[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

When Philadelphia’s Foul-Mouthed Cop-Turned-Mayor Invented White Identity Politics

Trump Wanted to Pardon Assange and Snowden. Blocked by RINOs.

What The Pentagon Is Planning Against Trump Will Make Your Blood Run Cold Once Revealed

How Trump won the Amish vote in Pennsylvania

FEC Filings Show Kamala Harris Team Blew Funds On Hollywood Stars, Private Jets

Israel’s Third Lebanon War is underway: What you need to know

LEAK: First Behind-The-Scenes Photos Of Kamala After Getting DESTROYED By Trump | Guzzling Wine!🍷

Scott Ritter Says: Netanyahu's PAINFUL Stumble Pushes Tel Aviv Into Its WORST NIGHTMARE

These Are Trump's X-Men | Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

Houthis (Yemen) Breached THAAD. Israel Given a Dud Defense!!

Yuma County Arizona Doubles Its Outstanding Votes Overnight They're Stealing the Race from Kari Lake

Trump to withdraw U.S. troops from northern Syria

Trump and RFK created websites for the people to voice their opinion on people the government is hiring

Woke Georgia DA Deborah Gonzalez pummeled in re-election bid after refusing Laken Riley murder case

Trump has a choice: Obliterate Palestine or end the war

Rod Blagojevich: Kamala’s Corruption, & the Real Cause of the Democrat Party’s Spiral Into Insanity

Israel's Defense Shattered by Hezbollah's New Iranian Super Missiles | Prof. Mohammad Marandi

Trump Wins Arizona in Clean Sweep of Swing States in US Election

TikTok Harlots Pledge in Droves: No More Pussy For MAGA Fascists!

Colonel Douglas Macgregor:: Honoring Veteran's Day

Low-Wage Nations?

Trump to pull US out of Paris climate agreement NYT

Pixar And Disney Animator Bolhem Bouchiba Sentenced To 25 Years In Prison

Six C-17s, C-130s deploy US military assets to Northeastern Syria

SNL cast members unveil new "hot jacked" Trump character in MAGA-friendly cold open

Here's Why These Geopolitical And Financial Chokepoints Need Your Attention...

Former Army Chief Moshe Ya'alon Calls for Civil Disobedience to Protest Netanyahu Government

The Deep State against Trump

A Post Mortem Autopsy: From A Diddy Party to a Pity Party

Whoopie Goldberg Blames Inflation on Grocery Store Owners, Calls Them Pigs


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: Need some help ...
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 16, 2012
Author: -
Post Date: 2012-01-16 17:08:55 by Eric Stratton
Keywords: None
Views: 219
Comments: 6

Buddy of mine sent me this, said he was talking to his dad about income tax and his dad sent him this taking the contrarian view. I haven't had time to look at it, but I immediately got hung up at the beginning when it said something that to me rendered the entire analysis flawed.

I thought I'd throw this piece of red meat out there and then come back and see what it looks like in a bit a little later and before reading the entire piece.

******************

Income Tax Myths

"There's just no law requiring you to pay federal income taxes."

The most basic myth of tax protestors is that there is simply no law mandating the payment of income taxes. Frequently one can observe anti-tax types to say something like, “if only someone would show me the law that says that I have to file a tax return and pay taxes, I’d be happy to do it.” I have a strong suspicion that people who say that are not serious, but I’m going to take them at their word. Here are the laws that (a) impose an income tax on you, (b) require you to file an income tax return, and (c) require you to pay taxes:

§ 1

 

 

The federal tax laws are contained in the Internal Revenue Code, also known as Title 26 of the United States Code, which is the compilation of laws passed by the Congress (“Title” basically means “Volume” when applied to the U.S. Code as a whole, so Title 26 is what might more casually be called Volume 26).

The Internal Revenue Code is the law that requires people to pay taxes (and yes, the Internal Revenue Code is the law -- for more detail on this point click here).

The most important statutory provision with regard to income taxes is section one of the tax code, 26 U.S.C. § 1. This is the section that actually imposes the income tax. It’s very simply written. If you are unmarried, the relevant provision is § 1(c), which states:

26 U.S.C. § 1
There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every individual . . . who is not a married individual a tax determined in accordance with the following table:

followed by a table specifying the tax rates on various income amounts. If you are married, you are covered by the similar provision at § 1(a). There are also a couple of other possible filing statuses covered elsewhere in § 1 (such as “head of household”), but the basic point is that section 1 imposes an income tax.
§ 61 and § 63

 

 

Section 1, it will be observed, imposes the tax on your “taxable income.” How do you know what that is? Section 63 of the Code, 26 U.S.C. § 63, defines “taxable income” to mean “gross income minus the deductions allowed” by chapter 1 of the Code, so now we need to know what “gross income” is. So we turn to section 61 of the Code, 26 U.S.C. § 61, which provides the critical definition:

26 U.S.C. § 61

[G]ross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items:
(1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items;

(2) Gross income derived from business;
(3) Gains derived from dealings in property;
(4) Interest;
(5) Rents;
(6) Royalties;
(7) Dividends;

. . .

There are 15 items in the full list (I’ve only quoted the first seven), but the key part of the definition is that gross income means “all income from whatever source derived.”

So, between sections 1, 61, and 63, we see that the tax code passed by Congress imposes a tax on your taxable income, which includes all your income, from whatever source derived, less the deductions allowed by the tax laws. So the tax laws do impose a tax on you.


Now, how do you know that you have to file a tax return and actually pay the tax?
§ 6012 and § 6151

 

 

Section 6151 of the code, 26 U.S.C. § 6151, says:
26 U.S.C. § 6151

[W]hen a return of tax is required under this title or regulations, the person required to make such return shall, without assessment or notice and demand from the Secretary, pay such tax to the internal revenue officer with whom the return is filed, and shall pay such tax at the time and place fixed for filing the return (determined without regard to any extension of time for filing the return).

