[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

JD Vance ENDS CNN Dana Bash’s Career LIVE on Air

Hell Let Loose - MOATS with George Galloway

Important Message: Our Country Our Choice

Israel is getting SLAUGHTERED in Lebanon, Americans are trapped | Redacted

Warren Buffett has said: “I could end the deficit in five minutes.

FBI seizes Diddy tape showing Hillary Clinton killing a child at a 'Freak Off' party

Numbers of dairy cow deaths from bird flu increasing to alarming rates

Elites Just Told Us How They'll SILENCE US!

Reese Report: The 2024 October Surprise?

Americans United in Crisis: Mules Carry Supplies to Neighbors Trapped by Hurricanes Devastation in NC

NC STATE POLICE WILL START ARRESTING FEDS THAT ARE BLOCKING AIDE FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES

France BANS ARMS SALES To Israel & Netanyahu LASHES OUT At Macron | Iran GETS READY

CNN Drops Bomb on Tim Walz, Releases Blistering Segment Over Big Scandals in His Own State

EU concerned it has no influence over Israel FT

How Israels invasion of Lebanon poses risks to Turkiye

Obama's New Home in Dubai?,

Vaccine Skeptics Need To Be Silenced! Bill Gates

Hillary Clinton: We Lose Total Control If Social Media Companies Dont Moderate Content

Cancer Patients Report Miraculous Recoveries from Ivermectin Treatment

Hurricane Aid Stolen By The State Of Tennessee?

The Pentagon requests $1.2bn to continue Red Sea mission

US security officials warn of potential threats within two weeks, ramped-up patrols.

Massive Flooding Coming From Hurricane Milton

How the UK is becoming a ‘third-world’ economy

What Would World War III Really Look Like? It's Already Starting...

The Roots Of The UK Implosion And Why War Is Inevitable

How The Jew Thinks

“In five years, scientists predict we will have the first ice-free Arctic summer" John Kerry in 2009

Jewish FEMA disaster relief handbook actually mandates prioritising non-Whites for disaster relief

A Comprehensive Guide To Choosing The Right Protein Powde


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Dana Loesch CUTS OFF Ron Paul Supporter For Sticking By Ron Paul
Source: youtube
URL Source: http://youtu.be/DSOT4DRtVhw
Published: Mar 25, 2012
Author: .
Post Date: 2012-03-25 15:13:30 by farmfriend
Keywords: None
Views: 426
Comments: 26


Poster Comment:

what a bitch!!!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: farmfriend (#0)

I've never heard of her, but she has a Wiki page and after reading it why would anyone be surprised? She's a neocon just like her late employer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana_Loesch

Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown

Jesus said, "Forgive them Father for they know not what they do. Evangelical Fundinuts say, "kill them all who will not bow down to the Zionist Jew." - F.A. Hayek Fan

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2012-03-25   15:21:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: farmfriend (#0)

I'm not voting for any globalist neo-libtard with an R either. Screw that traitorous biach!


My joy over McCain's defeat, is offset by my disappointment over hObama's victory.

hondo68  posted on  2012-03-25   15:24:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#1)

What people like her don't understand is that Ron Paul supporters know beyond a shadow of a doubt that electing Romney would be the same as electing Obama. The caller tried to explain that but she goes off.


changing the puppet does not change the play.

farmfriend  posted on  2012-03-25   15:25:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: hondo68 (#2)

I'm not voting for any globalist neo-libtard with an R either. Screw that traitorous biach!

Ditto. I think that is the case with most if not all Paul supporters.


changing the puppet does not change the play.

farmfriend  posted on  2012-03-25   15:26:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: farmfriend (#3)

What people like her don't understand is that Ron Paul supporters know beyond a shadow of a doubt that electing Romney would be the same as electing Obama. The caller tried to explain that but she goes off.

Piss on her. Just get satisfaction from the knowledge that Ron Paul supporters will get the last laugh when the Republicrats lose the election due to our unwillingness to vote for a Bush-Obama clone.

Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown

Jesus said, "Forgive them Father for they know not what they do. Evangelical Fundinuts say, "kill them all who will not bow down to the Zionist Jew." - F.A. Hayek Fan

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2012-03-25   15:31:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: hondo68, F.A. Hayek Fan (#2)

I saw an interview with Limbaugh yesterday that had been filmed in Dec 2011. Weird listening to him after so many years. Anyway, I found what he had to say about Republican establishment leadership interesting. He was right on the money, just weird seeing it come from him.


changing the puppet does not change the play.

farmfriend  posted on  2012-03-25   15:31:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#5)

Ron Paul supporters will get the last laugh when the Republicrats lose the election due to our unwillingness to vote for a Bush-Obama clone.

The election had been preordained for some time now. It gets more obvious each election.


changing the puppet does not change the play.

farmfriend  posted on  2012-03-25   15:33:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: farmfriend (#6)

He was right on the money

He'll fold like a cheap suit when the time comes. He's an Obama shill pushing the loser Romney. Four more year of whining about "evil Dems" is what he wants.

