Title: Broken News Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Apr 2, 2012 Author:- Post Date:2012-04-02 23:50:21 by Eric Stratton Keywords:None Views:147 Comments:3
Poster Comment:
Someone here posted this.
Starting at the 20:15 mark, is that Bldg. 7 in the middle of the screen?
I think it is. If so, then I'm wondering why they had absolutely no footage of it collapsing from that angle?
Obviously the reason would be that it would be too obvious. In fact, there probably was some, so where is it!
Then again at 27:40, one can plainly see the nose cone coming out the other side, but where did it go? It had momentum, yet what, disintegrated in some fire? Sure.
BTW, otherwise I'm not sure this is worthy of watching since it's really nothing new to us here.
Starting at the 20:15 mark, is that Bldg. 7 in the middle of the screen?
I think it is.
I think it is too and no fire or smoke is seen from that side of WTC 7, not in the Jane Standley footage starting at 23:15 or when it collapses starting at 24:08. At 30:48-31:06, a video clip starts moving into view and it seems to be a still photo with the smoke on the left of WTC 7 not moving, then a puff of smoke flashes up to the right of it. In the Channel 9 clip next, it looks like smoke starts rising up from the ground in front of WTC 7. These are examples of why the smoke analysis investigation was and is important and should be restarted.
nothing new to us here
At 26:52-27:40, news video is shown of burnt and crushed vehicles. That might be new to some people, as well as the Pentagon footage at 19:31 and the Shanksville footage at 21:43.