See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Romney Paul Ticket? Would you hold your nose or do it gladly?
Source:
Here
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 23, 2012
Author: self
Post Date: 2012-02-23 03:43:54 by titorite
Keywords: None
Views: 548
Comments: 52
On the very off chance of a Romney Paul Ticket.... Would you do it? As I think about it...That would be I victory of sorts...... Although I wouldn't want to be Romney on that ticket...... I vote for it. Gladly... But thats me... Would you hold you nose or vote for paul in a vp position with pride?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-12) not displayed.
.
.
.
#13. To: titorite (#0)
Need lots of time to mull that prospect over. Doesn't smell good right out of the gate, BUT, Ron Paul would be the tie-breaker vote in the Senate. The prospect of the Senators having Ron Paul occasionally hanging around as President of the Senate, even in the limited role of that position, would cause great consternation amongst those scurrilous bastards.
-Alex Kurtagic
#14. To: randge (#7)
randge... With time this corrupt "government" will prove to be the Mother of all the known "ISMS". We need a new sobriquet for the regime we've come to live under.
#15. To: Cynicom (#14)
If you can hold your natural disgust in abeyance, it's almost entertaining watching the globalist dialectic sprout its various strange fruits. Every new "ism" is a snare for unwary minds.
#16. To: christine (#9)
Very good question, requires some thinking. Kennedys had the money, Johnson and his cronies had the power. It was a marriage made in Hell and we paid for it. JFK sold his soul for the presidency and Johnson reaped the harvest. Continue your thinking. We have to wonder what condition this country would now be in if Nixon had won???????? Leave love or hate and politics out of it, just perhaps we would have a much better country?????? Certainly we could not be worse off. do you think it was Kennedy's choice or was he told that LBJ was his choice?
#17. To: Cynicom, 4um (#16)
Nixon, puppet that he was, had the Tribe right (Google is a friend for those who haven't read his thoughts on these folk), so on that basis alone, Nixon would have been better than LBJ, IMO.
#18. To: Jethro Tull (#17)
Hope you are feeling better and sans a "stone" or two. If one wants to review what Nixon was, from a neutral viewpoint, they need to read "Witness" by W. Chambers. Chambers was the man that educated Nixon on the real government, the one that always remains unseen and in the background. Because of that "education", Nixon is heard on tape telling Haldemann that, "I will never appoint a Jew as head of the FBI"...... As result we had "deepthroat" who turned out to be a Jew in the FBI named Norman Felt, the man that brought Nixon down. Jew Felt wanted the job, AND HAD HE GOTTEN IT HE WOULD HAVE NEVER MENTIONED NIXONS BREAKINS. Nixon would have served his full term, no better, no worse than most presidents. Nixon, puppet that he was, had the Tribe right
#19. To: Cynicom (#18)
Just more history to tell us all how we got into this mess we find ourselves. The knowledge you share is greatly appreciated. Too bad the masses can't wade through the B.S. of the politicians and accept that history DOES repeat itself. They should be spending their time organizing a serious response to the work of the criminals in D.C., not listening to their hyperbole and thinking that voting for the "right candidate" will make a difference. The evildoers will make sure the winner is picked via their own dirty work ... not by the votes of the masses. As result we had "deepthroat" who turned out to be a Jew in the FBI named Norman Felt, the man that brought Nixon down.
#20. To: titorite (#0)
Yes, I would vote for it. Paul would get a lot of coverage, and that would be a good thing.
"You shall have fun, no matter what you do." -- Turtle
#21. To: Cynicom (#18)
Agree. I can't see Nixon doing LBJs the Great Society, but I wouldn't bet my last shekel on that. I'm going to a Guyana trained witch doctor in an hour to discuss my annual stone attack. Payment to be made with brightly painted shells and two medium sized chickens.
#22. To: titorite (#0)
I don't think I would vote the ticket, even though I am enthusiastic about Ron Paul. I think it would be damaging to Ron's message and movement without giving him the ability to actually get the important things done (or more appropriately, UNDONE). Romney Paul Ticket? Would you hold your nose or do it gladly?
Vote absentee. It is a paper ballot 
Democrats don't mind war as long as they can have big government. Republicans don't mind big government as long as they can have war.
If you believe in small government, then you shouldn't be in the White House.
'Wiped off the Map' – The Rumor of the Century
#23. To: christine (#9)
A Harvard graduate was told to put some inbred hillbilly cowboy with a degree from some four-rate teacher's college on the ticket? do you think it was Kennedy's choice or was he told that LBJ was his choice?
"You shall have fun, no matter what you do." -- Turtle
#24. To: christine (#10)
As would I... but sometimes politics make for strange bed fellows. And the two are cordial with one another more so than Paul was with Perry. It would be strange...but not totally impossible. i would be shocked if Paul agreed to this.
I support the occupation
Fuck it if it kills me. Liberty before death.
#25. To: titorite (#0)
Regardless of the smear articles being posted on big government, left wing Republican forums like LP and FR, I reject outright the idea that Dr. Paul would accept a VP position under Romney or any of the present candidates. So because Paul attacks Santorum during the debates he's in league with Romney? What nonsense. And look at who the authors of these hit pieces are and who is posting them. Paul haters. People with an anti-Paul agenda. Republicrat authoritarians who cannot stand the thought of losing control over other peoples lives, war mongers who make their living off of war, the Talibornagain who want to bring about their Armageddon, Jews who are afraid of losing that government tit and want us to fight their battles, the old and decrepit as well as the sick, lame, and lazy who believe the rest of us owe them something and are afraid that Dr. Paul will take away their government goodies, not to mention the lovers of Republican big government in general who just can't imagine a world in which the federal government isn't involved in their life in some way, shape, or form. Dr. Paul has stated on more than one occasion that his goal is not to win the presidency but to spread a message and build a movement. If he were to become a VP candidate to a status quo Republicrat he would be betraying that message and that movement. There is nothing in his history which would indicate that he would do such a thing. As an aside, I do find it entertaining to see the same people on LP and FR who claimed Palin was the new Reagan going apoplectic over these BS articles. They were the same ones telling us that it meant nothing that their "uber-conservative" heroine was the VP candidate for leftist Republican John McCain. LOL!
Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown
#26. To: X-15 (#13) (Edited)
Hell yeah! Everything you said there! ...Ron Paul would be the tie-breaker vote in the Senate. The prospect of the Senators having Ron Paul occasionally hanging around as President of the Senate, even in the limited role of that position, would cause great consternation amongst those scurrilous bastards.
I support the occupation
Fuck it if it kills me. Liberty before death.
#27. To: christine (#10)
It's not going to happen. This is just more shit the left wing Republican Paul haters are throwing into the mix in the hopes of demoralizing Dr. Paul's base and to discourage small government conservatives (if there is such a thing anymore) who put principle over party from voting for him in the primaries. i would be shocked if Paul agreed to this.
Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown
#28. To: Turtle (#23)
LBJ was in thick with House Speaker Sam Rayburn, it was no coincidence that LBJ was put on the ticket to placate the rest of the Demonrats and offset the Kennedy money/influence. JFK was not "one of the gang", his daddy's money/influence put him in the White House. A Harvard graduate was told to put some inbred hillbilly cowboy with a degree from some four-rate teacher's college on the ticket?
-Alex Kurtagic
#29. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#25)
i agree! i do think he's more serious about winning this time around because of his strategy to get the most delegates. the one thing that bothered me last time and this time too is his reluctance to point out the vote fraud that has occurred in the primaries. (good post as always) If he were to become a VP candidate to a status quo Republicrat he would be betraying that message and that movement.
#30. To: titorite (#0)
Sad when u think about it. Where's that tank of laughing gas? That would be I victory of sorts...
"Satan / Cheney in "08" 
#31. To: noone222 (#8)
Will not defeat a drone HellFire missile. Ron needs to wear a vest !
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
#32. To: Cynicom (#16)
Pretty sure of THAT. Certainly we could not be worse off.
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
#33. To: Jethro Tull (#17)
Can't figure why LJ called off the jets that could have easily chased away the USS Liberty Israel attackers. Nixon would have been better than LBJ, IMO.
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
#34. To: Jethro Tull (#21)
Good to know u didn't overpay. I'm going to a Guyana trained witch doctor in an hour to discuss my annual stone attack. Payment to be made with brightly painted shells and two medium sized chickens.
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
#35. To: christine, F.A. Hayek Fan (#29)
i agree! i do think he's more serious about winning this time around because of his strategy to get the most delegates. the one thing that bothered me last time and this time too is his reluctance to point out the vote fraud that has occurred in the primaries. I suspect the reasoning is that the MSM would portray it as "sour grapes". He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't on the vote fraud. And in the states using electronic vote fraud machines he's just f**ked. I'm not saying I agree with the reasoning but I suspect that is pretty close. If he were to become a VP candidate to a status quo Republicrat he would be betraying that message and that movement.
#36. To: Original_Intent (#35)
It's a bit early for this kind of speculation. Ron Paul is #2 in delegates and the convention is still 6 months away.
Ron Paul and his legions of spam monkeys ain’t gonna win shinola. - Jim Robinson
#37. To: Flintlock (#36)
While that might well be true in the age of the electronic voting machine Ron Paul could win a primary by a landslide margin and still be cheated out of it. At this point I am assuming from the available evidence that a majority, if not all, of the (s)elections are rigged and that any desired outcome can be dictated.
#38. To: Original_Intent (#37)
Well, they might be able to rig the Beauty Contest but they can't rig the delegates in the caucuses. Ron Paul is #2 in delegates, and we still have 6 months to go. While that might well be true in the age of the electronic voting machine Ron Paul could win a primary by a landslide margin and still be cheated out of it.
Ron Paul and his legions of spam monkeys ain’t gonna win shinola. - Jim Robinson
Comment #1
#39. To: Original_Intent (#37)
Pretty much my thoughts as well. . At this point I am assuming from the available evidence that a majority, if not all, of the (s)elections are rigged and that any desired outcome can be dictated.
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
#40. To: Flintlock (#38)
Ron Paul is #2 in delegates, and we still have 6 months to go. I don't want to piss in your Wheaties so I will relent, but color me cynical. Well, they might be able to rig the Beauty Contest but they can't rig the delegates in the caucuses.
#41. To: tom007 (#39)
Pretty much my thoughts as well. Once they were able to get a lot of states to set up the votefraud machines it was "Game! Set! Match!!!". The only way to get honest, or reasonably so, elections back is to return to hand marked, hand counted, hand verified, ballots. . At this point I am assuming from the available evidence that a majority, if not all, of the (s)elections are rigged and that any desired outcome can be dictated.
#42. To: Original_Intent (#40)
We all are, but we're growing exponentially everyday. Don't give up the ship! but color me cynical
Ron Paul and his legions of spam monkeys ain’t gonna win shinola. - Jim Robinson
Comment #1
#43. To: Flintlock (#42)
"Damn the Torpedoes and Full Speed Ahead!"
#44. To: Original_Intent (#43)
Yeah! What do we have to lose? "Damn the Torpedoes and Full Speed Ahead!"
Ron Paul and his legions of spam monkeys ain’t gonna win shinola. - Jim Robinson
Comment #1
#45. To: Original_Intent (#35)
I suspect the MSM would portray it as a "conspiracy theory" as well as "sour grapes." I suspect the reasoning is that the MSM would portray it as "sour grapes". He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't on the vote fraud.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#46. To: GreyLmist (#45)
I suspect the MSM would portray it as a "conspiracy theory" as well as "sour grapes." I stand corrected - they almost certainly would. I suspect the reasoning is that the MSM would portray it as "sour grapes". He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't on the vote fraud.
#47. To: Flintlock (#44)
Yeah! What do we have to lose? Our virginity? "Damn the Torpedoes and Full Speed Ahead!"
#48. To: tom007Jethro Tull (#33)
Tom... There is a long, enlightening answer to that, and there is a short answer. Short answer... One that views and reads the ancestry of LBJ learns that the apple falls not far from the tree. Can't figure why LJ called off the jets that could have easily chased away the USS Liberty Israel attackers.
#49. To: tom007 (#32)
Tom... Positive. Having lived eighty years of this country's decline, there is no one that can spin, twist nor dismiss the reality and result of those long years. Pretty sure of THAT.
#50. To: Jethro Tull (#21)
Don't try the "kool-aid" cure ... it's permanent ! I'm going to a Guyana trained witch doctor in an hour to discuss my annual stone attack. Payment to be made with brightly painted shells and two medium sized chickens.
"You assist an evil system most effectively by obeying its orders and decrees. An evil system never deserves such allegiance. Allegiance to it means partaking of the evil. A good person will resist an evil system with his or her whole soul."
Mahatma Gandhi
#51. To: Cynicom, tom007, All (#48)
Tom... There is a long, enlightening answer to that, and there is a short answer. Short answer... One that views and reads the ancestry of LBJ learns that the apple falls not far from the tree. My answer is that they were likely called off because that was the real attack- objective of LBJ and Israel in the first place...to recall the planes loaded with weapons, possibly with nuclear components, that would have to eject their weapons into the sea to land safely back on their ships. The pilots and most observers would think it just routine Standard Operating Procedure but Israel could then salvage those weapons covertly and bypass the arms embargo against it that Congress had implemented. All day long before the attack, the rescue planes had been flying practice runs with live ammo and were recalled then too without hitting their targets...told to jettison their arms into the sea. Can't figure why LJ called off the jets that could have easily chased away the USS Liberty Israel attackers.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#52. To: All (#51)
Am noting here that covertly arming Israel -- the enemy of our ally, Egypt -- would be somewhat comparable in pattern to Iran-Contra -- covertly arming Iran against our ally, Iraq. We could go back even farther and compare it to sleazebag War Profiteers covertly arming Native Americans against our Army and citizens.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest