[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Ron Paul See other Ron Paul Articles Title: Slowly But Surely, The Republican Party Is Coming To Ron Paul MYRTLE BEACH, South Carolina—South Carolina State Sen. Tom Davis is your basic early state prize: A credentialed up-and-comer, former chief of staff to the governor, conservative to the bone. The setting for his endorsement Sunday, an unremarkable conference room in the cavernous Palisades Conference Center, was the familiar press conference stage. But this event was a little different from the others: Rather than bored reporters and blasé staffers, it was witnessed by a throng of young supporters, who cheered and stood on their edges of their chairs, clapping and chanting in support of their chosen candidate. And this was not a standard presidential candidate, but a sometimes-zany 76-year old Texan who has run twice before, but who is for the first time this cycle gaining a real foothold in the Republican Party. “We can’t just have good enough. We can’t have incremental steps. Incremental steps have grown our deficit to $2 trillion every year,” Davis told the packed conference center ballroom. His rejection of incrementalism applies not just to economic policy, but to his choice of candidate as well. “We need radical surgery, not aspirin,” he added in his introduction of Paul. Davis’ endorsement is the latest small step in a largely unremarked trend of mainstream Republicans backing the libertarian icon. With the backing of well-regarded local figures like Davis – Paul has picked up a steady trickle of state legislative endorsements from Idaho to Iowa to South Carolina -- to warm words from party icons like Sarah Palin, Paul has pulled off one of the trickiest moves in politics, crossing over from the fringe. And while Paul hasn’t come far enough to win his party’s nomination, this run will leave him the kind of legacy in the party that has allowed past also rans – Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole, John McCain – to return; in this case it could provides his son, Senator Rand Paul, the organization he’ll need to mount his own bid for the White House. The support of a new conservative counter-Establishment has also injected Paul's ideas -- from cutting foreign aid to going back to the gold standard -- into the Republican Party's bloodstream. Once beyond the pale, they're now part of the conversation. And while he may go away, and his son's political future may be uncertain, the ideas may be here as long as is the young, libertarian generation he brought to presidential politics. The credit for Paul's endurance lies, at least in part, with Mitt Romney. The frontrunner is barely an aspirin for a conservative base holding its head at the thought of another Obama term as evidenced by a long list of tea partiers and others who are still looking past Romney for a candidate. Former South Carolina GOP Chairman Katon Dawson told BuzzFeed Monday that even if they warm to Romney, that’s not enough. “That conservative base out there — they are the kerosene your pour in the fire to beat the liberals,” he said. “They like him. You’re going to have to have heat, passion. Republicans don’t just have to like a front-runner – they have to love him.” Many don’t. Radio and online television host Glenn Beck has said he’d only vote for Romney “If I had a gun to my head” — which is only half a step above his steadfast opposition to Newt Gingrich. “I might consider Ron Paul as a third party,” he said last month. Sarah Palin took the side of Romney’s attackers last week, calling on the former Massachusetts governor to prove his claim that he created 100,000 new jobs while at the helm of Bain Capital. “Gov. Romney has claimed to have created a 100,00 jobs at Bain, and people are wanting to know, is there proof of that claim and was it U.S. jobs created for United States citizens? … And that’s fair,” she said on Fox News last week. “That’s not negative campaigning — that’s fair to get a candidate to be held accountable to what’s being claimed.” She publicly defended Paul in November, calling on the media to give him airtime. Then earlier this month she argued that Paul is pro-Israel, saying "he just wants to go about that [protecting them] in a different way." South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint told conservative radio host Laura Ingraham last week that the attacks on Paul were harming the search for the anti-Romney candidate. “I think one of the things that have hurt the so-called conservative alternative is saying derogatory things about Ron Paul,” he said. “I don’t agree with him on everything, but he is right about the out-of-control and unaccountable Federal Reserve. He’s right about the need for limited constitutional government and the importance of individual liberty. Palin and DeMint are merely flirting with Paul; few contemplate that they would endorse him in what appears likely to be a long twilight delegate fight through the spring. Some conservatives also say the nod toward Paul is largely about keeping Romney from abandoning them entirely. “I don’t see any conservative or tea party effort to stop Romney emerging if he’s the nominee,” Greg Mueller, a former Pat Buchanan and Steve Forbes advisor, told BuzzFeed. “Will some conservatives endorse other candidates in South Carolina? Yeah, but we’re still in the primary.” And Romney’s best friend in his combat with Paul is, ultimately, the incumbent. “I think at the end of the day, the Obama fear factor really kicks in here. Conservatives think Obama is the most dangerous president in American history, and that is going to be a rallying mantra once the primaries and caucuses get finished.” Poster Comment: “I think one of the things that have hurt the so-called conservative alternative is saying derogatory things about Ron Paul,” he said. “I don’t agree with him on everything, but he is right about the out-of-control and unaccountable Federal Reserve. He’s right about the need for limited constitutional government and the importance of individual liberty. (and most important, foreign policy, dude) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 16.
#10. To: christine (#0)
A long, long time ago now.
Can anyone explain why R. Paul never left the GOP reservation? Like I said, I respect his ideas and the fact that he expresses them but I don't get his GOP membership. Should he have joined the Communists or the Masochists if those were the popular parties at the time? I'm asking because his explanation seems to be that he stayed aligned with the GOP for reasons of 'electability'. Which, besides being morally despicable, is also bullshit. He wasn't planning to run for re-election in 2012 and yet he stayed as a disciplined and well-behaved GOP candidate for prez, knowing full well that he didn't stand a chance. Yes, he was allowed to answer questions from a couple of fat establishments so-called reporters on the telly for a few minutes and got the coverage normally the mainstream media gives to the bearded lady at the circus but was that worth his soul? And I'm saying that his explanation is 'bullshit' because he refused to run as a non-GOP even when when it was crystal-clear that his chances of winning the GOP nomination were exactly ZERO and he knew that he wasn't going to run for congress again and, I believe, one or two 'minor' parties offered to have him as their candidate. Pat Buchanan separated himself from the GOP when he ran for prez (and then re kind-of rejoined them but that's another story) so why didn't Ron Paul.
If he had left the RP and ran on a third party ticket as you and others have suggested, his message wouldn't have gone as far as he did. His message would have been completely ignored. There would have been no anti-war or small government representation in the debates, and there would have been no talk of the Federal Reserve. While his presidential candidacy may have went no where, his ideas woke up a bunch of people and kindled a spark in others that may one day ignite. As for why he didn't run on a third party ticket after the primaries, it likely had to do with the sore loser laws most states have as well as the laws the two party fraud have created in most states that prevent just such a thing from happening. For example, in Michigan, Gary Johnson was three minutes late to withdraw from the 2012 Republican Primary and was therefore on the ballot. As a result, he was denied ballot access as a Libertarian in the general election. The same thing would have happened to Ron Paul. Every time Dr. Paul appeared on TV to answer "why are you in the race when you know you can't win" (which was frequently) he was able to get his message across - sometimes more effectively than others, but nonetheless he had exposure. What happened to Gary Johnson? He disappeared from the media like a fart in the wind.
There are no replies to Comment # 16. End Trace Mode for Comment # 16.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||