[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

MN Gunman’s Pot Use Is Further Evidence Against Rescheduling Marijuana

Intense Exercise is Best

New Cars Are George Orwell 1984 Compliant

PEGASUS EVENT 201

Over Half Of Berlin's New Police Recruits Can't Speak Basic German, Officials Admit

Thomas Massie NAMES Epstein as a CIA and Israeli Asset

How Chickens See the World (Its CRAZIER Than You Think)

You remember TommyTheMadArtist?

Joe Rogan on the Belgian Malinois

Democrat New Mexico Governor Admits National Guard Making Progress In High-Crime Albuquerque

Florida banning vaccine mandates

To Prevent Strokes, Take Potassium.

Lawyer for Epstein VICTIMS Shares Details Trump FEARED THE MOST

WW3? French Hospitals Told To Prepare For A "Major Military Engagement" Within Six Months

The Zionist Experiment Is Over

Sen. Tim Kaine: ‘Extremely Troubling’ to Say Natural Rights Are from God

Israel & The Assassination Of The Kennedy Brothers

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER (Documentary)

The Pakistani mayor of Rotherham claims she proud to be British and proud to be Pakistani.

Khe Sanh 1968 How U.S. Marines Faced the Siege in Vietnam

Did Xi's Parade Flip The Script On US Defense Of Taiwan?

Cascade Volcanoes Show Weird Pulse Without Warning – Mount Rainier Showing Signs of Trouble!

Cash Jordan: Chicago Apartments RAIDED... ICE 'Forcibly Evicts' Illegal Squatters at 3AM

We are FINALLY turning the tide on 9/11 - The TRUTH is coming out | Redacted w Clayton Morris

Netanyahu SHAKEN as New Hostage Video DESTROYS IDF Lies!

We are FINALLY turning the tide on 9/11 VIDEO

Shocking Video Shows Ukrainian Refugee Fatally Stabbed On Charlotte Train By Career Criminal

Man Identifies as Cat to Cop

his video made her stop consuming sugar.

Shot And Bothered - Restored Classic Coyote & Road Runner Looney Tunes Cartoon 1966


Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: No Paul = No Vote in November
Source: The Daily Bell
URL Source: http://www.thedailybell.com/3693/Ro ... nd-No-Paul-No-Vote-in-November
Published: Mar 10, 2012
Author: Ron Holland
Post Date: 2012-03-10 15:09:12 by Flintlock
Keywords: None
Views: 1498
Comments: 104

"I would also say of Ron Paul – he doesn't need to win. In his view he is winning already. This is an ideological point he is making. But here's why it's electorally significant – a lot of people, I mean 41 percent in Virginia, only two people on the ballot, still a lot of people voted for Ron Paul. A lot of those voters are portable. They're not Republican – they're not dedicated Republican voters." – Tucker Carlson, Editor, The Daily Caller

It is time for a groundswell of Ron Paul supporters to quietly, respectfully but firmly make their position clear to the mainstream media and the GOP establishment. Simply put, "No Paul on the ticket means no vote for the GOP in November."

The Ron Paul Campaign has the GOP establishment stuck between a rock and a hard place even though they have not won a single state in the primaries to date. Every Paul supporter knows the underhanded tactics used by the Republican leadership at the state and national level as well as the organized smear and news blackout campaign carried out by the mainstream media.

Making Nice For the November Election

As we move into the last months of the GOP presidential nomination campaign, most of the establishment media are now "making nice" with Ron Paul and his supporters. He actually gets questions during the debates, some press coverage and the other candidates seem friendly. The reason is simple. The Republican Party desperately needs the votes of Ron Paul supporters in order to win in November against Obama.

Obviously, Virginia Heffernan didn't get the memo in her typical anti-Paul elitist drivel titled Ron Paul's Pointless Internet Presidency posted on Yahoo earlier in the week but now this is the exception rather than standard procedure for the press. The word has gone out to be nice and respectful to Ron Paul so they can get our votes in November.

Too Little Too Late

The Republican establishment has obviously done its homework with focus groups, polling, etc. and here is their situation. Although they have successfully held back the Ron Paul campaign to date from threatening to win the GOP presidential nomination, in the dirty tricks process they have ostracized the substantial Paul voting constituency even more from the GOP than before.

Paul supporters are far more than portable as suggested by Tucker Carlson; rather they are toxic toward the GOP elites and very few will now support any of the establishment candidates after the abusive treatment given to Ron Paul as well as the crude attacks against Paul supporters.

I well understand these feelings of resentment, as I am a Ron Paul supporter. There is no way I will vote for either Romney, Santorum or Gingrich, although I certainly prefer their fake rhetoric to the Obama propaganda. If Ron Paul isn't the Republican nominee for president, then the establishment nominee desperately needs the votes of his supporters in order to beat Obama in the fall general election.

The establishment knows the Gingrich and Santorum voters in the GOP Presidential primary will eventually vote for Mitt Romney in November if he wins the Republican presidential nomination at the GOP convention beginning on August 27th, 2012. They also know and fear that most Ron Paul supporters will not vote for the nominee and will likely stay away from the polls in droves thus hurting the other Republican candidates for the House and Senate as well for state and local elections. Basically, 15% of the GOP primary voters will sit out the 2012 November election and this almost guarantees the re-election of Barack Obama.

Why Don't I Really Care If the Democrats or Republicans Win in November?

My answer is regardless of whether Romney or Obama wins the general election despite all the anti-Obama rhetoric by the Republican establishment, little will change on major issues. Romney's campaign promises are identical to all other presidential campaign promises, much to do about nothing. Neither Bush nor Obama kept their campaign promises and neither will Romney.

Course of Action

First, we redouble our efforts in voting and funding the Ron Paul Campaign up through the final primary and caucus.

Second, in editorials, articles or discussions with the press or GOP leadership always emphasize your plans to stay at home on election day if a Ron or Rand Paul is not on the ticket.

Third, at the Republican National Convention when the presidential nomination is handed to Romney, assuming he wins, we continue to stress "NO PAUL = NO VOTE IN NOVEMBER."

Finally, we then wait at the convention for the personal phone call from Mitt Romney following private preliminary discussions where Rand Paul is asked to be the Vice Presidential candidate on a Romney/Paul ticket after assurances Ron Paul will be nominated for an appropriate cabinet level appointment such as Secretary of the Treasury or Defense.

Ron Paul deserves some family time off following the years of campaigning and educating the American people about liberty. He has done more to advance the cause of limited government, peace, liberty and free markets than any American since the time of the American Revolution.

Mitt Romney has spent the last seven years running for President of the United States so obviously he really wants to win. Romney and his advisors must know that without the 15% plus of GOP voters supporting Ron Paul who, unlike Gingrich and Santorum supporters, will sit the election out, he cannot defeat Barack Obama without our support. His only option is to put a "Paul" on the ticket.

Although a Vice President Rand Paul is a great tactical victory, this is only a battle in a long war for the restoration of liberty and legitimate constitutional government to the United States.

When I was a young man in the military during the 1970s, I well remember the antiwar crowds shouting "Hell, no, we won't go!" in opposition to the Vietnam War. Today, 40-plus years later, I'm a grandfather and maybe older and wiser but still willing to a little more respectfully tell the same power elites running this country and both political parties, "Hell, no, I won't go." But this time it is to the polls in November unless there is a Paul on the ticket.

Will you join me?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 52.

#11. To: Flintlock, All (#0)

This is the smartest move and perhaps the only opening left on the chessboard for Paul supporters.

If they register their protest by simple non-participation, they will forever be defending against an indictment for being the spoilers, and for being the ones that brought on a second term for that Joker in the White House.

Myself, I'm not keen on a mainstream GOP victory or a repeat and amplification of what we now suffer from. I'm of the somewhat cranky opinion that another four years is just what the country requires to wake from its slumber. We haven't learned our lesson yet, and given what a rough ride we may be in for, I'd love to see the students of Bill Ayres and Soros reap the whirlwind when the inevitable blowback arrives. But then, who knows what further constitutional damage will bed inflicted on this country before 2016?

Then again, you know a guy like Mitt has the Itch, and the only way that he can scratch it is by satisfying the zionist demand for More War. And more war is probably what we'll get eventually with the current wise guy in office at any rate along with inevitably more constitutional mayhem.

The drawback to the plan suggested in the article above is that if we go in with Mitt in a VP bargain, we are also complicit in what his administration has in store for us. That is some medicine that I don't think I can choke down with the finest Tennessee bottled in bond, of which I think I'm going to have lay in a respectable supply before November.

I may very well sit this one out.

randge  posted on  2012-03-10   16:50:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: randge (#11)

If they register their protest by simple non-participation, they will forever be defending against an indictment for being the spoilers, and for being the ones that brought on a second term for that Joker in the White House

If one scrutinizes that argument, they find it also will not hold water.

First...Blacks alone DID NOT AND CANNOT ELECT OBAMA.

It takes a few million WHITES TO DO THE BIDDING OF THE SYSTEM.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-03-10   17:07:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Cynicom (#15)

If they register their protest by simple non-participation, they will forever be defending against an indictment for being the spoilers, and for being the ones that brought on a second term for that Joker in the White House

If one scrutinizes that argument, they find it also will not hold water.

First...Blacks alone DID NOT AND CANNOT ELECT OBAMA.

It takes a few million WHITES TO DO THE BIDDING OF THE SYSTEM.

I don't know if you understood what I was driving at.

I am saying win or lose in November, if Paul folks do a deal for VP, and vote republican, they will avoid the charge that they were the ones that put Bammy over the top.

randge  posted on  2012-03-10   17:30:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: randge (#19)

I am saying win or lose in November, if Paul folks do a deal for VP, and vote republican, they will avoid the charge that they were the ones that put Bammy over the top.

I am saying those that cry, "vote or Obama is your fault" need to do some serious self educating.

If one votes and truly understands that the system is rigged, then, fine and dandy, by all means vote.

Watch until Romney is "chosen" by the multitude.

Then Romney will be all over Paul as a true American, a man among men etc etc etc. If Paul salutes and walks away, we have been had one more time.

If Paul stands up and demands a pound of flesh and a quart of blood in exchange for support, we will have a new ballgame. Will he?????

Cynicom  posted on  2012-03-10   17:44:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Cynicom (#21)

If Paul salutes and walks away, we have been had one more time.

If Paul stands up and demands a pound of flesh and a quart of blood in exchange for support, we will have a new ballgame. Will he?????

That'll probably be the only interesting thing to watch in this latest mock election.

My money is on "salute and walk away", FWIW.

Esso  posted on  2012-03-10   18:08:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Esso (#25)

My money is on "salute and walk away", FWIW.

Sometimes I suspect you have a periscope into my inner sanctum???????

Odds are Paul will not DEMAND anything immediate.

My theory, shared by no one else, is that Paul is running this time for...RAND PAUL in 2016.

Santorum is the Bush family in disguise.

Newtie is a POS.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-03-10   18:14:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Cynicom (#30)

Santorum is the Bush family in disguise.

Newtie is a POS.

It isn't hard to keep from voting when the Dems have a Communist running who has already torn up the Constitution, and the GOP shows they do not respect honesty and consistency.

You are wrong about Santorum. He shares the title of POS with Newt.

I would love to see Paul stand up and demand a pound of flesh, but your speculation is most likely correct, i.e., that he is running for Rand in '16.

At the end of the day the Americans will again be proved to have been duped into thinking they chose the winner. The evildoers will not lose ... whoever is POTUS is there because that is who they wanted.

Phant2000  posted on  2012-03-10   21:41:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Phant2000, Jethro Tull, Esso, randge, noone222, Christine (#36)

I often wonder why Ron Paul, in the name of education, does not explain the one easy and bloodless method of removing this government.

Paul should hammer into the voters heads, that eight months from now they CAN AND SHOULD REMOVE THE ENTIRE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. Explain it to the people, the power is in their hands and they have never used it.

The criteria???? No incumbent gets an American vote, party be damned.

Be done with that long list of losers, Peeloosely, Boner etc etc.

Clean house. People here say Paul is educating, well, if so, let him explain how easy it is to rid ourselves of this corrupt government.

The founding Fathers, planned it, we are too damned stupid to use it.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-03-10   22:02:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Cynicom, All (#37) (Edited)

Paul should hammer into the voters heads, that eight months from now they CAN AND SHOULD REMOVE THE ENTIRE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. Explain it to the people, the power is in their hands and they have never used it.

The criteria???? No incumbent gets an American vote, party be damned.

If Ron Paul, with his massive support base, hasn't been able to win a single state due to the corruption of our elections, I don't see how that tactic would work. Somehow I think that it wouldn't matter if no incumbents got any votes. They'd still be reported as the winners -- or whoever the control freaks prefered instead, as in the case of Kucinich being ejected by their incumbent Warbot Kaptur. Still, Ron Paul supporters should not sit out the vote, imo, unless they are unable for some reason to go to the polls and write him in.

Edited for grammar.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-03-11   10:02:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 52.

#54. To: GreyLmist, Phant2000, Jethro Tull, randge, noone222 (#52)

I don't see how that tactic would work.

Perhaps you are still thinking along party lines.

The Founding Fathers were not so much concerned about party as they were about having an immediate resolution to any "cabal" running counter to the interest of the people.

To accomplish that and to bring fresh blood into the system, an election every two years for all was given as a relief valve. But the Fathers were wrong in their assumption, the voters have never availed themselves of this protection.

Instead, we have seen men stay in government until age 100, or some "serving" fifty years or more.

Party members have the impression that the longer a man resides in Washington, the better he becomes. The truth is just the opposite.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-03-11 10:22:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: GreyLmist (#52)

Still, Ron Paul supporters should not sit out the vote, imo, unless they are unable for some reason to go to the polls and write him in.

They don't count write ins where I live so that would be an exercise in futility--and even if they claimed to count them, since they have stolen and "failed to report" votes that Ron actually got, how could a write in be anything but an unacknowledged and thrown away protest vote? Can you not protest the system as well by saying screw you and refusing to take part in what you already know to be a rigged game?

James Deffenbach  posted on  2012-03-11 11:35:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 52.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]