Angelina Jolie, Goodwill Ambassador to the UN and member of CFR, is now using her profile to promote NATOs genocidal humanitarian intervention war doctrine. In an interview with the Balkans branch of Al Jazeera (NATOs Ministry of Truth), Jolie (whose father has been a staunch defender of George W. Bush and who also visited Israel to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Nakba) promotes her new film In the Land of Blood and Honey, a pro-war propaganda set-piece centred around the humanitarian intervention. Set in Sarajevo, Jolies directorial debut aims to justify NATOs brutal butchery in Bosnia during the 1990s, and Jolie even specifically refers to Syria in her Al Jazeera interview. She puts forth a string of utterly hollow gripes about the inactivity of the international community as civilians suffer and die. Jolies selective morality means she doesnt once mention Libya a nation now butchered, fractured, and transformed into a torture state by NATOs genocidal humanitarian intervention; an estimated 100,000 innocent people slaughtered by the very same international community.
Most likely reading from her pre-defined talking points, Jolie even calls out Russia and China for using their veto powers against the ever benevolent international community vis-à-vis Syria.
I think Syria has gotten to a point, sadly, where some form of, certainly, where some sort of intervention is absolutely necessary.
Its so disheartening, its so sad, its so upsetting, its so horrible, whats happening
at this time we just must stop the civilians being slaughtered
when you see that sort of mass violence and murder on the streets we must do something. And I know that the countries in the region are pushing as well, so I feel that this is a good global effort, but then there are these countries that are choosing not to intervene and I dont feel, I feel very strongly that the use of a veto when you have financial interests in a country should be questioned, and the use of a veto against a humanitarian intervention should be questioned.