[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Ron Paul See other Ron Paul Articles Title: Anonymous Hacks Neo-Nazis, Finds Ron Paul
The hacktivist collective Anonymous set out to take down the white supremacist American Third Party (A3P) in what they called “Operation Blitzkrieg” but they may have done much more.
In a document dump that includes private forum messages, emails, organization notes another other information the group found numerous connections between Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul and A3P. According to the documents, all hosted here, Paul himself regularly met with many A3P members, engaged in conference calls with their board of directors and engaged in a “bridging tactic” between A3P and the Ron Paul Revolution.
Other excerpts show A3P webmaster Jamie Kelso (whose email account was one hacked by the collective) coordinating meeting between Paul and other members of A3P such as corporate lawyer and chairman of the neo-Nazi group Paul. “I’m going to go to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) with Bill Johnson,” reads an email to an A3P member dated January 2011. “Bill and I will be meeting with Ron and Ran Paul. I have a teleconference call with Bill (and Ron Paul) tonight. Much more later. Things are starting to happen (thanks to folks like you).”
In another passage, Kelso, a former Scientologist and account owner of other German Nazi forums, wrote: “I’ll be at CPAC from Feb. 9 to Feb. 12. I’ll send back reports to you from personal meetings with Ron Paul, newly-elected Senator Rand Paul and many others. It’ll be here on WhiteNewsNow, a place that is really starting to get interesting because of the presence of folks like you. Birds of a feather flock together, and we are really gathering some quality here.”
Accusations of racism and ties to neo-Nazi interests have plagued Paul since the 1990s and have re-surfaced during this campaign. So far Paul has issued standard denials, claiming not to have been aware of the ties between his camp and the racist right and denied authorship of a series of racist newsletters, despite confirmation from his closest staff that Paul signed off on every detail.
Like WeakeyLinks before it anonymous has specialized in hacking and releasing mainly inconsequential information i.e., a "limited hang-out" to establish their Bona Fides.
Their membership seems to contain a lot of people of very questionable character at the top of their "food chain".
What makes this release particularly interesting is the TIMING. Over and over again we can see that the release of data like this which damages a Bankster/NWO enemy is timed for maximum damage. This will tie RP and his campaign down combatting the false connections and I think this will nevertheless do irreparable damage. It is kind of like the old question, "Have you quit beating your wife yet?"
So, the timing alone makes it highly suspect. We are just about to enter a series of Primaries where it will be head to head Ron Paul and Mittens McRomney so how better to sabotage RP than using a couple of the deep cover assets to create a false image of RP as allied with Neo-Nazis? One could think of few other groups which would create more damage to his image - which is also why RP is smart enough to have no truck with them. So, just as RP is set to make major waves that the elites do not want we get a manufactured release of information, which were it true, is highly incriminating and speaks the exact opposite of his character that all other appearances have created. No, what this is, is a planned release to enable the (s)Elections to be tilted heavily towards the NeoCon Whore Mittens McRomney. Everything about it smells of heavy behind the scenes Intelligence Agency activity.
Were these connections valid the way his enemies have been digging for at least the last 4 or 5 years they would have long ago surfaced and the only thing that has come up are some marginal comments in some articles in his newsletter 20 years ago written by writer that now works at Forbes (which has connections to the CIA as does National Review).
With the example of such as Hal Turner, among others, we know that the so-called Neo-Nazi movement is mostly run as a False Front operation to create the illusion that there really are a lot of Nazis and thus justifying actions to "combat them".
So, what this really does, for me, is confirm that "Anonymous" is run by someone such as Tavistock/MI-6/CIA. Note the very few prosecutions of Anonymous members despite the alleged hacking they have done. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 28.
#2. To: Original_Intent (#0)
Spot on.
Spot on. Thanks. I have thought so for some time, and have said so before, but this would seem to be pretty solid confirmation.
If anonymous was an actual independent collective of vigilante hackers that was righting wrongs, it would get zero press coverage and be ignored. The publicity around anon gives it away.
The publicity around anon gives it away. I can't fault your reasoning - it is the same reason that I first pegged WeakeyLinks as a Trojan Horse. Given the level of control of the media, as we both know, nothing makes it on the Toob or into a major bird cage liner without approval on high. And anything that reveals anything of any significance about how the world is really run is ruthlessly suppressed.
I didn't trust weepyleaks because I never trusted Assange. I first ran across him in the early 90's when he was authoring software like "strobe". He was always a little too full of himself to be trustworthy. And anything that reveals anything of any significance about how the world is really run is ruthlessly suppressed. As the collective IQ of America has dropped to record lows, they don't have to suppress much anymore, do they?
As the collective IQ of America has dropped to record lows, they don't have to suppress much anymore, do they? Sadly, no. However, that is changing and that is part of why the Rothschilds/Tavistock et. al., have been accelerating their attempt to set up a hostile take over. However, as I predicted about 4 or 5 years ago when it became evident that, that is what they were doing that it might backfire by waking people up in larger numbers, and that has come to pass. I just don't know yet if the numbers are sufficient to thwart them and give them the "good hanging" they deserve.
There are no replies to Comment # 28. End Trace Mode for Comment # 28.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|