They figure by then we'll be desperate enough to vote for Jeb Bush, or equivalent.


My joy over McCain's defeat, is offset by my disappointment over hObama's victory.

hondo68  posted on  2012-03-25   15:40:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: hondo68 (#8)

No doubt you are right. I certainly wouldn't vote against you on this one.


changing the puppet does not change the play.

farmfriend  posted on  2012-03-25   15:43:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: farmfriend (#7)

The election had been preordained for some time now.

Thank you.

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)

Esso  posted on  2012-03-25   16:44:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: farmfriend (#0)

what a bitch!!!

Couldn't have said it better.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.    Lord Acton

The human herd stampedes on the fields of facts and the valleys of truth to get to the desert of ignorance. Saman Mohammadi

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would promise them missionaries for dinner." Mencken

"..if the military is going to defend our freedoms, then we need freedoms to defend. Our freedoms must be restored before the military can defend them..."  Lawrence M. Vance

Você me trata desse jeito só porque eu sou preto. Junior (my youngest son)

James Deffenbach  posted on  2012-03-25   17:24:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: farmfriend (#4)

Will Paul support Romney publicly????

Cynicom  posted on  2012-03-25   17:26:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: farmfriend (#0)

Wow. It's that kind of arrogance that would give me a small bit of satisfaction in seeing the R nominee, if it's not Ron Paul, be defeated by Obama. Just knowing that it would piss of people like her.

Though I'm sure I'd be similarly satisfied at seeing her counterparts on the D side get P/O'd if Obama goes down.

But then again, that's the same game that's always been going on for decades now. R vs D, flag wavers everyone of them.

Pinguinite  posted on  2012-03-25   17:42:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Cynicom (#12)

Will Paul support Romney publicly????

I would say there's zero chance of that, with the possible impossibility that Romney would choose Paul as a VP running mate. Endorsing Romney would go against everything he's said and done for 30 years or more.

Pinguinite  posted on  2012-03-25   17:45:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Pinguinite (#13)

But then again, that's the same game that's always been going on for decades now.

Correct, I have seen 8 of them.

Eighty million and increasing, AMERICANS that do not vote.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-03-25   17:46:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Cynicom (#12)

Will Paul support Romney publicly????

No, he will not.

" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11

"Life's tough, and even tougher if you're stupid." --John Wayne

abraxas  posted on  2012-03-25   17:51:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Cynicom (#12)

Will Paul support Romney publicly????

He might though I don't remember him supporting McLame.


changing the puppet does not change the play.

farmfriend  posted on  2012-03-25   17:59:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Cynicom (#12)

Will Paul support Romney publicly????

If he does, it will confirm my worst suspicions of RP.

I like what he says, but his most current actions will tip the balance.

Buzzard  posted on  2012-03-25   21:26:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Buzzard (#18)

I like what he says, but his most current actions will tip the balance.

I suspect Paul would PREFER to hang on until the convention is over.

However money is becoming a problem as more and more of his supporters sense that Paul will knuckle under and go with the republican party and Romney.

He dropped out four years ago and left us adrift.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-03-26   9:18:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#5) (Edited)

Ron Paul supporters will get the last laugh when the Republicrats lose the election due to our unwillingness to vote for a Bush- Obama clone.

Ron Paul's candidacy gives the Republican Party the opportunity to recover from all of the damage done to it by Neocon goons like Loesch. Not our fault if Republicans lose the election by not supporting Ron Paul, the only real Conservative and Defender of the Constitution. It would be the Neocons' fault.

Edited to reword.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-03-27   4:03:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Cynicom (#19) (Edited)

He dropped out four years ago and left us adrift.

You keep accusing him of that and I keep wondering why you do.

Republican Party presidential primaries, 2008 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Republican Party presidential candidates, 2008 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On March 4, 2008, John McCain became the Republican presumptive presidential nominee when he obtained the 1,191 delegates necessary to receive the party's nomination.[2] Mike Huckabee announced his withdrawal from the race later in the evening.[3] McCain's last remaining competitor in the race, Ron Paul, [Edit: withdrew suspended his campaign] on June 12, 2008.[4]...He did not endorse John McCain as the presumptive nominee for President - Paul eventually went on to endorse Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party.[20]

On June 3, 2008, the last States voted -- South Dakota and New Mexico -- and McCain then had 1,575 Estimated Delegates.

Ron Paul's Campaign Status: Suspended June 12, 2008; 9 days later -- not withdrawn, just suspended. He had 14 Pledged Delegates and 35 Estimated Delegates, with his endorsement for the Constitution Party -- not for McCain.

I don't know what else you expected from Ron Paul. Please explain.

Edited to reword next to last sentence.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-03-27   4:49:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: GreyLmist (#21)

You keep accusing

Someone cannot be accused of a factual event of their own making.

Ron Paul has been consistent for many years, elected 12 times, as a republican.

Personally, it is my position that there is but one party.

Pauls chances of being elected President in 2008 and now, were and are zero... AS A REPUBLICAN.

I can understand ones thinking about my position, if they truly believe there are two distinct parties.

Between now and November, Paul must make a decision, when that time arrives, we will all have our answer as to his intentions four years ago and now.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-03-27   8:38:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Cynicom (#22)

You keep accusing

Someone cannot be accused of a factual event of their own making.

He did not drop out of the race four years ago or leave us adrift. I still voted for him in my State, even though his campaign was suspended -- not ended. I read the so-called "Trotsky Memo", so what is it you wanted him to do? Never trim down his campaign staff anywhere the voting was over to save on expenses when, as he said, the chances of a brokered convention were nearly zero by then? Did you want him to refund whatever was left of his campaign contributions if he couldn't win the nomination? Could he still have launched a third party run after not dropping out of the Republican race until all of the voting was completed in June? If so, could he have won the Presidency as a third party candidate with so little time left before the Nov. election, since he didn't have unlimited funds on hand to go that route? At what point would you have wanted him to drop out of the race and try to run third party, after taking your donations to run as a Republican? Had he done that, might some other contributors have felt tricked into financially supporting another Party that they didn't want to back? Should he never have decided to refocus his efforts and run for TX Congressman to keep his seat in D.C., just retired from politics four years ago? Why disparage him for not getting enough Delegates or not going third party even if he couldn't realistically win that way? He put what was left of his campign resources to good use and established the Campaign for Liberty project to continue furthering Constitutional Education. He also arranged for his supporters to have their own Convention. I'd like to see him start his own party of Jeffersonian Republicans to distinguish us from the infestation of Neocons. Wouldn't you?

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-03-27   10:31:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: GreyLmist (#23)

He did not drop out of the race four years ago or leave us adrift.

I thought his Trotski memo was rather clear about his intentions of remaining a republican for life.

He is a man of his word and I accepted that.

To further research on Paul, in the background you will find for several years, that among conservatives, speculation abounds that Paul may indeed be a "ringer", an active part of the system.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-03-27   16:49:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Cynicom (#24)

I thought his Trotski memo was rather clear about his intentions of remaining a republican for life.

He is a man of his word and I accepted that.

To further research on Paul, in the background you will find for several years, that among conservatives, speculation abounds that Paul may indeed be a "ringer", an active part of the system.

He has lots of detractors but I think you're reading more into his statement about remaining a Republican than is actually there. It does not say "for life" or "forever". He had to run two elections then because the Presidential nomination was going to McCain. Switching parties would probably not effectively have won the Presidency and could have cost him his Congressional seat:

4um: Ron Paul's Goodbye (Jeff Rense)

Let me tell you my thoughts. With Romney gone, the chances of a brokered convention are nearly zero. But that does not affect my determination to fight on, in every caucus and primary remaining, and at the convention for our ideas, with just as many delegates as I can get. But with so many primaries and caucuses now over, we do not now need so big a national campaign staff, and so I am making it leaner and tighter. Of course, I am committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican party, so there will be no third party run. I do not denigrate third parties -- just the opposite, and I have long worked to remove the ballot-access restrictions on them. But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican. I also have another priority. I have constituents in my home district that I must serve. I cannot and will not let them down. And I have another battle I must face here as well. If I were to lose the primary for my congressional seat, all our opponents would react with glee, and pretend it was a rejection of our ideas. I cannot and will not let that happen.In the presidential race and the congressional race, I need your support, as always. And I have plans to continue fighting for our ideas in politics and education that I will share with you when I can, for I will need you at my side. In the meantime, onward and upward! The neocons, the warmongers, the socialists, the advocates of inflation will be hearing much from you and me.

The situation now is different than '08. Chances are better this time that a third party run can work and he doesn't have to remain a Republican to be more competitive for another Congressional contest. This election has shown that the Republican Party is rigged against him and, no matter what he does, there's no guarantee that it wouldn't be rigged against a run by his son too, especially if he plans to retire from office before then. He could form his own Jeffersonian-Republican Wing and greatly improve his chances for the Presidency -- as well as Rand's eventually, if he also decided to leave the Neocon-rigged farce that the GOP has become. I think many Republicans, Teapartiers, and others -- even some Democrats -- would be glad if Ron Paul established something more Constitutionally principled as a Conservative Party option.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-03-29   13:24:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: GreyLmist (#25)

"Of course, I am committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican party, so there will be no third party run."

I accepted him at his word, very short, candid, and without any exception.

I immediately stopped contributing and have not done so this time around.

I am willing to wait and see what he will do, he has three options.

Go third party.

Support the candidate publicly and forcefully.

Remain silent, do nothing.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-03-29   21:33:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]