So according to this section, if you are required to file a tax return, you are required to pay the tax owed, to pay it at the time you file your return, and to pay it to the internal revenue officer with whom you file the return.

But who says you’re required to file the return? Turn back to section 6012(a) of the code, 26 U.S.C. § 6012(a), which provides:

26 U.S.C. § 6012(a)

Returns with respect to income taxes * * * shall be made by the following:
(1)(A) Every individual having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount * * *.

The “exemption amount” is defined in 26 U.S.C. § 151(d) as $2000, adjusted for inflation since 1989. You can see the exact amount for the current tax year in the IRS instructions to form 1040. If you have more income than this amount, section 6012 requires you to file a tax return (except that if you’re married, section 6013 gives you the option of filing a joint return with your spouse).

So there it is:

Sections 1, 61, and 63 impose the tax,
Section 6012 requires you to file a tax return if you have income of more than the exemption amount, and
Section 6151 requires you to pay the tax at the time and place fixed for the filing of your return.

§ 6072

 

 

And when is your return due? Section 6072 provides the answer: “[R]eturns made on the basis of the calendar year shall be filed on or before the 15th day of April following the close of the calendar year.” This is the statutory basis for the familiar April 15 tax deadline.

Of course, there’s a lot more to know if you want to achieve a full understanding of the tax system. For example, other statutes besides the ones quoted above create the extensive system of tax “withholding,” whereby you actually pay your taxes on your wages in advance, each time you receive a paycheck, so that on the day your return is due the government usually ends up owing you a refund. If you have substantial amounts of unearned income, there are also other statutes that require you to pay estimated taxes each quarter. And, needless to say, there are innumerable, complex statutes that more specifically define how much income tax you owe. But you only need to look at a few, relatively simple statutes to see that the duty to pay income tax is mandatory. You can look up the above statutes yourself in any law library (just ask the librarian to help you find Title 26 of the United States Code.) These statutes demonstrate that the claim that there is no law requiring average Americans to file income tax returns or pay income tax is complete nonsense.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.

#1. To: Eric Stratton (#0) (Edited)

No doubt you got hung up at the assertion that IRS Code is Law. That is the faulty premise upon which that entire line of argument hinges.

There are two contrary arguments to that premise:

1. The IRS is not a Federal Agency and in fact, while it is assumed by most who have not studied the issue to be a part of the Department of the Treasury, is a Corporation registered in the Territory of Puerto Rico. That is a verifiable Fact. The IRS is not a government agency but a private collection agency incorporated by the Department of the Treasury. As such it has no Constitutional Authority to formulate or enforce any codes or rules which it creates.

1a. As a private corporation it has no legal authority to issue any document or "code" which is represented as and treated as law.

1b. As circumstantial evidence of 1a I submit for consideration the case of Mr Robert Lawrence who was charged with "Failure to File". His attorney Oscar Stilley (related info) submitted only one argument i.e., that the IRS 1040 form did not have a valid OMB number as required under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The problem that the IRS runs into is that in order to secure a valid OMB number they must be, and be able to prove, that they are a government agency seeking the number for a valid legal purpose. The government withdrew its failure to file case against Mr. Lawrence immediately, and with prejudice meaning that the case can never again be levied or filed.

1c. Nowhere in the Constitution is Congress granted the authority to delegate its law making responsibilities.

2. That the Sixteenth Amendment was never legally ratified under the Constitution which requires 3/4 of the States to approve. The statement made by Secretary of the Treasury Philander Knox when it was put into force was not that it was ratified but that it was in effect. So, again that removes any legal authority. There is a considerable body of evidence that suggests this to be the case that various states changed the wording and/or it was passed contrary to the State Constitution, but the Feds have been very careful to not levy any case which would allow this argument a hearing in court. This has the effect of rendering invalid and unenforceable any law predicated on the 16th Amendment.

All of that said they'll still send thugs with guns to enforce the non-laws and by virtue of setting up Tax Courts with limited authority to only hear cases pertaining to the interpretation of the code the average citizen is prevented from challenging the non-law upon its non-legality.

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-01-16   17:47:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 1.

#2. To: Original_Intent, Eric Stratton (#1)

Very good, O_I. I agree with your post but assume arguendo as the shysters say, that the tax was legitimate. It gets into trouble right away by defining a term using the same effin word! Even a relatively intelligent eighth grader knows better. This is what I am referring to:

"[G]ross income means all income from whatever source derived..."

Income means income. Uh huh. But then it says, "from whatever source derived." Yes, from the source--it has to be severable from the source that created it and it has to be a PROFIT. The word "income" means "profit or gain," said terms being synonymous. One derives no "profit" when he exchanges one form of property for another in what is mutually agreed to be a wash or "equal exchange." For an example, Mr. Homeowner wants Mr. Rock Mason to do a little job for him, a patio say. They agree that Mr. Rock Mason will be paid 25 dollars an hour for his labor. Mr. Rock Mason believes his labor to be worth that and obviously so does Mr. Homeowner or he wouldn't agree to pay it. Therefore they have entered into a contract and are trading different forms of property but assumed by both to be an equal exchange. Thus no income and not taxable.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2012-01-16 18:35:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Original_Intent (#1)

All of that said they'll still send thugs with guns to enforce the non-laws and by virtue of setting up Tax Courts with limited authority to only hear cases pertaining to the interpretation of the code the average citizen is prevented from challenging the non-law upon its non-legality.

Well said, and the key words are average citizen. IMO, THEY are cost effective. If the cost of the potential prosecution and imprisonment outweigh what the wealth they can confiscate, that person is good to go as far as not filing.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2012-01-16 21:09:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]