3) Gains derived from dealings in property;
(4) Interest;
(5) Rents;
(6) Royalties;
(7) Dividends;

. . .

There are 15 items in the full list (I’ve only quoted the first seven), but the key part of the definition is that gross income means “all income from whatever source derived.”

So, between sections 1, 61, and 63, we see that the tax code passed by Congress imposes a tax on your taxable income, which includes all your income, from whatever source derived, less the deductions allowed by the tax laws. So the tax laws do impose a tax on you.


Now, how do you know that you have to file a tax return and actually pay the tax?
§ 6012 and § 6151

 

 

Section 6151 of the code, 26 U.S.C. § 6151, says:
26 U.S.C. § 6151

[W]hen a return of tax is required under this title or regulations, the person required to make such return shall, without assessment or notice and demand from the Secretary, pay such tax to the internal revenue officer with whom the return is filed, and shall pay such tax at the time and place fixed for filing the return (determined without regard to any extension of time for filing the return).

So according to this section, if you are required to file a tax return, you are required to pay the tax owed, to pay it at the time you file your return, and to pay it to the internal revenue officer with whom you file the return.

But who says you’re required to file the return? Turn back to section 6012(a) of the code, 26 U.S.C. § 6012(a), which provides:

26 U.S.C. § 6012(a)

Returns with respect to income taxes * * * shall be made by the following:
(1)(A) Every individual having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount * * *.

The “exemption amount” is defined in 26 U.S.C. § 151(d) as $2000, adjusted for inflation since 1989. You can see the exact amount for the current tax year in the IRS instructions to form 1040. If you have more income than this amount, section 6012 requires you to file a tax return (except that if you’re married, section 6013 gives you the option of filing a joint return with your spouse).

So there it is:

Sections 1, 61, and 63 impose the tax,
Section 6012 requires you to file a tax return if you have income of more than the exemption amount, and
Section 6151 requires you to pay the tax at the time and place fixed for the filing of your return.

§ 6072

 

 

And when is your return due? Section 6072 provides the answer: “[R]eturns made on the basis of the calendar year shall be filed on or before the 15th day of April following the close of the calendar year.” This is the statutory basis for the familiar April 15 tax deadline.

Of course, there’s a lot more to know if you want to achieve a full understanding of the tax system. For example, other statutes besides the ones quoted above create the extensive system of tax “withholding,” whereby you actually pay your taxes on your wages in advance, each time you receive a paycheck, so that on the day your return is due the government usually ends up owing you a refund. If you have substantial amounts of unearned income, there are also other statutes that require you to pay estimated taxes each quarter. And, needless to say, there are innumerable, complex statutes that more specifically define how much income tax you owe. But you only need to look at a few, relatively simple statutes to see that the duty to pay income tax is mandatory. You can look up the above statutes yourself in any law library (just ask the librarian to help you find Title 26 of the United States Code.) These statutes demonstrate that the claim that there is no law requiring average Americans to file income tax returns or pay income tax is complete nonsense.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Eric Stratton (#0) (Edited)

No doubt you got hung up at the assertion that IRS Code is Law. That is the faulty premise upon which that entire line of argument hinges.

There are two contrary arguments to that premise:

1. The IRS is not a Federal Agency and in fact, while it is assumed by most who have not studied the issue to be a part of the Department of the Treasury, is a Corporation registered in the Territory of Puerto Rico. That is a verifiable Fact. The IRS is not a government agency but a private collection agency incorporated by the Department of the Treasury. As such it has no Constitutional Authority to formulate or enforce any codes or rules which it creates.

1a. As a private corporation it has no legal authority to issue any document or "code" which is represented as and treated as law.

1b. As circumstantial evidence of 1a I submit for consideration the case of Mr Robert Lawrence who was charged with "Failure to File". His attorney Oscar Stilley (related info) submitted only one argument i.e., that the IRS 1040 form did not have a valid OMB number as required under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The problem that the IRS runs into is that in order to secure a valid OMB number they must be, and be able to prove, that they are a government agency seeking the number for a valid legal purpose. The government withdrew its failure to file case against Mr. Lawrence immediately, and with prejudice meaning that the case can never again be levied or filed.

1c. Nowhere in the Constitution is Congress granted the authority to delegate its law making responsibilities.

2. That the Sixteenth Amendment was never legally ratified under the Constitution which requires 3/4 of the States to approve. The statement made by Secretary of the Treasury Philander Knox when it was put into force was not that it was ratified but that it was in effect. So, again that removes any legal authority. There is a considerable body of evidence that suggests this to be the case that various states changed the wording and/or it was passed contrary to the State Constitution, but the Feds have been very careful to not levy any case which would allow this argument a hearing in court. This has the effect of rendering invalid and unenforceable any law predicated on the 16th Amendment.

All of that said they'll still send thugs with guns to enforce the non-laws and by virtue of setting up Tax Courts with limited authority to only hear cases pertaining to the interpretation of the code the average citizen is prevented from challenging the non-law upon its non-legality.

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-01-16   17:47:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Original_Intent, Eric Stratton (#1)

Very good, O_I. I agree with your post but assume arguendo as the shysters say, that the tax was legitimate. It gets into trouble right away by defining a term using the same effin word! Even a relatively intelligent eighth grader knows better. This is what I am referring to:

"[G]ross income means all income from whatever source derived..."

Income means income. Uh huh. But then it says, "from whatever source derived." Yes, from the source--it has to be severable from the source that created it and it has to be a PROFIT. The word "income" means "profit or gain," said terms being synonymous. One derives no "profit" when he exchanges one form of property for another in what is mutually agreed to be a wash or "equal exchange." For an example, Mr. Homeowner wants Mr. Rock Mason to do a little job for him, a patio say. They agree that Mr. Rock Mason will be paid 25 dollars an hour for his labor. Mr. Rock Mason believes his labor to be worth that and obviously so does Mr. Homeowner or he wouldn't agree to pay it. Therefore they have entered into a contract and are trading different forms of property but assumed by both to be an equal exchange. Thus no income and not taxable.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.    Lord Acton

The human herd stampedes on the fields of facts and the valleys of truth to get to the desert of ignorance. Saman Mohammadi

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would promise them missionaries for dinner." Mencken

"..if the military is going to defend our freedoms, then we need freedoms to defend. Our freedoms must be restored before the military can defend them..."  Lawrence M. Vance

Você me trata desse jeito só porque eu sou preto. Junior (my youngest son)

James Deffenbach  posted on  2012-01-16   18:35:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Eric Stratton (#0)

Everybody must file a tax return and render unto Caesar. The penalty for not doing so is facing a real tax court and a real prison sentence that FedGov will enforce with a vengeance. Now, if you can hide your wealth off-shore or in Switzerland, more power to you.

“With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group."
-Alex Kurtagic

X-15  posted on  2012-01-16   20:42:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Original_Intent (#1)

All of that said they'll still send thugs with guns to enforce the non-laws and by virtue of setting up Tax Courts with limited authority to only hear cases pertaining to the interpretation of the code the average citizen is prevented from challenging the non-law upon its non-legality.

Well said, and the key words are average citizen. IMO, THEY are cost effective. If the cost of the potential prosecution and imprisonment outweigh what the wealth they can confiscate, that person is good to go as far as not filing.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2012-01-16   21:09:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Eric Stratton (#0)

I think Aaron Russo's film Freedom to Fascism is the best and most accurate exposure of the IRS. Still, the bottom line is that the law doesn't matter. This is a fight that can't be won by anyone who has any property or assets. It's simply not worth the risk of losing everything.

christine  posted on  2012-01-16   21:18:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Jethro Tull (#4)

Thanks. And yes "average citizen" is the key. The "average citizen" does not have the resources to take on the criminal government and the penalties for not succeeding are so draconian and vindictive that it is cheaper to pay the illegal levy than to fight it. The deck is completely stacked against the average citizen. It is cheaper to pay the extortioner than to fight, and much more pleasant.

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-01-16   21:41:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]