[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Elizabeth Warren has claimed, "Check my website. I don't take contributions from Big Pharma executives.

Walmart Is Preparing to Welcome Its Next Customer: The AI Shopping Agent

Mehdi Hasan debunks top 7 lies about Gaza

Why The Qataris Are Happy To Dump Their 747 On Trump

President Trumps New Diplomatic Agenda

White House Has Presented Iran With Written Nuke Deal Proposal In Huge First

I have NO words...

Elon Musk's tunneling robot

What's happening in Mexico is HORRIFYING and President Claudia Scheinbaum is in on it

RFK Jr TORCHES Big Pharma Libs In Congress "You Tried For 20 Years, I Did It In 100 Days"

Ed Martin Reveals J6 Pipe Bomber Probe Shakeup, Warns DOJ 'Much, Much Worse Than People Think'

"Rogue" Devices Found Hidden In Chinese Solar Panels Could "Destroy The Grid"

U.S. Deficit Hits $1.4 Trillion as China’s Surplus Climbs to $1.1 Trillion

Breakdown in classrooms Students using AI can’t read write or solve basic math

“Don’t you dare enforce the law!”

Can the Annual Theft of $521,000,000,000 From the Federal Budget Be Stopped?

Another conspiracy theory confirmed

This should infuriate every American

Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Nationwide Injunctions in Trump v. CASA

Older Employees Can’t Retire – FORCED to Work Minimum Wage

The Met Office is Unable to Name the Sites Providing Estimated Temperature Data For its 103 Non-Existent Stations

EPA Targets Engine Start-Stop Systems In Cars

Scientists find toxic metals linked to autism in popular toothpaste

FRAGMENTS OF HIV-AIDS VIRUS INSIDE COVID VACCINES.

Harvard Hammered: Feds Yank An Additional $450 Million In Grants

TOTAL WAR: TRUMP SHUTS DOWN THE IRS 45,000 AGENTS FIRED!

Netanyahu: Israel Will Finish War in Gaza, Drive Out 50% of Palestinians

Something has to change with Big Pharma... NOW.

Your Mitochondria Need THIS to Be Healthy. A Conversation with Nicolas Verhoeven, PhD

Ben Shapiro MELTS DOWN Over Trump Deprioritizing Israel


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Not sure if anyone noticed but...
Source: Me.
URL Source: http://NA
Published: Feb 1, 2012
Author: Me
Post Date: 2012-02-01 00:41:26 by TommyTheMadArtist
Keywords: Ron Paul, Mittens, Scrotor, Fruit King Bitch.
Views: 474
Comments: 23

So today I was watching the news.

Something curious about how each, and every single news station said the exact same thing about Mittens winning Florida.

Word for Word, sentence for sentence, the exact, same, thing.

I used to think it was just on the cable channels, but I watched 11 different news casts, and each, and every one of them said the exact same thing about how Romney needed to win big, by a landslide or whatever.

Then I noticed something else that was also quite curious. In the last 2 weeks or so, I have not seen ONE shot of the crowds where Santorum, Gingrich, or Romney are at. It's always a close in shot, with maybe a couple people behind them up to let's say a dozen.

Whenever I see a Ron Paul video, it's online, and in each one of those videos, I see hundreds if not a thousand people out there for him.

I've been watching Ron Paul go from nearly winning Iowa, to placing single digit 4th place in Florida. His last 3 showings were single digits, after Herman Cain, and John Huntsman bolted.

Yet another thing I found curious, is that Gingrich, and Santorum aren't even on the ballots in some of these states, and yet they're getting voted for, and getting delegates. How is this even possible, when Ron Paul is the ONLY other candidate besides Mitt Romney that's on all of the state ballots?

I'm asking these questions because I have many many friends in the real world who are voting for Ron Paul. In fact, nearly everyone I know is voting for him. I'm going to the caucus in my state, and plan to video all of what I see, because if I see ANYTHING like I've seen done in other states, done here, I will raise holy fucking hell.

I do not believe for one moment that Gingrich, and Santorum are getting the kind of votes needed to put Ron Paul in the single digits, and I certainly don't believe that so many morons would vote for a TRAITOR like Romney. What I believe is happening, is that Gingrich and Santorum will only keep going, if Ron Paul keeps going, because they're there to pull votes, or give the appearance of taking votes away from Ron Paul.

I have been thinking a lot about this for one reason. I do not think that our nation can survive or come back from totalitarianism, with Mitt Romney, or Obama as president for another 4 years. I believe we are in one of the darkest parts of our nation's history, making our civil war look like a pizza party at Chuck E Cheese.

Not sure how many other people feel the same as I do, but there simply cannot be any other explanation for what I've seen.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

#10. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#0)

Yet another thing I found curious, is that Gingrich, and Santorum aren't even on the ballots in some of these states, and yet they're getting voted for, and getting delegates. How is this even possible, when Ron Paul is the ONLY other candidate besides Mitt Romney that's on all of the state ballots?

Unless state law expressly forbids write in candidates, those not on the ballot can be written in. (Voting machines have a little sliding door under the printed names and you open it and write in the candidate of your choice, then close it. You wouldn't believe how many write in votes are discarded because people misspell a name and draw a line through it or, change their minds and write another name. Any such irregularities may result in votes not counted, especially since the election commissioners aren't monitoring the counts and those who decide which votes are "readable" can "wish those votes away". Years ago I received several votes for DE Attorney General or something after a few of my buddies and I agreed we'd all vote for each other as write ins because we despised the heavily favored DEMOCRATS who were running unopposed on the ballot. I could then honestly boast that "I came in second for AG!"-with 2 votes!)

The delegates are only obligated to vote for a "Rockefeller-Federal Reserve blow job" candidate on the first ballot, and if no candidate is the clear winner because the votes are divided roughly equal or are "too close to convince obstinate delegates" they are then "free" to vote for their "candidate of conscience" in subsequent balloting of the delegates. They then vote for the one they "project or divine" as being the favorite of the voters they claim to represent, even if it means that no single candidate garners all of the party delegates.

I don't know much but, confidence is high that every delegate agreed in advance that they'd vote for "anyone but Paul". The boyz in the backroom went to great lengths including breaking the law if necessary to make certain that no identified Ron Paul supporters are delegates.

And, because neither the parties, the election commissioners or the media will address the poisoning of (pissing in) the pool for Ron Paul, the party bosses get away with it in almost every state. But, do those who got shafted quit the party? Well, what do you think? I mean, they can't change parties because "Democrats are unprincipled and dishonest". And they won't join or vote third party because as the slimy, drooling, reptilian-octopus alien "Kang" on THE SIMPSONS said, "Go ahead, throw your vote away by voting for a third party! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!"

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2012-02-02   5:10:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: HOUNDDAWG, All (#10)

The Party! The Party! -- like a buncha loco Communist-Fascist-Nazis. There should only be one Party of relevance here -- a private Party of Constitution Loyalists. Whether they subdefine themselves as Left-leaning D's or Right- Leaning R's within the parameters of the Constition is not as important as remaining operationally within our Foundational framework. Overstep it and they should be dismissed from our government and elections for it.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-02-02   5:35:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: GreyLmist (#11)

The Party! The Party! -- like a buncha loco Communist-Fascist-Nazis. There should only be one Party of relevance here -- a private Party of Constitution Loyalists. Whether they subdefine themselves as Left-leaning D's or Right- Leaning R's within the parameters of the Constition is not as important as remaining operationally within our Foundational framework. Overstep it and they should be dismissed from our government and elections for it.

I agree.

But, historically, radio audiences of farmers and poor as catshit folks who listened to Father Coughlin (who was wise to The Heebs) and Charles Lindbergh (who pleaded desperately to keep us out of "The Second World War For Profit") would have never joined a party of bankers, industrialists and others praying for war. Numerical superiority meant nothing in the land of The Golden Rule, and poor folks knew it all too well. ("Uh, gee, I'd love to run against Percival Fauntelroy-Aldrich for party delegate but I'm 2,000 miles away from home building roads for the CCC!")

The same warmongers who paid goon squads to beat up people at anti war gatherings waited for Pearl Harbor just as they had waited for the sinking of The USS Maine in Havana harbor in 1898 and the sinking of The Lusitania in 1915. and their motives were certainly pure....profit from the sale of the steel in which they all owned stock.

There was no way that humble folks in the Heartland could take a sadistic delight in the deaths of 1177 men when the USS Arizona exploded and sank so quickly. But Roosevelt and his Wall St buddies were wheelchair dancing (no doubt to Hava Nagila) in celebration.

The bankers had no money to keep industries afloat during the "Great" (sic) Depression, (they had only enough to buy up industries for pennies on the dollar because their wives were frugal with the house money) but when it came time to finance a war against an evil country with the chutzpah to survive and prosper without Rothschild banks, and to profiteer from the sale of gunpowder, industrial diamonds (DeBeers was busted for ripping the govt off on prices for badly needed diamonds to manufacture lapping and grinding abrasives and sanding paper for the war effort) well, Hell, all the cash the govt could borrow was suddenly available!

And, even if the disenfranchised had no objection to an all inclusive political party, rich folks would not have approved of the company of those with hard earned dirt under their fingernails.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2012-02-02   6:42:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: HOUNDDAWG (#12)

Very informational post. I've said it before and I'm going to say it again that Roosevelt and Kamenev, of Soviet Triumvirate Infamy, had the variant name Rosenfeld in common. Communist-birds of a feather, imo.

Btw, is this critter from the Lost and Found at YouTube yours? I don't think it has your signature print above stamped on it but it has a Southern accent. It's not Summer so I didn't fix the peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. I was like, do I look like a restaurant or what? Anyhoo, here it is:

I Wish I Was A Teddy Bear

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-02-03   6:51:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: GreyLmist (#14) (Edited)

Regarding Roosevelt and Kamenev having the same name, I believe that is true. And FDR also said. "What's the matter with communists? Some of my best friends are communists." And, he certainly proved that.

I'm sure that had he lived he'd have considered it a bargain well made to enslave half of Europe for nearly half a century, and to dedicate most of America's productivity to a standoff with a former ally who suddenly became a commie threat that was mostly a bluff of crumbling rust held together with paint. If that's what it took to secure Rothschild's grip on the heart of Germany's economy, it was a bargain at twice the price. (What the Hell was Saddam thinking when he decided to unilaterally break the federal reserve's monopoly on the sale of oil? Right idea but ahead of its time.)

And, FDR's statement about commie pals may be the one sincere example when it wasn't "the mark of a bigot" as it always is when members of a certain hyper sensitive tribe are the "best friends" at issue.

And, that's a cute vid you posted, but it ain't me. I was hoping to get a response with my sig, and did I ever!

I was thinking of Barbara Fairchild's version. (there's some confusion on You Tube but this is her.)

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2012-02-03   17:09:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: HOUNDDAWG (#16)

FDR also said. "What's the matter with communists? Some of my best friends are communists."

please post the provenance of that quote.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2012-02-03   17:17:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 19.

        There are no replies to Comment # 19.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]