[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Ron Paul See other Ron Paul Articles Title: Four years after Ron Paul's "Trotsky Memo", vote fraud continues unchallenged Four years ago this week, in a messge to supporters dated February 8, 2008, Texas Congressman Ron Paul essentially threw in the towel of the presidential primary stating he was cutting down his campaign staff and focusing on retaining his Congressional seat. In the second sentence of his memo, which came to be referred to as The Trotsky Memo, Paul quoted Communist butcher Leon Trotsky, a choice which seemed wildly out of place to those familiar with the libertarian icon. Paul stated, in part, "And what achievements we have had. If I may quote Trotsky of all people, this Revolution is permanent. It will not end at the Republican convention. It will not end in November. It will not end until we have won the great battle on which we have embarked." He also insisted that he was remain part of the GOP: "Of course, I am committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican party, so there will be no third party run. I do not denigrate third parties -- just the opposite, and I have long worked to remove the ballot-access restrictions on them. But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican." Alternative media radio host Jeff Rense responded to Paul's memo the next day with an article titled Ron Paul's Goodbye. Rense lamented "Many Paulites will now walk away from this obviously, hopelessly corrupt and manipulated political charade in America...and will never look back. Some will stay. " Rense also noted "Sad to see him give it up...but it was totally predictable and comes as no surprise", and concluded that Paul was "a principled man" who "truly made a difference. And for that we owe him much." There was much contentious discussion about both the memo and Rense's commentary, a sampling of which is available here. Nearly four years later, Paul is again running for president, but shows no sign of backing off his campaign in February 2012. He has announced that he is retiring from his Congressional seat, regardless of the outcome of the presidential race. But is Paul, who has a stellar track record, in this race to win? Or is he doing it to continue to spread the message of liberty and educate the next generation? Paul has always held the long view of things. He patiently and consistently worked for freedom for many decades. While the fight for liberty is certainly a noble an valid cause, if he is in the presidential race he should do everything he can to genuinely win. This includes addressing the pesky issue of rampant vote fraud. The vote fraud in the Republican 2012 primary has been exhaustively documented by both mainstream and alternative outlets. Simply do a search on the words Ron Paul vote fraud and Ron Paul vote fraud blackboxvoting. Also see these links: Ron Paul's wife is reportedly a member of the "Velasco Order of the Eastern Star", a freemasonic group, and his daughters were allegedly "Rainbow girls", another masonic group. It has been debated whether or not Paul himself is therefore a mason. This would cast doubt on his trustworthiness for many who have researched the so-called "new world order". See: Jews frame Ron Paul as a "Freemason" - the guy has evidently truly converted to Christ The main thing that I hope is avoided is that people fighting for liberty do not put all their hopes into one man. Paul is a great candidate and statesman, but I'd hate to see all those good sincere people devastated, deflated and hopeless if their hero doesn't take the presidency and save the day. We all must fight to retain and regain our liberties individually, regardless who wins this zionist controlled dog-and-pony show referred to as the U.S. election. Advocates of liberty can support good candidates and even run for office ourselves, if one so desires, but ultimately one's faith and hope should be in Jesus Christ, not some politician. Martin Hill is a Catholic paleoconservative and civil rights advocate. His work has been featured on LewRockwell.com, WhatReallyHappened, Infowars, PrisonPlanet, National Motorists Association, WorldNetDaily, The Orange County Register, KNBC4 Los Angeles, Los Angeles Catholic Lay Mission Newspaper, KFI 640, The Press Enterprise, Antiwar.com, IamtheWitness.com, FreedomsPhoenix, Rense, BlackBoxVoting, and many others. His website is LibertyFight.com. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Artisan (#0)
(Edited)
You gotta lotta parts, Martin :) I alwyas said that RP would NEVER run as a third party candidate. And, he is right about the restrictions placed on third parties. In Illinois, you have to get the same number of signatures as the other candidates. Even if you run a write-in campaign, you have to do the same thing. ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
Another link re: the Las Vegas caucus...www.statesman.com/news/na...e=2&viewAsSinglePage=true
thanks for that link. thats incredible that adleson was allowed to hold a special jew caucus at night at his own school & count the votes. Paul won, so there must have somehow been honest vote counters. Unbelieveble.
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||