[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

JD Vance ENDS CNN Dana Bash’s Career LIVE on Air Hell Let Loose - MOATS with George Galloway Important Message: Our Country Our Choice Israel is getting SLAUGHTERED in Lebanon, Americans are trapped | Redacted Warren Buffett has said: “I could end the deficit in five minutes. FBI seizes Diddy tape showing Hillary Clinton killing a child at a 'Freak Off' party Numbers of dairy cow deaths from bird flu increasing to alarming rates Elites Just Told Us How They'll SILENCE US! Reese Report: The 2024 October Surprise? Americans United in Crisis: Mules Carry Supplies to Neighbors Trapped by Hurricanes Devastation in NC NC STATE POLICE WILL START ARRESTING FEDS THAT ARE BLOCKING AIDE FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES France BANS ARMS SALES To Israel & Netanyahu LASHES OUT At Macron | Iran GETS READY CNN Drops Bomb on Tim Walz, Releases Blistering Segment Over Big Scandals in His Own State EU concerned it has no influence over Israel FT How Israels invasion of Lebanon poses risks to Turkiye Obama's New Home in Dubai?, Vaccine Skeptics Need To Be Silenced! Bill Gates Hillary Clinton: We Lose Total Control If Social Media Companies Dont Moderate Content Cancer Patients Report Miraculous Recoveries from Ivermectin Treatment Hurricane Aid Stolen By The State Of Tennessee? The Pentagon requests $1.2bn to continue Red Sea mission US security officials warn of potential threats within two weeks, ramped-up patrols. Massive Flooding Coming From Hurricane Milton How the UK is becoming a ‘third-world’ economy What Would World War III Really Look Like? It's Already Starting... The Roots Of The UK Implosion And Why War Is Inevitable How The Jew Thinks “In five years, scientists predict we will have the first ice-free Arctic summer" John Kerry in 2009 Jewish FEMA disaster relief handbook actually mandates prioritising non-Whites for disaster relief A Comprehensive Guide To Choosing The Right Protein Powde

(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: 'Ineligible' Rubio top GOP choice for VP Will Republicans put possibly unqualified candidate on ballot?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/ineligible-rubio-top-gop-choice-for-vp/
Published: Feb 21, 2012
Author: Joe Kovacs
Post Date: 2012-02-21 12:24:30 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 406
Comments: 34

JUPITER ISLAND, Fla. – Despite his avowed non-interest and the fact he may not even be constitutionally eligible to hold the office, Florida U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio is the top choice of Republicans and independents for the vice-presidential slot on the Republican ticket this year, according to a brand-new poll.

The national survey of 800 registered voters by Fairleigh Dickinson University’s PublicMind shows Rubio receiving 66 mentions, more than 8 percent of the time, followed by former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

“Anytime you place ahead of Sarah Palin, call yourself a winner,” said poll director Peter Woolley, “Her name recognition and presence are formidable.”

Learn the difference between a regular citizen and a “natural-born citizen.” Get Jerome Corsi’s “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?”

The question given to respondents was open-ended, asking: “No matter who is the Republican nominee for president, if you could pick the vice presidential nominee, who would it be?”

After Palin, the top respondents were Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, Michele Bachmann and surprisingly, Democrat Hillary Clinton.

While Rubio himself has expressed numerous times that he is not interested in running for vice president, the public’s interest in him has not waned.

But his presence on the ticket could cause a backlash among some voters who believe he is not a natural-born citizen of the United States, and thus ineligible for president or vice president.

Though Rubio was born in Miami, Fla., in 1971, his parents were not U.S. citizens at the time, and they did not become American citizens until Nov. 5, 1975, four years after Marco was born.

Many say that a natural-born citizen must be someone born to parents who are both already U.S. citizens.

“Rubio’s not eligible,” WND Editor Joseph Farah told Sean Hannity during an appearance on the Fox News Channel last month.

“You’re going to lose 10 percent of the Republican vote because he’s not a natural-born citizen. We’ve been through this with Obama now for four years. You want to open that can of worms again?”

Poster Comment:

"This country has gotten ludicrous....I at least want our slime-ball, ass-hole tyrants to be Americans." <---My husband.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

#1. To: christine (#0) (Edited)

Rubio was born inside the US, both parents were legally admitted to this country, so he's a natural-born citizen, notwithstanding that neither parent was a US citizen at the time. He meets the basic constitutional criteria for a Presidential candidate. The people who say otherwise are simply wrong.

Shoonra  posted on  2012-02-21   12:27:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

by the power of numbskull you are she-ra!

IRTorqued  posted on  2012-02-21   22:42:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I'll wait until one of you birthers knows as much about the Constitution as the Chief Justice.

Shoonra  posted on  2012-02-22   7:53:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You at #9: I've gotten bored with citing the 21st President, Chester A. Arthur (a Republican), as a precedent. So I'll cite Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, who was born in NY to two British subjects, yet ran for and was nominated by the Republicans for President in 1916 (lost to Woodrow Wilson). I figure if a Chief Justice says that two foreign parents is not disqualifying, who am I to argue.

You again at #11 here: I'll wait until one of you birthers knows as much about the Constitution as the Chief Justice.

Arthur wasn't a "precedent" and he wasn't a valid President. Even valid Presidents don't have the power to nullify the Constitution, silly, much less invalid ones like him by mistake. What kind of persons, though, want to alter and manipulate our government by error? Persons with no allegiance to our Constitution or our Republic. I tend to think that's the case with you, rather than mere confusion due to a word-slurring speech impediment among your group: birther as "birfer", precedent as "President". Now you've no arguable excuse anymore to not distinguish the difference unless you want to plead Dyslexia or something.

But let's talk about "Chief Justice" Hughes, born of two British subjects, who similarly tried to pull the same Arthurian stunt in contempt of our Constititon's POTUS requirements in his own sleazy attempt to run illegitimately for that office. Undoubtedly, Hughes had some agenda bias on issues of natural born citizenship status or not but you can be sure that he knew he wasn't eligible on those grounds. The matter was brought to public attention by Atty. Long who was former Secreatary of State and Ambassador to Italy.

So, which Hughes case are you refering to? As for Wong Kim Ark, which didn't redefine natural born citizenship status as you've persistently misinterpreted, you might as well stop citing that case at all because one of the presiding Justices, Gray, was appointed by...Arthur who was not qualified to make that appointment as a valid President. His own SCOTUS position being subject to nullification on those grounds, he undoubtedly had some agenda bias to cover for his benefactor, Arthur, by obfuscating issues of natural born citizenship status or not. Capiche?

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-02-22   20:15:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't believe I ever confused President with precedent.

Your reference to Breckenridge Long is sort of amusing. Long was in private legal practice in St. Louis, Mo., until AFTER he published an essay doubting Charles Evans Hughes's eligibility for the Presidency, which, incidentally, was not published until AFTER the 1916 election was well over. His essay appeared in the Chicago Legal News on December 7, 1916 (pages 146-148), a full month after Election Day - by which time it was such a cold issue that nobody seemed to care enough to write up a rebuttal. And it wasn't until after that that Long got a job in the Wilson Administration ... as Third Assistant Secretary of State, until he quit three years to run (and lose) for the US Senate. His real accomplishments came more than a dozen years later when he was in FDR's Administration.

Nobody else seemed to doubt that Hughes was eligible for President, and considering that he was a candidate in both 1912 and 1916 (being the GOP nominee in 1916) that is very significant. And, despite all your rejection of Chester A. Arthur, it turns out that his Presidency, his executive actions, his signing of laws, etc., were NEVER doubted by either Congress or the Courts.

Obama's eligibility has been challenged in dozens of court cases, sometimes with real lawyers bringing the suits, and the challengers have always lost. In the case of Ankeny v. Governor (Indiana App., Nov. 12, 2009) 916 N.E.2d 676, the court explicitly held that Obama was a "natural born citizen".

Shoonra  posted on  2012-02-23   8:25:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#19. To: Shoonra (#18)

Obama's eligibility has been challenged in dozens of court cases, sometimes with real lawyers bringing the suits, and the challengers have always lost. In the case of Ankeny v. Governor (Indiana App., Nov. 12, 2009) 916 N.E.2d 676, the court explicitly held that Obama was a "natural born citizen".

And of course if some shyster who has been elevated to the High Cult of the Black Robe ("the court") says so then that must be true, right? Just like the dumb asses you cited in Congress who allegedly passed some bill or something proclaiming your Kenyan to be something other than a Kenyan made it true. If Congress or some judge says something then it is up to the serfs and peons to just accept it as if the hand of God himself wrote it on stone tablets, right?

James Deffenbach  posted on  2012-02-23 08:53:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The point is that both SCOTUS "Justices", Hughes and Gray, are compromised on the issue of natural born citizenship due to their surrounding circumstances and probable motives to vindicate and validate themselves retroactively.

Your arguments about Atty. Long (a "real attorney", as you say - yes?) are spurious. The point there is that Hughes knew that he was ineligible to be POTUS and Gray was subject to removal from the bench at the time if Congress and the Courts did the right thing then and nullified Arthur's administrations. No rebuttal to Long's argument against Hughes doesn't mean that noboby cared about the Constitutional issue as one of serious importance. The default reading would be that there were no rebuttable counterpoints to be made. His political career and Senate bid doesn't make his arguments on the Article II matter more valid or less so. If the issue was as trivial or derisively "amusing" as you suggest, suffice it to say that it is remarkable he had a lengthy and accomplished political career (as you yourself noted). What forces were arrayed by press blockades to suppress his challenge of Huges as ineligible, by Courts to muddle the Constitution, and by election-rigging to keep him out of the Senate where he might have moved authoritatively to repeal Arthur's paperwork is questionable. And that brings us back to my question of:

What kind of people want to alter and manipulate our government by error, Shoonra?

Edited for capitalization and 2nd sentence of paragraph 2 for clarity.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-02-23 15:21:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]