[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination

How They Control the World and Their Secret Weapon


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Exclusive: O'Keefe Video Exposes Voter Fraud-Friendly Policies in Vermont
Source: Breitbart.com
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern ... ndly%20Policies%20in%20Vermont
Published: Mar 13, 2012
Author: Christian Hartsock
Post Date: 2012-03-13 11:02:48 by Phant2000
Keywords: None
Views: 173
Comments: 8

James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas has released a new video exposing just how easy it is to commit voter fraud in Vermont.

The video, a sequel to O'Keefe's "Primary of the Living Dead" in New Hampshire, shows a Veritas agent entering various voting places around the state of Vermont, giving a different name each time. Each time, he is given a ballot without showing an ID, to his disbelief.

In the video, the agent repeatedly requests (but does not take) a Republican primary ballot. As he explained to http://Breitbart.com: "We wanted to remind viewers this is not a partisan issue. This is a situation wherein anyone -- Republican or Democrat -- can exploit the system."

The new video follows in the wake of a highly-politicized media attack on Mr. O’Keefe after his exposure of voter fraud in New Hampshire. Those videos resulted in calls from the left for O’Keefe’s arrest. However, the videos soon resulted in the New Hampshire State Senate passing a new bill requiring voter ID.

O'Keefe's new video from Vermont could not be more timely, coming the day after the U.S. Department of Justice's civil rights division blocked a Texas photo ID requirement for voters--to the applause of the American Civil Liberties Union, which claimed that the law was “discriminatory” against “Latinos, African-Americans, elderly citizens, and others.”

As the Project Veritas video shows, the current system in Vermont discriminates against actual legal voters, who must face the prospect of disenfranchisement by those who would vote in their stead illegally, or have their votes cancelled out by those voting illegally in place of deceased voters who have yet to be removed from the rolls. If it is not discriminatory for Vermont citizens to be required to show ID to get married or buy alcohol, it is certainly not discriminatory to make them show ID to vote.

“It is a national disgrace that ballots can be given out in the names of dead people,” O’Keefe told http://Breitbart.com. “Threats of government intimidation will not stop us from protecting the integrity of the ballot box. If any state has a system which encourages ballots to be given out to the wrong person, dead or alive, we will come to your state, we will film your poll workers, and Project Veritas will put the videos on YouTube. States like Vermont and New Hampshire have to take dead people off voter registration forms and clean up their act, once and for all.”


Poster Comment:

More confirmation that the voting process is designed by the evildoers to give us the men and women they want in office.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Phant2000 (#0)

If it is not discriminatory for Vermont citizens to be required to show ID to get married or buy alcohol, it is certainly not discriminatory to make them show ID to vote.

Good point.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-03-13   12:00:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Phant2000 (#0)

Clif High's Vote Reform suggestion: Yet another screwy idea.... open source, transparent, global voting.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-03-13   12:07:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: GreyLmist (#1)

Good point.

It is a good point, Grey, but not good enough for our Attorney General or POTUS to understand. After all, they will need the votes in November from every one or thing they can drag to the polls.

Phant2000  posted on  2012-03-13   12:29:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: GreyLmist (#2)

Clif High's Vote Reform suggestion ...

Is at least a start to changing a corrupt system. We need to do something different, because what we have is too easy for the evildoers to work around to their benefit.

Phant2000  posted on  2012-03-13   12:36:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Phant2000 (#3)

It is a good point, Grey, but not good enough for our Attorney General or POTUS to understand. After all, they will need the votes in November from every one or thing they can drag to the polls.

Am not convinced we have a valid POTUS per Article II. No matter how many votes an invalid candidate could get, they'd still be invalid.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-03-13   12:44:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Phant2000 (#4)

Clif High's Vote Reform suggestion ...

Is at least a start to changing a corrupt system. We need to do something different, because what we have is too easy for the evildoers to work around to their benefit.

Another suggestion at 4um title: [Video] David Bismark: E-voting without fraud

Also, I liked that the voter's signature was written next their Presidential votes in the Washington State Caucus -- no secret ballot. See at 1:40 in the video posted here at #7.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-03-13   13:00:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: GreyLmist (#5)

Am not convinced we have a valid POTUS per Article II. No matter how many votes an invalid candidate could get, they'd still be invalid.

I'm on the same page as you with our POTUS and ALL his appointments.

Phant2000  posted on  2012-03-13   17:05:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: GreyLmist (#6)

I liked that the voter's signature was written next their Presidential votes in the Washington State Caucus

I like that, as well.

Phant2000  posted on  2012-03-13   17:08:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]