[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Ron Paul See other Ron Paul Articles Title: WHAT RON PAUL'S DETRACTORS REVEAL By Chuck Baldwin WHAT RON PAUL'S DETRACTORS REVEAL By Chuck Baldwin February 23, 2012 It is no secret that I am a huge Ron Paul fan--and I have been for many years. Do I agree with him on every single issue? Of course not. And I don't have to agree with him on every single issue to know Ron Paul is the only true constitutionalist in the Presidential field--from either major party. And when a President (or any other public office holder) takes his or her oath of office, they do not swear to be a good conservative, or to be a good Christian, or to support the state of Israel, or to "create jobs," etc., etc. They swear to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. That is their solemn oath before God and the American people. Nothing more. Nothing less. And for over two decades, Congressman Ron Paul has demonstrated his fidelity to that oath. And for that, I can and must support him. In spite of Dr. Paul's stellar congressional record, however, there are large numbers of Republicans and "conservatives" that are his fiercest critics. I've even heard some "conservatives" say that they would rather see Barack Obama reelected than for Ron Paul to become President. Such is the lunacy of many so-called "conservatives" today. So, what is it about Ron Paul's detractors that cause them to despise him so much? What is their beef? They would never say that they would rather Obama be reelected than to see Mitt Romney, or Newt Gingrich, or Rick Santorum elected President. In fact, most of them spout the antiquated mantra, "Anybody but the Democrat (whoever it happens to be at the time)." Or, "At least Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, etc., won't take us over the cliff quite as fast as Obama." But when discussing Ron Paul, many "conservatives" take the position, "Anybody but Ron Paul." Why is this? What is it about this good man that so many good people can have such animosity toward him? I am convinced that these "conservatives" who oppose Ron Paul reveal much more about themselves than they do about Dr. Paul. Let me proffer a few observations. Observation Number One: We Have A Constitutionally Illiterate Society Many "conservatives" are woefully ignorant of the US Constitution, and when a constitutional scholar such as Ron Paul interjects the Constitution into the political debate, he is speaking a language that many of these "conservatives" simply do not understand. He might as well be speaking Spanish or French. To many "conservatives," the Constitution is a foreign language. For the better part of the Twentieth Century, the Constitution was ignored and neglected. Pastors have never studied the Constitution. Businessmen have never studied it. High school teachers and college professors have never studied it. Policemen and sheriff deputies have never studied it. Even attorneys and judges haven't studied the Constitution. Let's be honest: we have a constitutionally illiterate society today. As a result of this constitutional ignorance, people (including Christians and "conservatives") simply cannot fathom--much less appreciate--constitutional solutions to America's political woes. Dr. Paul knows the Constitution. He has studied it. He has read what America's Founding Fathers and framers have written about the Constitution. He has studied the enlightenment philosophers, theologians, and teachers--you know, the same ones that Thomas Jefferson and James Madison studied. He knows that the reason America is in the mess it is in today is because the Constitution has been abandoned. And he also knows that the only way to fix it (politically) is to return to constitutional governance. Therefore, when Dr. Paul talks about drugs, foreign policy, military adventurism, or even social issues, he does so from a constitutional point of reference. And the Constitution is clear when it comes to these matters. Domestic drug laws are the exclusive responsibility of the states--as is virtually every other law enforcement matter. Foreign entanglements, empire building, turning our military personnel into the world's policemen, etc., are all anathema to constitutional government. And the longer our political leaders continue to ignore the Constitution, the more America will continue to slide down this slippery slope in which we now find ourselves. Ron Paul's position on these matters is in historical agreement with America's Founding Fathers and the US Constitution. The following report outlines Dr. Paul's sagacity regarding so-called "social conservatism" and the proper role of constitutional government (the title of the news report notwithstanding) Dr. Paul's detractors demonstrate that they do not truly understand the US Constitution. Observation Number Two: Many "Conservatives" Have A Misguided Perception Of Ron Paul's Position On The State Of Israel. How many times have we heard Dr. Paul's critics say that Ron Paul is "against Israel"? Too many times to count. I have been with Ron Paul in public and private many times, and I have never heard the first anti-Semitic word come out of his mouth. Theologically speaking, you could not get a consensus of opinion from among the leading Biblical scholars and theologians regarding the modern state of Israel and Biblical prophecy if your life depended upon it. Many sincere Christians believe that the Biblical promises to Israel have all taken place in history past. Many sincere Christians believe that there are many promises to Israel that are yet future. And of these groups, many believe that the modern state of Israel is the fulfillment of Bible prophecy, while many others believe that the modern state of Israel has no relationship whatsoever to the future Davidic Kingdom. And the fact is, when it comes to America's foreign policy, it doesn't matter! Constitutionally, the President of the United States owes his loyalty and allegiance to only one country: The United States of America. He has no right to interfere with the internal affairs of any country--including Israel. He has no authority to give trillions of dollars of hard-earned taxpayer dollars of foreign aid to any country--including Israel. When Americans go to the polls this November, they will elect the President of the United States, not the Prime Minister of Israel. As far as any American President is concerned, Israel, like every other nation, should be judged on the basis of its actions, good or bad (as should our own nation be judged). Any American President should do everything in his power to cultivate peaceful trade relations with foreign countries, and to protect America's people and territory from those nations that would attempt to harm us--no matter who that nation is. Ron Paul's position on Israel is a constitutional one. He knows the US should stop meddling in her affairs and let her govern herself as she sees fit. Israel is a sovereign, independent nation fully capable of conducting her own affairs. What is amazing to me about so much of this Israel debate is the way many Christians ignore the fact that for every dollar the US gives to Israel, it gives at least four dollars to her Arab neighbors. Tell me again how this "blesses" Israel? How has America's foreign policy of manipulation and coercion into the political and commercial affairs of nations throughout the world (including the Middle East) "blessed" Israel--or any other nation, for that matter? Can anyone remember when Iran was our friend? And who was it that cut the legs out from under that friend and elevated a government that would become hostile to both the United States and Israel? The US State Department, that's who! Who orchestrated the rise to power of both Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein? The US State Department, CIA, etc., that's who! Who has repeatedly demanded that Israel swap "land for peace"? Various US Presidents and Secretaries of State, that's who! And what is currently stirring the pot of strife and hostility in the Middle East today? An interventionist US foreign policy, that's what! It is no accident that Ron Paul receives more support from American military personnel, active and retired, than all other GOP Presidential candidates combined. See this report. No matter what one's personal view of Biblical eschatology may be, the President of the United States is obligated to put the interests and safety of the people of the United States first! Period! How dare any President pander to ANY foreign country? How dare any President elevate ANY foreign nation to a position superior to the United States? And how dare any American citizen expect that our President would do either? Observation Number Three: Ron Paul's Detractors Must Not Comprehend The Existence Of The New World Order (NWO). Ladies and gentlemen, ever since the Woodrow Wilson administration, the United States has been increasingly under the influence of internationalists who desire to commercially merge the nations of the world into one global community. The United Nations is a major contributor to this agenda, as are a number of international organizations. The New World Order is not a fantasy; it is a developing reality! And Presidential administrations from both major parties have willingly collaborated with this draconian agenda. In fact, under Presidents George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, G.W. Bush, and now Barack Obama, globalization efforts have mushroomed exponentially. The Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, etc., are major players in the creation of a NWO, as is the military-industrial complex, the Federal Reserve, and international banks on both sides of the Atlantic. Another major component of the establishment of a New World Order is the burgeoning surveillance society and police state that both major parties in Washington, D.C., seem determined to implement. Ron Paul is the ONLY Presidential candidate from either major party that truly understands the New World Order and is determined to resist it. He's the only one! Mark it down, neither Romney, Santorum, nor Gingrich will lift a finger to resist the power elite inside the New World Order. They will do nothing to reverse the surveillance society taking shape in America. They will do nothing to resist the federal government's obsessive control-freaks who are running many federal bureaucracies. Either none of them understands it, or if they do, they are absolutely unwilling to lift a finger to resist it. I can only conclude that Ron Paul's detractors haven't a clue about the New World Order. They must not see it. They must not understand it. They must not be able to identify it. They must be totally ignorant about it, or else they would clearly appreciate Dr. Paul's knowledge and acumen when he seeks to warn people about it and put himself on the firing line to oppose it. Even if one disagrees with Dr. Paul regarding particular societal issues, one must admire Ron Paul's stand against the New World Order--especially since he is the only one opposing it! It is obvious to me that the only people who cannot appreciate Dr. Paul's courageous commitment against the NWO are those who totally do not understand it. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that everyone must agree with me and support Ron Paul for President. I know that good people can come to different conclusions in any political race. What I am saying is that it seems obvious to me that the vast majority of Dr. Paul's vocal detractors seem to demonstrate misperceptions--or even downright ignorance--in at least one or more of the above realities. Support him or not, vote for him or not, any honest American who understands constitutional government, who understands what a constitutional foreign policy should look like, and who understands and is concerned that America is in the throes of a burgeoning New World Order MUST at least appreciate and admire Congressman Ron Paul. And as for me, I SUPPORT, AND WILL VOTE FOR, RON PAUL! © 2012 Chuck Baldwin Poster Comment: "Ron Paul is the ONLY Presidential candidate from either major party that truly understands the New World Order and is determined to resist it. He's the only one! Mark it down, neither Romney, Santorum, nor Gingrich will lift a finger to resist the power elite inside the New World Order. They will do nothing to reverse the surveillance society taking shape in America. They will do nothing to resist the federal government's obsessive control-freaks who are running many federal bureaucracies. Either none of them understands it, or if they do, they are absolutely unwilling to lift a finger to resist it." Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)
Excellent post. The author does an excellent job of identifying the shortcomings of the American voter, i.e., ignorance.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.” —Samuel Adams
Great article.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton The human herd stampedes on the fields of facts and the valleys of truth to get to the desert of ignorance. Saman Mohammadi "If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would promise them missionaries for dinner." Mencken "..if the military is going to defend our freedoms, then we need freedoms to defend. Our freedoms must be restored before the military can defend them..." Lawrence M. Vance Você me trata desse jeito só porque eu sou preto. Junior (my youngest son)
Excellent post. The author does an excellent job of identifying the shortcomings of the American voter, i.e., ignorance. "Dr. Paul's detractors demonstrate that they do not truly understand the US Constitution."
Thanks. I have emailed this article to many people.
Phant... The blame lies at the feet of the founding Fathers, all their fault that we now have a totally corrupt "government". Why, you ask? The Fathers gave us the right to throw out the entire HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES every TWO YEARS, throw out the PRESIDENT every four years. Check the record, American VOTERS ....HAVE NEVER EXERCISED THAT RIGHT GIVEN BY THE CONSTITUTION. Instead we have members of congress staying for fifty years and or one hundred years olde. A few times a bumbling President gets the boot but with no change in course. The founding Fathers assumed we might be ignorant at times but not terminally stupid most of the time. They were wrong. They should have mandated that the House be fumigated every two years, without fail.
You're a smart ol' geezer, Cyni. I can't go that far as to blame the founding fathers, as they assumed future generations would appreciate what we have been given. On the other hand, I have NO problem blaming the American voter for allowing "members of congress staying for fifty years and/or one hundred years olde" and tolerating "a bumbling President", etc. Complacency and a society who feels entitled canNOT be blamed on our forefathers.
I will wait patiently while you scour the internet archives for any admission from any POLITICIAN THAT HAS EVER ADMITTED AND ACCEPTED BLAME FOR THE DOWNWARD SPIRAL OF THIS COUNTRY. Wilson came the closest but the Jews say his admission of guilt was a hoax.
Americans failed at the second revolution, the damned Yankees won, now we suffer the consequence. Perhaps we will have better luck next go around. There is indeed an amalgamated race called Americans, most refuse to consider that, but it remains true. Of that race, there is a tiny segment that has never joined except in name only. Their internationalist desire is to destroy all countries from within, something they succeeded at in this country. They are and have been unwanted worldwide for this very reason.
And every senator should leave after one six year term. If they had to go back home and live under the laws they passed they'd be very circumspect about the oppression that they heap upon us and from which they exempt themselves. Keep in mind that senators are generally wormier than reps and that is why the "US House Of Lords" refused to convict the equally wormy Bill Clinton despite ample proof of his guilt. "Why, Sen. Beauregard, if they can impeach a president then they can impeach a senator. And, ah for one refuse to set a precedent that could have unintended and undesirable consequences for mah colleagues and mahself." The most destructive thing we as voters could do is to allow congress to adjust their pay for inflation because they have no incentive to stand up to the crooks over at The FED. And, instead of passing laws they'd be looking for laws to repeal if returning home was a certainty. And, one of Parkinson's laws is, "Work expands so as to fill the time available." And that is why a part time job "grew like Topsy" into the best full time gig a crook could ever hope to land. ""Give me control of a nation's guitars and I care not who makes the laws". (Apologies to Mayer Amschel Rothschild)
ha! i love that!
Now that would be a lesson in futility ... to which I already know the answer.
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||