[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: 'Ineligible' Rubio top GOP choice for VP Will Republicans put possibly unqualified candidate on ballot?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/ineligible-rubio-top-gop-choice-for-vp/
Published: Feb 21, 2012
Author: Joe Kovacs
Post Date: 2012-02-21 12:24:30 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 642
Comments: 34

JUPITER ISLAND, Fla. – Despite his avowed non-interest and the fact he may not even be constitutionally eligible to hold the office, Florida U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio is the top choice of Republicans and independents for the vice-presidential slot on the Republican ticket this year, according to a brand-new poll.

The national survey of 800 registered voters by Fairleigh Dickinson University’s PublicMind shows Rubio receiving 66 mentions, more than 8 percent of the time, followed by former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

“Anytime you place ahead of Sarah Palin, call yourself a winner,” said poll director Peter Woolley, “Her name recognition and presence are formidable.”

Learn the difference between a regular citizen and a “natural-born citizen.” Get Jerome Corsi’s “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?”

The question given to respondents was open-ended, asking: “No matter who is the Republican nominee for president, if you could pick the vice presidential nominee, who would it be?”

After Palin, the top respondents were Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, Michele Bachmann and surprisingly, Democrat Hillary Clinton.

While Rubio himself has expressed numerous times that he is not interested in running for vice president, the public’s interest in him has not waned.

But his presence on the ticket could cause a backlash among some voters who believe he is not a natural-born citizen of the United States, and thus ineligible for president or vice president.

Though Rubio was born in Miami, Fla., in 1971, his parents were not U.S. citizens at the time, and they did not become American citizens until Nov. 5, 1975, four years after Marco was born.

Many say that a natural-born citizen must be someone born to parents who are both already U.S. citizens.

“Rubio’s not eligible,” WND Editor Joseph Farah told Sean Hannity during an appearance on the Fox News Channel last month.

“You’re going to lose 10 percent of the Republican vote because he’s not a natural-born citizen. We’ve been through this with Obama now for four years. You want to open that can of worms again?”


Poster Comment:

"This country has gotten ludicrous....I at least want our slime-ball, ass-hole tyrants to be Americans." <---My husband.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

#1. To: christine (#0) (Edited)

Rubio was born inside the US, both parents were legally admitted to this country, so he's a natural-born citizen, notwithstanding that neither parent was a US citizen at the time. He meets the basic constitutional criteria for a Presidential candidate. The people who say otherwise are simply wrong.

Shoonra  posted on  2012-02-21   12:27:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Shoonra (#1)

by the power of numbskull you are she-ra!

IRTorqued  posted on  2012-02-21   22:42:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: IRTorqued (#11)

I'll wait until one of you birthers knows as much about the Constitution as the Chief Justice.

Shoonra  posted on  2012-02-22   7:53:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Shoonra, All (#12)

You at #9: I've gotten bored with citing the 21st President, Chester A. Arthur (a Republican), as a precedent. So I'll cite Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, who was born in NY to two British subjects, yet ran for and was nominated by the Republicans for President in 1916 (lost to Woodrow Wilson). I figure if a Chief Justice says that two foreign parents is not disqualifying, who am I to argue.

You again at #11 here: I'll wait until one of you birthers knows as much about the Constitution as the Chief Justice.

Arthur wasn't a "precedent" and he wasn't a valid President. Even valid Presidents don't have the power to nullify the Constitution, silly, much less invalid ones like him by mistake. What kind of persons, though, want to alter and manipulate our government by error? Persons with no allegiance to our Constitution or our Republic. I tend to think that's the case with you, rather than mere confusion due to a word-slurring speech impediment among your group: birther as "birfer", precedent as "President". Now you've no arguable excuse anymore to not distinguish the difference unless you want to plead Dyslexia or something.

But let's talk about "Chief Justice" Hughes, born of two British subjects, who similarly tried to pull the same Arthurian stunt in contempt of our Constititon's POTUS requirements in his own sleazy attempt to run illegitimately for that office. Undoubtedly, Hughes had some agenda bias on issues of natural born citizenship status or not but you can be sure that he knew he wasn't eligible on those grounds. The matter was brought to public attention by Atty. Long who was former Secreatary of State and Ambassador to Italy.

So, which Hughes case are you refering to? As for Wong Kim Ark, which didn't redefine natural born citizenship status as you've persistently misinterpreted, you might as well stop citing that case at all because one of the presiding Justices, Gray, was appointed by...Arthur who was not qualified to make that appointment as a valid President. His own SCOTUS position being subject to nullification on those grounds, he undoubtedly had some agenda bias to cover for his benefactor, Arthur, by obfuscating issues of natural born citizenship status or not. Capiche?

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-02-22   20:15:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: GreyLmist (#17)

I don't believe I ever confused President with precedent.

Your reference to Breckenridge Long is sort of amusing. Long was in private legal practice in St. Louis, Mo., until AFTER he published an essay doubting Charles Evans Hughes's eligibility for the Presidency, which, incidentally, was not published until AFTER the 1916 election was well over. His essay appeared in the Chicago Legal News on December 7, 1916 (pages 146-148), a full month after Election Day - by which time it was such a cold issue that nobody seemed to care enough to write up a rebuttal. And it wasn't until after that that Long got a job in the Wilson Administration ... as Third Assistant Secretary of State, until he quit three years to run (and lose) for the US Senate. His real accomplishments came more than a dozen years later when he was in FDR's Administration.

Nobody else seemed to doubt that Hughes was eligible for President, and considering that he was a candidate in both 1912 and 1916 (being the GOP nominee in 1916) that is very significant. And, despite all your rejection of Chester A. Arthur, it turns out that his Presidency, his executive actions, his signing of laws, etc., were NEVER doubted by either Congress or the Courts.

Obama's eligibility has been challenged in dozens of court cases, sometimes with real lawyers bringing the suits, and the challengers have always lost. In the case of Ankeny v. Governor (Indiana App., Nov. 12, 2009) 916 N.E.2d 676, the court explicitly held that Obama was a "natural born citizen".

Shoonra  posted on  2012-02-23   8:25:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Shoonra (#18)

Obama's eligibility has been challenged in dozens of court cases, sometimes with real lawyers bringing the suits, and the challengers have always lost. In the case of Ankeny v. Governor (Indiana App., Nov. 12, 2009) 916 N.E.2d 676, the court explicitly held that Obama was a "natural born citizen".

And of course if some shyster who has been elevated to the High Cult of the Black Robe ("the court") says so then that must be true, right? Just like the dumb asses you cited in Congress who allegedly passed some bill or something proclaiming your Kenyan to be something other than a Kenyan made it true. If Congress or some judge says something then it is up to the serfs and peons to just accept it as if the hand of God himself wrote it on stone tablets, right?

James Deffenbach  posted on  2012-02-23   8:53:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 19.

#21. To: James Deffenbach, Shoonra (#19)

JD to Shoonra: the dumb asses you cited in Congress who allegedly passed some bill or something proclaiming your Kenyan to be something other than a Kenyan

Could you point me to that post?

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-02-23 15:54:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: James Deffenbach (#19)

i'm amused. ;)

christine  posted on  2012-02-23 22:22:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]