See other Health Articles
Title: Importance of exercise in the information age
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 17, 2012
Author: Ben Ong
Post Date: 2012-02-17 06:34:16 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 45
Comments: 1
My emphasis is on exercise as the third leg with diet and supplements in order to keep healthy. So now there is some new research out there that you should know about. I can tell you right now, you probably need to get your MET average up. MET is an acronym for "metabolic equivalent of task," which is a measurement of the amount of energy you use in one minute during a task. (It's a little more complicated than that, but you get the idea.) Right now, for instance, you're probably sitting at your computer — an activity that's equal to about 1 MET. If you get up and walk to another part of your office or home, that will bump your MET up to about 2. If you hit the deck and give me two dozen push-ups — now you're talking! That's going to move up your MET to 8 or more. Now, why do METs matter? Because if your average MET total is low, day after day, your risk of heart disease rises sharply. But let's say you exercise about a half an hour or more every day. That's excellent. But believe it or not, you could still have a MET problem. This really shocked me because I spend an hour and a half every day in the gym but I also spend about 10 hours in front of my computer screen every day. So hear this ... US researchers at the University of South Carolina (USC) did something very useful. They took an entirely new look at a study whose primary results had been used for decades to prove that raising MET average with regular exercise promotes good heart health. But the study also included a small amount of data about sedentary activities. And the significance of that data had never been explored before. It had been ignored. Nobody thought it was important. When the USC team compared time spent in sedentary activities along with time spent exercising and then matched those numbers with records of heart disease deaths, the results were surprising. Men who spent more than 23 hours each week sitting (either in their car on in front of a television) increased their risk of death due to heart disease by more than 60 per cent compared to men who sat for less than 11 hours each week. Wow, that's me. Eleven hours of combined car and television time per week? That's nothing! Back in 1982, when the original study was conducted, the average adult probably logged in 11 hours by Tuesday. And they didn't even have cable TV or the Internet! So you might be concerned me when you add up your own average number of hours sitting per week. Is it high? If not, well done — you're a genuinely active person and that activity will help you live a long healthy life. For the rest of us — and yes, I include myself (up to recently e- mails were not written with me standing or running on a treadmill) — the prognosis is sobering. Because research shows that even if you get regular daily exercise, that won't offset most of the effect of being seated and relatively inactive for several hours every day. Well, I have a desk that is adjustable so that I can work standing. Guess what, this e-mail has been written with me standing up and I have been on my feet for six hours now. Believe it or not, you get used to it. Don't get me wrong — daily exercise does you a world of good. But to be genuinely healthy, you have to reduce couch time, then keep moving to get your average MET levels up. So do some light exercises while watching TV. Get in the habit of walking or biking instead of driving when possible. If you work long hours in front of a computer screen, take frequent breaks to stretch and walk around a bit. It's a simple equation: moving = longevity. https://www.bensprostate.com/total-health/ Ben Ong Please visit my website for more information
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
People who don't have a plan to stay active after they retire tend to die earlier than expected. It's a simple equation: moving = longevity.
-Alex Kurtagic
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest