[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

I have NO words... Elon Musk's tunneling robot What's happening in Mexico is HORRIFYING and President Claudia Scheinbaum is in on it RFK Jr TORCHES Big Pharma Libs In Congress "You Tried For 20 Years, I Did It In 100 Days" Ed Martin Reveals J6 Pipe Bomber Probe Shakeup, Warns DOJ 'Much, Much Worse Than People Think' "Rogue" Devices Found Hidden In Chinese Solar Panels Could "Destroy The Grid" U.S. Deficit Hits $1.4 Trillion as China’s Surplus Climbs to $1.1 Trillion Breakdown in classrooms Students using AI can’t read write or solve basic math “Don’t you dare enforce the law!” Can the Annual Theft of $521,000,000,000 From the Federal Budget Be Stopped? Another conspiracy theory confirmed This should infuriate every American Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Nationwide Injunctions in Trump v. CASA Older Employees Can’t Retire – FORCED to Work Minimum Wage The Met Office is Unable to Name the Sites Providing Estimated Temperature Data For its 103 Non-Existent Stations EPA Targets Engine Start-Stop Systems In Cars Scientists find toxic metals linked to autism in popular toothpaste FRAGMENTS OF HIV-AIDS VIRUS INSIDE COVID VACCINES. Harvard Hammered: Feds Yank An Additional $450 Million In Grants TOTAL WAR: TRUMP SHUTS DOWN THE IRS 45,000 AGENTS FIRED! Netanyahu: Israel Will Finish War in Gaza, Drive Out 50% of Palestinians Something has to change with Big Pharma... NOW. Your Mitochondria Need THIS to Be Healthy. A Conversation with Nicolas Verhoeven, PhD Ben Shapiro MELTS DOWN Over Trump Deprioritizing Israel Tulsi Gabbard FIRES the Top Two Deep State Officials from the National Intelligence Council World Health Organization: 57 Children in Gaza Killed by Malnutrition Since March Amid Israeli Siege Pop Star Ed Sheeran Admits "Every Area Of London" Is Dangerous Now Dr. David Martin discusses a proposed bioweapons attack scheduled for July 2025. MSNBC horribly suggests the genocide against the SA refugees is justified. Cheap Tomatoes (And Immigration)

Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Does ANYONE here not have "out of wedlock" kids in your family or extended family? How has this harmed society?
Source: .
URL Source: http://.
Published: Feb 29, 2012
Author: me
Post Date: 2012-02-29 08:26:22 by Artisan
Keywords: None
Views: 628
Comments: 28

Is marriage irrelevant? I think definitely not. This planned breakdown of society is very tragic. The first generation of this accepted trend of kids without marriage, at least (generally) had financially stable married parents to help w/ the grandkids.

Poster Comment:

The next generation (the kids who were born out of wedlock) now has even less familial stability, parents with divorces, exs, halves, steps, financial woes, misery. THEIR kids are much worse off than even they were. Good grief make it stop.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

#10. To: Artisan (#0)

Here in Ecuador, there's a very high rate of infidelity compared to the USA, and I never appreciated the confusion it could cause till I came here. With a high rate of children born out of wedlock, there's a real loss of family definition which impacts identity and relations with others. For example 2 people may be half brothers, each with the same mother but different father which can really screw things up, so to speak. It can be a source of division at the teen level as one can ridicule the other. Also, people can have half-siblings out there that s/he has never met. Kids have 0 or perhaps 2 fathers, one basically adopted.

The confusion is pretty substantial. I can appreciate that having been in the company of it here.

Pinguinite  posted on  2012-02-29   18:04:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

that is too bad. the so-called sexual revolution definitely transcended international borders. i think it actually was an international conspiracy to destroy cohesive family unit & thus create serfs.

Artisan  posted on  2012-03-01   1:01:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

"...i think it actually was an international conspiracy to destroy cohesive family unit & thus create serfs."

You nailed this one great!

The true purpose of having children was to keep the aristocracy in place of the wealthy elite. There was no such thing as food stamps, social security, or other social benefits. Only the wealthy could afford to have children. And the purpose of having children was to keep the money in the family name through generations to follow. Marriage was a serious business and dowries had instrinsic value. An example would be the father bringing his daughter to a social function to be introduced to eligible respectable bachelors. Those bachelors had to meet the prong test by the father and mother as far as worthiness of marriage to the daughter. The idea of the daughter messing around town with men was a social disgrace as well as a disgrace to the family name. Any daughter who shamed the family name was disowned. This practice still goes on even today. In fact, I had a female roommate back in 1988 who was the same age as me. She got pregnant and when her parents found out about it, they threw her out on the streets and disowned her! Whether this pregnancy was planned or by accident (such as rape) her family would have nothing to do with it. She came from a very well-educated and affluent background and we became good friends. I felt sorry for her as she needed emotional support. I was going to night school and dating a law student and she was into computers. Very smart gal. However, our landlord at that time would not permit her to stay because, it went against his social norm system to rent out to women in distress like this. He was from the Middle East. He and I got along ok though. I was not allowed to bring men home to his place and I respected that. I was not into men anyway as I was focused on school. But my aunt was interested in him and she dated him a few times. He didn't like her because he already figured what she was up to. She was a gold-digger and a professional whore that slept with wealthy rich men. He even told me this himself. He worked in aerospace. She did nails for the wealthy elite. She finally married a jew who also saw her for what what she really was. When he and I were having a morning walk one day, he showed me his marriage ring. He told me that he had my aunt's wedding ring inscribed with the following in Hebrew: "Eat first or fuck first". I was stunned and asked him why he had that done. He told me that he already knew what my aunt was but that he was going to make the determination of her networth. By the inscription on the ring and having her sign a pre-nuptial agreement, so that she does not get her hands on inheritance money or property to his daughter, that's how he kept her in check. I don't know if I feel for my aunt or not.

purplerose  posted on  2012-03-01   10:22:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 27.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]