See other Editorial Articles
Title: Pakistani Lawyer Representing Victims of Drone Strikes Prevented From Speaking in U.S.
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 11, 2012
Author: a
Post Date: 2012-04-11 08:59:03 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 105
Comments: 1
Pakistani Lawyer Representing Victims of Drone Strikes Prevented From Speaking in U.S. Center for Constitutional Rights 9-drone-strikes-da-.jpg The body of an eight-year-old boy killed by a missile strike in Makeen, South Waziristan, Pakistan, in a photo taken on Feb. 14, 2009. April 9, 2012 Pakistani lawyer Shahzad Akbar has been invited to speak at an International Drone Summit in Washington DC on April 28, but the U.S. government is failing to grant him a visa. The Summit is organized by the peace group CODEPINK and the legal advocacy organizations Reprieve and the Center for Constitutional Rights. Akbar, co-founder of the Pakistani human rights organization Foundation for Fundamental Rights, is important to the Summit because of his work providing legal aid to victims of CIA-operated drone strikes. Akbar filed the first case in Pakistan on behalf of family members of civilian victims and has been a critical force in litigating and advocating on victims' behalf. While Akbar has traveled to the United States in the past, he has not been granted permission to return since becoming an outspoken critic of drone attacks in Pakistan that have killed hundreds of civilians. He was previously invited to speak about drone strikes at Columbia University in New York, but he never received a response to the visa application he filed in May 2011. One year later, he is still waiting for a response, and he has been unable to get an answer from the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad as to why his application is being held up. "Denying a visa to people like me is denying Americans their right to know what the U.S. government and its intelligence community are doing to children, women and other civilians in this part of the world," Akbar said. "The CIA, which operates the drones in Pakistan, does not want anyone challenging their killing spree. But the American people should have the right to know." The CIA’s secret drone program has killed hundreds of people in Pakistan with no due process and no accountability. Akbar represents families whose innocent loved ones have been killed and maimed in these drone attacks. "Shahzad is the voice for these poor tribal people who have had no recourse," said CODEPINK co-director Medea Benjamin. "It’s outrageous that our government is trying to keep him from speaking at the Drone Summit." "The Obama administration has already launched six times as many drone strikes as the Bush administration in Pakistan alone, killing hundreds of innocent people and devastating families," said Leili Kashani, Advocacy Program Manager at the Center for Constitutional Rights. "By refusing to grant Shahzad Akbar a visa to speak about this abhorrent reality in the United States, the Obama administration is further silencing discussion about the impact of its targeted killing program on people in Pakistan and around the world." The Drone Summit’s organizers vow to keep pressuring the U.S. government to grant Akbar a visa. In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. government has increasingly deployed unmanned drones in the Middle East, South Asia and Africa. While drones were initially primarily used by the U.S. military and CIA for surveillance, these remotely controlled aerial vehicles are currently routinely used to launch missiles against human targets in countries where the United States is not at war, including Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen. As many as 3,000 people, including hundreds of civilians and even American citizens, have been killed in such covert missions.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
All- Are you guys aware that the US is at war in Yemeni? Something like 200 drone strikes with hundreds murdered? And we have boots on the ground there.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" 
The people of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage." J.K. Galbraith
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest