See other War, War, War Articles
Title: Osama NOT buried at sea. Sent to US for Cremation.
Source:
UK Daily Mail
URL Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art ... tion-leaked-emails-reveal.html
Published: Mar 6, 2012
Author: Thomas Durante
Post Date: 2012-03-06 18:42:49 by TommyTheMadArtist
Keywords: None
Views: 278
Comments: 21
The fate of Osama bin Laden's remains have been called into question after emails leaked from an intelligence analysis firm say the body of the terror leader was actually sent to the U.S. for cremation. Terrorist: Osama bin Laden was killed on May 1, 2011 in the now-famous raid by Navy SEAL Team Six at his secret Pakistan compound Terrorist: Osama bin Laden was killed on May 1, 2011 in the now-famous raid by Navy SEAL Team Six at his secret Pakistan compound According to the emails, the Al Qaeda boss was shot and killed during the famous Navy SEAL Team Six raid on his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, was transported back to the U.S. and cremated. The emails were allegedly obtained by the hacker group Anonymous from Stratfor, an organisation dealing with analysis of intelligence and geopolitical analysis. It's also known as the 'Shadow CIA'. Last week, Anonymous announced that it had gotten access to 2.7million of the firm’s confidential correspondences, and said they could provide 'the smoking gun for a number of crimes'. The hackers said Stratfor, based in Austin, Texas, were 'clueless' when it came to database security. After bin Laden was killed in the famous raid in Pakistan on May 2 2011, the Obama administration said his body was buried at sea off the USS Carl Vinson - in accordance with Islamic tradition. But in a particular set of emails given to WikiLeaks, the firm’s vice president for intelligence, Fred Burton, says he doubts the official White House version of what happened to bin Laden's body. Stratfor’s vice-president for intelligence, Fred Burton, says the body was 'bound for Dover, [Delaware] on [a] CIA plane' and 'onward to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Bethesda [Maryland]'. (More at the link above) Also, one other thing. This was up on Drudge, as the headline this morning. After about 15 minutes, it was about Super Tuesday, and NOTHING about Osama on the site. Drudge is likely coopted.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#0)
The State is a lying liar, it bites with stolen teeth. Tim Ossman, aka, OBL, has been dead for years.
Tim Ossman, aka, OBL, has been dead for years. I think this article confirms that Anonymous is a US and/or Israeli intelligence asset. SolvoSermo.Com Free speech Video Hosting
It was hard for me to believe the US gov would be satisfied with military grunts telling them that they killed OBL and dumped his body in the sea. Hell, the US still has smallpox samples they won't even destroy. Why would they destroy OBL's body, assuming he was ever even killed? Much easier to believe he was captured alive and is being held and tortured somewhere, all the more convenient with the world thinks his body is dead and gone. So convenient to have no trace of his remains to prove he's dead.
Not much of a smoking gun. Stratfor supposedly thought his body was being air-freighted back to the States (if these emails weren't forged). Stratfor is little more than a glorified blog with some analytic articles. Kind of a homegrown Texas geostrategic operation from I've been able to gather. They may be more credible than Debka but that isn't saying much. They also have not made clear what information they had about the transport of the body and where they got the info. It's awfully convenient when the supposed intel sources are confidential. Stratfor refuses to explain any of it and insist some of Wikileaks' published emails are forged. They have released all their site's content for free currently and the founder/CEO of Stratfor (a total tool) offers the following explanation. I'm George Friedman, founder and CEO of Stratfor. As most of you know, in December thieves hacked into Stratfor data systems and stole a large number of company emails, as well as private information of Stratfor subscribers and friends. Today Wikileaks is publishing the emails that were stolen in December. This is a deplorable, unfortunate -- and illegal -- breach of privacy. Some of the emails may be forged or altered to include inaccuracies. Some may be authentic. We will not validate either, nor will we explain the thinking that went into them. Having had our property stolen, we will not be victimized twice by submitting to questions about them. The disclosure of these emails does not mean that there has been another hack of Stratfor's computer and data systems. Those systems, which we have rebuilt with enhanced security measures, remain secure and protected. The release of these emails is, however, a direct attack on Stratfor. This is another attempt to silence and intimidate the company, and one we reject. As you can see, emails sent to many people about my resignation were clearly forged. We do not know what else has been manufactured. Stratfor will not be silenced, and we will continue to publish the geopolitical analysis our friends and subscribers have come to rely on. As we have said before, Stratfor has worked to build good sources in many countries around the world, as any publisher of geopolitical analysis would do. We are proud of the relationships we have built, which help our analysts better understand the issues in many of these countries through the eyes of people who live there. We have developed these relationships with individuals and partnerships with local media in a straightforward manner, and we are committed to meeting the highest standards of professional and ethical conduct. Stratfor is not a government organization, not is it affiliated with any government. The emails are private property. Like all private emails, they were written casually, with no expectation that anyone other than the sender and recipient would ever see them. And clearly, as with my supposed resignation letter, some of the emails may be fabricated or altered. Stratfor understands that this hack and the fallout from it have created serious difficulties for our subscribers, friends and employees. We again apologize for this incident, and we deeply appreciate the loyalty that has been shown to Stratfor since last year's hack. We want to assure everyone that Stratfor is recovering from the hack. We will continue to do what we do best: produce and publish independent analysis of international affairs. And we will be back in full operation in the coming weeks. We look forward to continuing to serve you.
Exactly so. And why has that junior OBL wife (and his other older wives) seem to have disappeared from the face of the earth? It is more than a little suspicious, given the trouble we go to to capture and interrogate far more minor players. OBL's intel would be worth far less if people still thought he was alive. And if it was known he was taken alive, the al-Q's would be more likely to execute procedures to deepen their cover, move their money, find new safehouses, change their comm setup, etc.
Whoever wrote this email, and whoever decided to make it public, has done considerable injury to the US. Even though this story of Bin Laden's body being kept and taken to the US is probably false, probably nothing but wild speculation by someone with no knowledgeable sources, etc., it puts Americans at risk throughout the Muslim world. Just as the disrespectful treatment of copies of Koran led to several deaths a very few weeks ago, the disrespectful treatment of a Muslim leader's body - even if he was adjudged a criminal by most of the world - will arouse a lot of animosity.
One must wonder if this is not more disinformation. For an intelligence operation to be credible, even a private one, they would have to know who really runs the world and that should be reflected in the documents. That leaves 2 possibilities. 1. Stratfor is incompetent. 2. The release was intentional disinformation. Personally I lean towards "2". When I first heard the claim that OBL's body was dumped at sea, I was immediately suspicious. It is simply very out of character for the US to do that sort of thing, and I think any objective person who reasons things through would agree. It *IS* certainly within the gov's character to report to the world it disposed of his body while keeping him alive and in secret custody. We already know that the "secret custody" think is very much in practice for the CIA and friends, and the US already has a historical record of swearing troops to secrecy for national security matters, so it's no stretch at all to suggest that they took OBL alive and still have him. We just don't know. That the gov apparently refused to return his body to the Taliban is reason to support such suspicion. If the gov was really concerned about pacifying the Afghan Taliban fighters, as they were when they condemned US troops peeing on dead Taliban fighters, then returning his body would have been the best thing to do. So why didn't they do it? There's no way I'm the only one who would be so suspicious, as most of the planet simply doesn't trust the USA.
Hi P- Could it be time for you to make a Ecuador report? U are living a very diff life than most of us. Quandoqueria. Hey Tom. Not much to report. But maybe I'm just used to things here. Rainy weather is passing and it's getting nicer out with more sunshine and blue skies. Figuring out whether to go another year in our 400/month 3.5 bathroom house, in a very nice gated community, or maybe we could do okay on a $300 house elsewhere. (I learned that 900/month is a good deal in the USA about now). I'll be putting in for citizenship here in a few months so I'll have 2 passports instead of just one. Great for those times when being a US citizen is more of a liability than a benefit. The government here is basically a monarchy at this point... elected president has pretty much the same powers as royalty did in the 1800's, I think, but at least there's no bureaucracy to micromanage everybody all the time, so it's pretty free. The town I'm in continues to grow. Roads are insufficient but that doesn't stop the builders from building or the people moving into town. Not much else changes. Fresh food still cheap. Weather pretty constant year round. Kinda miss the snowy weather. Beaches are warm. Mountains great scenery. People not very trustworthy... same ole same ole...
Alleged disrespectful treatment of the Koran in Iraq and Afghanistan. Alleged War Misconduct, Abuses, and War Crimes. Alleged Troop desecration of Taliban bodies. How many of our Troops have been killed and wounded, Iraqis and Afghans too, over unsubstantiated allegations by War Agendists and the War Porn Industry to ramp up hostilities so as to prolong the Wars and Occupations of those countries for their profits? Why is it that people who instinctively distrust the Media suddenly never do anytime some alleged claim is reported by it against our Military? Look at these films here and here. Why does anyone believe those are our Troops instead of crews of propaganda actors to cause harm to our Military and the people of those countries? Those are not the uniforms or boots either of American forces -- no American insignia at all to be seen. People are dead, maimed, suffering, the Wars refueled, because of illusionists that even the alternative media and readers refuse to arrest in disbelief. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Maybe. Or Wikileaks/Anonymous is a CIA front. Or Wikileaks is forging material just to make some news.
We claimed (for domestic consumption) that we buried him according to Islamic tradition. Not true. The Guardian: Others used the sea burial question to question whether he was dead at all, with doubts fuelled by the absence of authentic photographs of his corpse. US officials said tests using DNA from several of Bin Laden's family members had provided "virtual certainty" that it was his body. A woman believed to be one of Bin Laden's wives identified the al-Qaida leader, and he was visually identified by members of the US raiding party, the Pentagon said. Burying him on land could have led to his grave becoming a focus of contention and pilgrimage as well as posing tough questions about where he should be laid to rest. . . . Senior US officials told news agencies that his body was disposed of in accordance with Islamic tradition, which involves ritual washing, shrouding and burial within 24 hours. The 24-hour rule has not always been applied in the past. For example, the bodies of Uday and Qusay Hussein – sons of the Iraqi dictator Saddam – were embalmed and held for 11 days after they were killed by US forces. Their bodies were later shown to media, provoking some angry responses. . . . In terms of the basic requirements for Muslim burials, standard practice involves placing the body in a grave with the head pointed toward the holy city of Mecca. Burial at sea is rare in Islam, though Muslim websites say it is permitted in certain circumstances. One is during a long voyage where the body may decompose and pose a health hazard to a ship's passengers, an exception noted on Monday by Tunisian scholar Ahmed al-Gharbi. Another is if there is a risk of enemies digging up a and grave and exhuming or mutilating the body. Dr Saud al-Fanisan, former dean of the faculty of sharia law in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, said that if a body was buried at sea it should be protected from fish. In the words of alislam.org, the body should be lowered into the water "in a vessel of clay or with a weight tied to its feet". Mohammed al-Qubaisi, Dubai's grand mufti, said of Bin Laden's burial: "They can say they buried him at sea, but they cannot say they did it according to Islam. Sea burials are permissible for Muslims in extraordinary circumstances. This is not one of them." Abdul-Sattar al-Janabi, who preaches at Baghdad's Abu Hanifa mosque, said: "What was done by the Americans is forbidden by Islam and might provoke some Muslims. "It is not acceptable and it is almost a crime to throw the body of a Muslim man into the sea. The body of Bin Laden should have been handed over to his family to look for a country to bury him." So much for this fiction of Muslims burying anyone at sea or that we followed Islamic tradition. We should have buried him in a secret grave (like deep in the Sahara or the Saudi desert) but with proper ritual.
Tim Ossman, aka, OBL, has been dead for years. I agree with you. Someone who was on kidney dialysis back at the turn of the century was already very sick and it is doubtful he hung about all those years waiting for someone to kill him. I suspect the disease killed him a long time ago. Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton The human herd stampedes on the fields of facts and the valleys of truth to get to the desert of ignorance. Saman Mohammadi "If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would promise them missionaries for dinner." Mencken "..if the military is going to defend our freedoms, then we need freedoms to defend. Our freedoms must be restored before the military can defend them..." Lawrence M. Vance Você me trata desse jeito só porque eu sou preto. Junior (my youngest son)
It's like a formula by the Warmongers...anything they concoct to keep the killing and destruction going on they want us to run with like it must be the truth because they and their Death-Cult groupies said so. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
yep....The USA is based on delusion and lies, it is time for a purge of the herd.
Maybe. Or Wikileaks/Anonymous is a CIA front. Or Wikileaks is forging material just to make some news. I am about 97% certain that WeakeyLinks is someone's intel operation - likely CIA/Tavistock. Personally I lean towards "2". Or Osama died at Tora Bora ten years ago. Or they captured him and he's undergoing torture in Thailand or Romania. We'll never know what really happened.
Or they are patsies serving multiple purposes. First, spread crucial disinformation as a setup for other CIA projects. Second, provide fall guys and justification for the huge push to silence any whistleblowers permanently.
That is pretty much how I read it early on. Track the whistleblowers and if they know anything too damaging they "have an accident". It does track. Look at Obama's war on whistleblowers, far worse than anything a GOP president did in the modern era.
#2. To: Lysander_Spooner (#1)
The State is a lying liar, it bites with stolen teeth.
Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit, because he doesn't come over your property and break your windows. - Dave Hebel
#3. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#0)
#4. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#0)
According to the emails, the Al Qaeda boss was shot and killed during the famous Navy SEAL Team Six raid on his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, was transported back to the U.S. and cremated.
George Friedman on Email Theft and the Wikileaks Release
Transcript:
#5. To: Pinguinite (#3)
Much easier to believe he was captured alive and is being held and tortured somewhere, all the more convenient with the world thinks his body is dead and gone. So convenient to have no trace of his remains to prove he's dead.
#6. To: TooConservative (#4)
#7. To: TooConservative (#4)
#8. To: Shoonra (#6)
Even though this story of Bin Laden's body being kept and taken to the US is probably false, probably nothing but wild speculation by someone with no knowledgeable sources, etc., it puts Americans at risk throughout the Muslim world.
#9. To: Pinguinite (#3)
"Satan / Cheney in "08" 
#10. To: tom007 (#9)
#11. To: Shoonra, All (#6)
Whoever wrote this email, and whoever decided to make it public, has done considerable injury to the US. Even though this story of Bin Laden's body being kept and taken to the US is probably false, probably nothing but wild speculation by someone with no knowledgeable sources, etc., it puts Americans at risk throughout the Muslim world. Just as the disrespectful treatment of copies of Koran led to several deaths a very few weeks ago, the disrespectful treatment of a Muslim leader's body - even if he was adjudged a criminal by most of the world - will arouse a lot of animosity.
#12. To: Original_Intent (#7)
2. The release was intentional disinformation.
#13. To: Shoonra, Pinguinite (#6)
Even though this story of Bin Laden's body being kept and taken to the US is probably false, probably nothing but wild speculation by someone with no knowledgeable sources, etc., it puts Americans at risk throughout the Muslim world. Just as the disrespectful treatment of copies of Koran led to several deaths a very few weeks ago, the disrespectful treatment of a Muslim leader's body - even if he was adjudged a criminal by most of the world - will arouse a lot of animosity.
Osama bin Laden's burial at sea was quickly criticised by Muslim scholars who claimed it had breached sharia law and warned that it may provoke calls for revenge attacks against US targets.
#14. To: Lysander_Spooner (#1)
The State is a lying liar, it bites with stolen teeth.
#15. To: TooConservative (#13)
Osama bin Laden's burial at sea was quickly criticised by Muslim scholars who claimed it had breached sharia law and warned that it may provoke calls for revenge attacks against US targets.
#16. To: James Deffenbach (#14)
#17. To: TooConservative (#12)
2. The release was intentional disinformation.
#18. To: Original_Intent (#7)
2. The release was intentional disinformation.
#19. To: Original_Intent (#17)
I am about 97% certain that WeakeyLinks is someone's intel operation - likely CIA/Tavistock.
#20. To: TooConservative (#19)
Or they are patsies serving multiple purposes. First, spread crucial disinformation as a setup for other CIA projects. Second, provide fall guys and justification for the huge push to silence any whistleblowers permanently.
#21. To: Original_Intent (#20)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest