See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Mysticism Claims More Victims
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.theobjectivestandard.com ... g/index.php/author/aarmstrong/
Published: Feb 19, 2012
Author: Ari Armstrong
Post Date: 2012-02-19 18:22:09 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 260
Comments: 7
CNN reports two recent atrocities: In central Nepal, a “40-year-old mother of two was burned alive . . . after she was accused of being a witch.” The woman “was attacked and set on fire by family members and others after a shaman allegedly accused her of casting a spell to make one of her relatives sick.” Meanwhile, Iran’s Supreme Court threatens a Canadian citizen with execution because the man “wrote a program to upload photos to the Internet.” That became a legal issue when a different party used the program “to upload pornography,” which, the court found, resulted in “insulting and desecrating Islam.” What enables such atrocities to happen in the 21st century, an era in which science and technology enable people to fly around the world, bounce television and communication signals off of satellites, and perform complex heart surgeries? How is it possible, in this day and age, that people still set family members on fire for being “witches”—and that governments still threaten to kill people over sex or nudity? What permits such utter terror, depravity, injustice, and barbarism? The answer is mysticism, which Ayn Rand described as “the acceptance of allegations without evidence or proof, either apart from or against the evidence of one’s senses and one’s reason.” Those who seriously believe that a shaman reveals secret knowledge, or that an ancient book prescribes the will of a “deity,” willfully turn their eyes and their minds from reality to embrace the unproved and unprovable, the arbitrary, and, consequently, the horrific. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#1. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
I wouldn't call it mysticism. The term implies spiritual understanding. The examples above are not those tied to spiritualists, it applies to those who lack spiritual understanding. I'd say they are religious fanatics, extremists, or fundamentalists, who take every word of their holy book literally, making no adjustment for translations or esoteric meanings. That, or they believe every word of their "religious leader".
Yep, and here's where we get into the "which version of the book(s)", and how were those specific books chosen.
#3. To: Jethro Tull (#2)
Not just that, but WHO wrote those books, and WHO chose which ones were "valid".
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThe answer is mysticism, which Ayn Rand described as “the acceptance of allegations without evidence or proof, either apart from or against the evidence of one’s senses and one’s reason.” Those who seriously believe that a shaman reveals secret knowledge, or that an ancient book prescribes the will of a “deity,” willfully turn their eyes and their minds from reality to embrace the unproved and unprovable, the arbitrary, and, consequently, the horrific.
#2. To: FormerLurker (#1)
who take every word of their holy book literally, making no adjustment for translations or esoteric meanings
Replies to Comment # 2. here's where we get into the "which version of the book(s)", and how were those specific books chosen.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.