See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: Ron Paul campaign bleeds cash
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74124.html
Published: Mar 17, 2012
Author: Politico
Post Date: 2012-03-17 14:33:39 by Jethro Tull
Ping List: *Stick a fork in it* Subscribe to *Stick a fork in it*
Keywords: None
Views: 388
Comments: 36
Ya' gotta admit at least he didn't do an '08 on us. War on AmeriKa, war on!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
Like the stock brokers say: "I made money. The brokerage made money. Two out of three ain't so bad right?" Ron Paul says he WILL free non-violent drug offenders. Meat Loaf sure thinks so :P
I did my part. I guess most American people like living in servitude to the Federal Reserve and Zionism.
Ron Paul says he WOULD HAVE voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
#2. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#1)
Two out of three ain't so bad right?
#3. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
-Alex Kurtagic
#4. To: X-15, Phant2000, Jethro Tull, Christine (#3)
We all know what would bring the cash rolling again, including mine??????
#5. To: Cynicom (#4)
I can think of a few things, what's on your mind??
-Alex Kurtagic
#6. To: X-15 (#5)
I thot no one would ask. Ron Paul make it known that he is in this thing to the bitter end. With that, regardless of who wins, he and his supporters will demand concessions in return for support of the candidate. If that is NOT forthcoming, Paul will run third party in his last effort to warn Americans of what lies ahead. I would rather he go down raising hell across the political spectrum, naming names, make all his work in the past worth while. I would rather get shot down than to lie down. If Ron does, it will be a losing cause as for the Presidency but a winner in awakening Americans. I will stop sitting on my two bucks. what's on your mind??
#7. To: Cynicom (#6)
A scorched-earth campaign, eh?? How much would that affect Rand Paul if he decides to run in 2016??
-Alex Kurtagic
#8. To: X-15 (#7)
You been reading tween the lines???? I say Ron is running now for Rand in 2016, no one agrees. If he is, there will be no third party run nor any withholding of support for Romney. Count on it. I do not see Ron going all in and calling. A scorched-earth campaign, eh?? How much would that affect Rand Paul if he decides to run in 2016??
#9. To: Cynicom (#8)
I happen to agree with your speculation that Ron is running now for Rand. I also wish he would go all the way and name names and let the American public know from a fellow congressman just what the hell they have on their hands. I do not see Ron going all in and calling.
#10. To: Phant2000 (#9)
From elder Rep. Lindbergh in 1912 thru Rep. McFadden in the 1930s to Ron Paul, one hundred years later, regardless of their warnings, the Fed Res still owns and operates this government. One hundred years of warnings for nothing.
#11. To: Cynicom, 4um (#10)
What do you make of this, OM?
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#12. To: Cynicom (#10)
It is a sad commentary on our society, but I'm sure it is exactly what the evildoers expected. The Americans could make their disgust known in a succinct manner if they just voted for anyone but an incumbent come November. ... one hundred years later, regardless of their warnings, the Fed Res still owns and operates this government.
#13. To: Esso (#11)
I read that 2x, EMan. What am I missing?
#14. To: Cynicom (#8)
I don't discount your assessment of Ron Paul's 2012 campaign being the foundation of Rand Pauls' 2016 campaign. I say Ron is running now for Rand in 2016, no one agrees.
-Alex Kurtagic
#15. To: Esso, Jethro Tull, Phant2000, Christine (#11)
Skim reading... This is the most important part of this EO... It pertains you to, me and most Americans that believe we are free. "PART VI - LABOR REQUIREMENTS Sec. 601. Secretary of Labor. (a) The Secretary of Labor, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other agencies, as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, shall: (1) collect and maintain data necessary to make a continuing appraisal of the Nation's workforce needs for purposes of national defense; (2) upon request by the Director of Selective Service, and in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, assist the Director of Selective Service in development of policies regulating the induction and deferment of persons for duty in the armed services; (3) upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this order, consult with that agency with respect to: (i) the effect of contemplated actions on labor demand and utilization; (ii) the relation of labor demand to materials and facilities requirements; and (iii) such other matters as will assist in making the exercise of priority and allocations functions consistent with effective utilization and distribution of labor; (4) upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this order: (i) formulate plans, programs, and policies for meeting the labor requirements of actions to be taken for national defense purposes; and (ii) estimate training needs to help address national defense requirements and promote necessary and appropriate training programs; and (5) develop and implement an effective labor management relations policy to support the activities and programs under this order, with the cooperation of other agencies as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Federal Labor Relations Authority, the National Mediation Board, and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. (b) All agencies shall cooperate with the Secretary of Labor, upon request, for the purposes of this section, to the extent permitted by law...
#16. To: Cynicom, X-15, All (#6)
I would rather get shot down than to lie down. If Ron does, it will be a losing cause as for the Presidency but a winner in awakening Americans. I will stop sitting on my two bucks. If the stupid Americans haven't gotten the message by now, they never will. He has spoken wolumes upon volumes explaining "a lot" of our problems and the sheep continue ignoring him, or they continue buying into the two vile parties BS they are fed. The "awakening" of which you speak has already happened. Those of us who support Ron Paul are awake and those who don't support him or continue whining and complaining and harping on any of his shortcomings are asleep and might just as well support the puppets the establishment are grooming to shove down our throats. Too many of us forget that Ron Paul is human and humans sometimes make mistakes. I would rather he go down raising hell across the political spectrum, naming names, make all his work in the past worth while.
#17. To: ambi (#16)
Go way back to Lindbergh and McFadden. Both went well beyond anything Paul has ever tried. Lindbergh was shot at and forced out of politics. McFadden was poisoned, shot at and finally poisoned the second time for good. They went well beyond Ron Paul, paid the price but the American people learned nothing. Time difference? Yes, then we were not bankrupt, now we are all in and finished, still the people hear nothing, see nothing. Sometimes it takes a 2x4 along side the head to get their attention. The will wake up the day all of us will find we are broke and going to be put in irons.
#18. To: Cynicom, slags, bums, no counts, the crippled and infirmed (#15)
Is there anything new besides the introduction of shovel ready jobs in labor camps?
#19. To: Jethro Tull (#13)
I'm not sure. Kinda sounds like WWIII prep to me. What am I missing?
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#20. To: Jethro Tull, all (#18)
This is the first time I have seen anything quite that explicit. Also there is a one liner in there that puts the water resources of the country under the control of....SEC OF DEFENSE..... what in hell does that mean??? Is there anything new besides the introduction of shovel ready jobs in labor camps?
#21. To: Cynicom (#17)
I doubt they would wake up even then. Besides, we won't have to worry about being put in irons. A 9mm to the back of the head will be more cost effective and each of us will only need their special attention and love only once. The will wake up the day all of us will find we are broke and going to be put in irons.
#22. To: Jethro Tull (#18)
Jethro... I wrote about this a few days ago. When the order for all men to age 65 register for the draft during WW2 there was much hell to pay. It was not really for the military but gave them a list of who and what they were doing, and where....in case LABOR WAS NEEDED ELSEWHERE...
#23. To: Jethro Tull (#18)
Yes. Bammy is gonna unionize the military & use that to layer in a level of political control, or so it is rumored.
A people that would and could throw the bums out in the voting booth never has to. - Prefrontal Vortex
#24. To: Jethro Tull, Phant2000, Esso, randge (#18)
From Congressional Record of 1934... Here is naming names on House floor that got McFadden killed. "Congressional Record: June 15...1934 Congressman McFadden: "At that time a man named Jacob Schiff came to this country as the agent of certain foreign money lenders. His mission was to get control of American railroads. This man was a Jew. He was the son of a rabbi. He was born in one of the Rothschilds's houses in Frankfort, Germany."
#25. To: Cynicom (#24)
If more had the knowledge and recall of history that you do, Cyni, we would no doubt have a different opinion than we hold now. "At that time a man named Jacob Schiff came to this country as the agent of certain foreign money lenders. His mission was to get control of American railroads. This man was a Jew. He was the son of a rabbi. He was born in one of the Rothschilds's houses in Frankfort, Germany."
#26. To: Cynicom (#20)
what in hell does that mean??? That caught my eye as well. It is curious. Gotta watch those Friday night news dumps. Also there is a one liner in there that puts the water resources of the country under the control of....SEC OF DEFENSE.....
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#27. To: Esso (#26)
This is how FDR operated in the 1930s and Congress fell to their knees in total subjugation. Congress is spineless now and the Supreme Court is a toothless olde hag that needs to be put away.
#28. To: Phant2000 (#25)
McFadden named names, used the word Jew in an accusatory form and that was not allowed. Paul needs to take them to the wall with the few months he has left. Ron has NOTHING to lose, America would have much to gain.
#29. To: Esso, Jethro Tull, Phant2000 (#26)
This is statement defining water resources. Covers just about all sources. " "Water resources" means all usable water, from all sources, within the jurisdiction of the United States, that can be managed, controlled, and allocated to meet emergency requirements, except "water resources" does not include usable water that qualifies as "food resources." Re Def Dept in control of all water resources.
#30. To: Cynicom (#27)
I wasn't there, but this is what this new exec order brings to mind. On the surface, it looks like a runup to WWIII. If not, this still isn't a good thing. This is a massive power/control grab. The motive ist't real clear, yet... This is how FDR operated in the 1930s
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#31. To: Esso (#30)
FDR used an obscure...trading with the enemy act... from WW1 to steal the peoples gold. Congress lay down and rolled over. Common people had not a clue as to what or how it was being done, but there it was in writing, all nice and tidy like. This is a massive power/control grab
#32. To: Cynicom (#28)
Paul needs to take them to the wall with the few months he has left. Ron has NOTHING to lose, America would have much to gain. Again, you're asking a line drive hitter to be Babe Ruth. If we want a voice for these concerns, we need to get behind Dr. David Duke. He names names, and is always willing to collect $ to run for some political office. McFadden named names, used the word Jew in an accusatory form and that was not allowed.
#33. To: Jethro Tull (#32)
Jethro... Ron Paul IS RUNNING FOR THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY. Fold his tent and fade away????? Not my style. Paul has NATIONAL EXPOSURE and if he unloaded there would be someone that would carry it. If you read about McFadden, observers were always amazed that he had zero support in the House, none, zilch, nada. They all wanted their jobs and powers so badly that they ignored him. Same now, Paul has zero support, none. Again, you're asking a line drive hitter to be Babe Ruth
#34. To: Cynicom (#33)
Paul obviously doesn't have McFadden's temperament. In fact if he did, given the day and age we live in, he never would have been given the air time he received. We can still support Duke. I post all his 'tubes. He more closely reflects our political positions. Unfortunately he has more FBI "members" in his following than average, fed up Americans. Have you seen Traficant about?
#35. To: Jethro Tull (#34)
Have you seen Traficant about? Long ago I was considering joining JBirch society. Until I was scared off by a member. There were more government members than one could count. Unfortunately he has more FBI "members" in his following than average, fed up Americans.
#36. To: Cynicom (#35)
We called it the "Meet, eat and retreat" society. Teats on a bull.... JBirch society.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest