See other Religion Articles
Title: Madonna’s NFL Half Time Show - Satanic Ritual
Source:
Hollywood Illuminati
URL Source: http://hollywoodilluminati.com/2012 ... sguised-in-the-half-time-show/
Published: Feb 6, 2012
Author: Nicolas Duplessis
Post Date: 2012-02-08 08:52:04 by Bill D Berger
Keywords: None
Views: 10597
Comments: 418
Madonna’s NFL Satanic Ritual disguised as Church Music. by Nicolas Duplessis. 
(The Illuminati always has to do its rituals between the New Moon and Full Moon. The Full Moon is in 2 more days, so it is their time for rituals & what better place than a Half Time show with millions of people?)
(Madonna opened with a Roman Theme but she didnt have a Roman Helmet, instead she had a ritual Lucifer horned crown of gold!)
(Madonna used Satan horns for her opening act)
(The male dancers in Act 2 (Track: Music) made a quick pyramid and Madonna slithered through the pyramid like a snake. The pyramid in the photo is Satan’s Pyramid and an occult seal used to invoke Satan during rituals.)
(Light sticks are used in Illuminati Rituals, to worship Lucifer, and they are often held by the observers of the rituals, as a way of participating. )
(To worship Lucifer, one must wear mostly red and black. Madonna had on a black robe but the entire color scheme of the entire show was blk/red if you take into account her dancers starting in the second part of Act 2 with the cheer-leader rappers)
(Photo from Infowars.com)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 348.
#203. To: Bill D Berger (#0)
She's been a proud jezebel for as long as I can remember.
Actually I would not rate her quite that high. Depraved and Degenerate come to mind as ready adjectives. Also PsyOps. Her performance had to have been scripted with the delivery of specific messages to particular audiences depending upon a person's level of knowledge and awareness. Her book "Sex" gives some insight into her true level of dark depravity.
OI, not EVERYTHING you see is a "psyop". If anything, the elite would like to silence people who promote world peace, such as Madonna. You really have me scratching my head over this.
OI, not EVERYTHING you see is a "psyop". If anything, the elite would like to silence people who promote world peace, such as Madonna. You really have me scratching my head over this. No, not everything is PsyOps and I have never said it was. However, we are bathed in Psych manipulation to such a great extent that to some degree people have tended not to notice, or it blends in, because it IS present in a very large degree. Read the "Laurel Canyon" series sometime and look at some of the other outside research that has been done on how the popular culture is manipulated. I am not a "stick up my ass" Christian who is trying to enforce my personal view of morality on others, but that Christian morality, much of which is good and wholesome, is one of the things our power elite is busily trying to destroy because it runs counter to their plans for social manipulation and the normalization of perversity - such as has already been done with homosexuality. When I say that the PsyOps manipulation of our culture is pervasive I am not kidding. Once you are sensitized to it and start looking and analyzing a lot of it, not all, starts popping right out at you. The ghost of Sigmund Fraud and his ill begotten nephew Edward Bernays must be suffering gales of laughter about now. This imposition has not grown up overnight but it has been increased tremendously through the control of the popular media. Compare and contrast 1950's and early 1960's television with the manipulative schlock that is on the air now. I could spend a couple hours just analyzing and documenting the different types of manipulation, citing specific examples, were I inclined to take the time. I just find it a more profitable use of my time to exhort people to think for themselves - learn basic logic, and research, read, and research some more. One of my favorite examples is the less than amazing Randi and the so-called "Skeptics". While some of them are just suckers parroting the lines they've been fed at its core are series of potent memes: That is before we get into the specifics of what they say on any given topic and why. (Hint a lot of it comes out of places such as Langely Virginia and Tavistock, and no I can't prove it with a smoking gun, but that is my studied opinion after years of looking at it and analyzing it. The different threads from a multitude of different sources makes proving it an arduous task - which also requires stripping away a lot of false data from the minds of the audience.) As for "World Peace" the NWO is promoting "World Peace" from their perverted point of view. Of course if that means enslaving 99% of the population after killing off 85% of the population - well hey, "you can't make an omelet without breaking eggs".
It is like they are mocking us with the "world peace" message at the end knowing that they are about to start the most deadliest war the world has ever known.
WTF, how can you people see something sinister in a Superbowl performance which ends with the words "World Peace" spelled out in lights? Would you rather they have said "Let's nuke Iran"? Paranoia is a sickness you know.
Just to be a pain, contrarian that I sometimes am, the word "allegory" comes to mind. In a play rife with symbology and the overtones implied, or suggested, by the symbology the word "lights" stands out to my gimlet eye. Who is called the "Lord of Light" or "The Shining One"?
Who is called the "Lord of Light" or "The Shining One"? So what did you want them to do, spray paint the football field with black lettering and shine lights on it? Oh right, lights are bad. OMG OI, you have lost it.
Context is everything. I expected the response so I almost didn't float the thought and the association. However, you did not deny the allegorical representation as it does fit. It may not be correct but it does fit. Data insufficient to say if that was the intent. However, given the entire occultic context of her performance the comparison is almost inescapable.
Oh and as far as your claim that you see the word "Lights" somewhere in the stadium, can you point out exactly where you see this? Perhaps you're hallucinating OI, as I don't see it anywhere.
I did not make that assertion. You've misread my commentary somewhere.
Let me refresh your memory a bit. You posted this back in Post 234; Who is called the "Lord of Light" or "The Shining One"? Were you "speaking in tongues" perhaps, and forgot what you said in that altered state?
Let me refresh your memory a bit. You posted this back in Post 234; Who is called the "Lord of Light" or "The Shining One"? Were you "speaking in tongues" perhaps, and forgot what you said in that altered state? Actually 234 was your post and what you list here was my response to your 234 which is post 235. So, your 234 says in part (in response to RickyJ): Ricky: It is like they are mocking us with the "world peace" message at the end knowing that they are about to start the most deadliest war the world has ever known. FL: WTF, how can you people see something sinister in a Superbowl performance which ends with the words "World Peace" spelled out in lights? (emphasis mine) And in context my use of the word "lights" in 235 is in direct response to your use of the word in 234 i.e., the lights at the end of her number.
My bad, yeah it was post 235 I was talking about. So to get to the point, you now find the word lights to be a satanic word, right? WTF have you been smoking or sniffing these past few days OI? Whether it was flashlights or candles, who gives a shit, and if you think that the word lights has some sort of negative connotation, you've lost it.
I did not say it was a definite conclusion - it was just an association I floated as a follow on as suggested by your post. "Da Debil made me do it." However, if one presumes a Satanic/Occultic motivation underlying the "performance" it does fit. However, I am not a mind reader (except occasional flashes) and cannot say with any certainty that was part of the symbolism inherent in an obviously occultic themed "performance". Nothing more, or less. Just another datum to place in the Matrix and see how well it fits.
You dug yourself into a pit so deep, you can't get out. Oh, you tried, when you wrote "I did not say it was a definite conclusion - it was just an association I floated as a follow on as suggested by your post. "Da Debil made me do it." and this little gem: However, I am not a mind reader (except occasional flashes) and cannot say with any certainty that was part of the symbolism inherent in an obviously occultic themed "performance". Nothing more, or less. Just another datum to place in the Matrix and see how well it fits. Who do you think you are going to fool by saying things this stupid? If you are trying to dig yourself out of this, you failed miserably. You have to be a kike. You will do absolutely anything to avoid having to say "I was wrong".
So when are you going to lay down your expert observations and opinion concerning Shania Twain and her satanic performance at the Superbowl? You did admit that you thought she WAS in fact performing some sort of satanic ceremony, didn't you... Honesty, I could give two shits about Madonna, I just hate to see a person publically smeared and crucified for something that is so out of touch with reality. It's sickening to behold, and demonstrates how and why this country is so fucked up. What is especially disturbing is the fact that those doing the accusing think of themselves as spiritually superior and "holy", yet they are closer to being satanic than any "witch", where most "witches" are Wiccan whose creed is "Do no harm". Oh right, Madonna studies the Kabbalah, so she must be "worshipping Lucifer". It's a path to God you fucking moron. In the past, people such as you would have been using similar linguistic and theological gymnastics to justify the witch hunts and Inquistions, because it was the popular thing to do and a way to get the "right" people to like you and admire you. Myself, I could give a shit if I'm popular here or not. .
That's fine. You are welcome to your opinion and to give voice to it. I guess this is one where we will have to agree, amicably I hope, that we disagree on the point. To myself, and a lot of other observers who are not unintelligent, the performance definitely had the overtones and appearances of an occult ritual. I am willing, only, to go so far as to grant that it may simply have been theatrics, but those theatrics were born of her study of and dabbling in the occult, and that she has done so is a matter of public record. While I have read a little on the subject in no way would I put myself forth as an expert on the Kaballah. However, it is Jewish Mysticism and like some other mystic orders it has its hidden elements. Whatever Madonna was dramatizing is something with which she is familiar and it was presented as a carefully choreographed allegory which was filled with occult symbolism. Was it just for drama? Or was there a deeper meaning? I'm inclined to "B" but I am far from being able to prove it, but that is my sense of it for a lot of reasons I don't care to take a lot of time outlining.
That's fine. You are welcome to your opinion and to give voice to it. I guess this is one where we will have to agree, amicably I hope, that we disagree on the point. To myself, and a lot of other observers who are not unintelligent, the performance definitely had the overtones and appearances of an occult ritual. I am willing, only, to go so far as to grant that it may simply have been theatrics, but those theatrics were born of her study of and dabbling in the occult, and that she has done so is a matter of public record. While I have read a little on the subject in no way would I put myself forth as an expert on the Kaballah. However, it is Jewish Mysticism and like some other mystic orders it has its hidden elements. Whatever Madonna was dramatizing is something with which she is familiar and it was presented as a carefully choreographed allegory which was filled with occult symbolism. Was it just for drama? Or was there a deeper meaning? I'm inclined to "B" but I am far from being able to prove it, but that is my sense of it for a lot of reasons I don't care to take a lot of time outlining.01 Great post and response O_I.
I'm sure kissing OI's ass will make you popular with some people.
I'm sure kissing OI's ass will make you popular with some people. Are you ok? Have you had a physical check up lately?
You remind me a bit of palo verde who would grace the pages of LP with her favorite line, "great post", most of time in response to the ones which were praising GW Bush or some other neocon tripe.
You remind me a bit of palo verde who would grace the pages of LP with her favorite line, "great post", most of time in response to the ones which were praising GW Bush or some other neocon tripe. Wow. Are you comparing Original_Intent to GW Bush? IMO I don't see the similarities.
Did Dubya post on LP? I said palo would praise those who posted posts favorable of Bush. Go back and read what I wrote, not what you imagined I wrote.
Did Dubya post on LP? I said palo would praise those who posted posts favorable of Bush. Go back and read what I wrote, not what you imagined I wrote. Advice you could stand to take yourself vis a vis #234 & #235 since you construed and twisted my comment into unrecognizable form and then attacked the distorted representation.
You commented that you saw the word "Lights" as a tribute to Lucifer. It wasn't clear WHERE you saw that word, and in the end, you said that it was in MY post that you saw it. So basically you are claiming that I was "giving tribute" to Lucifer because I used the fucking word "lights". You are one sick puppy OI.
#354. To: FormerLurker (#348)
It wasn't clear WHERE you saw that word, and in the end, you said that it was in MY post that you saw it. So basically you are claiming that I was "giving tribute" to Lucifer because I used the fucking word "lights". You are one sick puppy OI. No, that is your misinterpretation. Read the posts again. You commented about the lights used to spell out world peace and the context flowing from the earlier comments was that the NWO crowd likes to use hidden references and pervert good into evil. I simply commented, a speculation, that the lights were evocative of a couple of the names of Lucifer - specifically "The Lord of Light". The rest is your unwarranted and unsupported speculation as to what you think I was thinking. I did not state it as a firm conclusion although I was aware that it could be misinterpreted - which you obligingly did. In other words you were making an unwarranted assumption from which you then launched an attack. If you are going to attack someone at least get your facts straight.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#205. To: Cornhuskerkid, Bill D Berger, CadetD (#203)
She's been a proud jezebel for as long as I can remember.
#209. To: Original_Intent (#205)
Also PsyOps. Her performance had to have been scripted with the delivery of specific messages to particular audiences depending upon a person's level of knowledge and awareness.
#211. To: FormerLurker (#209)
Also PsyOps. Her performance had to have been scripted with the delivery of specific messages to particular audiences depending upon a person's level of knowledge and awareness.
Rely on authority - if it didn't come from an "approved" source it can't be true.
Anything which diverges from the mainstream is false.
Materialism is the only valid philosophy and viewpoint.
There is no spiritual dimension to life. We are just animate sacks of chemicals who only think we can think because that is what the chemicals tell us. There is no life beyond the existence of the material, the body, and the belief that you are a spiritual being is illogical because we can't measure it with one of our holy oscilloscopes. Never mind all of the empirical observational data that suggests very strongly that man is not just meat. (This is basically the "humanist/atheist" viewpoint stripped of all of its sophistry.)
All Religion is bunk, because mainstream science can't verify it (of course mainstream science is all about materialism which rejects the spiritual a priori. So it becomes a circular logic of "Catch 22").
#232. To: Original_Intent (#211)
As for "World Peace" the NWO is promoting "World Peace" from their perverted point of view. Of course if that means enslaving 99% of the population after killing off 85% of the population - well hey, "you can't make an omelet without breaking eggs".
#234. To: RickyJ, Original_Intent (#232)
It is like they are mocking us with the "world peace" message at the end knowing that they are about to start the most deadliest war the world has ever known.
#235. To: FormerLurker, RickyJ (#234)
WTF, how can you people see something sinister in a Superbowl performance which ends with the words "World Peace" spelled out in lights?
#236. To: Original_Intent (#235)
In a play rife with symbology and the overtones implied, or suggested, by the symbology the word "lights" stands out to my gimlet eye.
#237. To: FormerLurker (#236)
#240. To: Original_Intent (#237)
#245. To: FormerLurker (#240)
Oh and as far as your claim that you see the word "Lights" somewhere in the stadium
#248. To: Original_Intent (#245)
I did not make that assertion. You've misread my commentary somewhere.
In a play rife with symbology and the overtones implied, or suggested, by the symbology the word "lights" stands out to my gimlet eye.
#267. To: FormerLurker, RickyJ (#248)
I did not make that assertion. You've misread my commentary somewhere.
(My comment: This was actually Post 235 which was in response to Post 234) In a play rife with symbology and the overtones implied, or suggested, by the symbology the word "lights" stands out to my gimlet eye.
#270. To: Original_Intent (#267)
And in context my use of the word "lights" in 235 is in direct response to your use of the word in 234 i.e., the lights at the end of her number.
#276. To: FormerLurker, TwentyTwelve (#270)
So to get to the point, you now find the word lights to be a satanic word, right?
#285. To: Original_Intent (#276)
(Edited)
#286. To: PSUSA2 (#285)
Charmin Basic Bath Tissue Only $0.15 a Roll at Staples!
#300. To: Original_Intent, ALL (#286)
(Edited)
#308. To: FormerLurker (#300)
Honesty, I could give two shits about Madonna, I just hate to see a person publically smeared and crucified for something that is so out of touch with reality.
#313. To: Original_Intent, FormerLurker (#308)
Honesty, I could give two shits about Madonna, I just hate to see a person publically smeared and crucified for something that is so out of touch with reality.
#316. To: TwentyTwelve (#313)
Great post and response O_I.
#327. To: FormerLurker (#316)
Great post and response O_I.
#328. To: TwentyTwelve (#327)
Are you ok? Have you had a physical check up lately?
#333. To: FormerLurker, Original_Intent (#328)
Are you ok? Have you had a physical check up lately?
#335. To: TwentyTwelve (#333)
Wow. Are you comparing Original_Intent to GW Bush?
#344. To: FormerLurker (#335)
Wow. Are you comparing Original_Intent to GW Bush?
#348. To: Original_Intent (#344)
Advice you could stand to take yourself vis a vis #234 & #235 since you construed and twisted my comment into unrecognizable form and then attacked the distorted representation.
Replies to Comment # 348. You commented that you saw the word "Lights" as a tribute to Lucifer.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 348.