By now many of you are familiar with the brutal racially motivated mob attack on two Virginia-Pilot reporters in Norfolk, Virgina. The pair was attacked by a mob of up to thirty young blacks down the street from the offices of the Virginia-Pilot.
The newspaper news staff refused to report the story. Two weeks later, a writer for the opinion page blew the whistle on her own newspapers' censorship. She also reported on a twitter message from one of the perps. The message boasted that the attack was revenge for Trayvon Martin. She said the police had been reluctant to do anything about the attack.
However, media censorship of black crime continues unabated. Over the weekend, the Red Hot Chili Peppers performed at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey. About 20,000 fans packed the arena.
Sounds like the attacks were racially motivated hate crimes right? Well the Newark Star-Ledger only describes the attackers as "teenagers." Any details that would clue the reader as too the race of the attackers appears to be intentionally omitted.
I called the Star-Ledger and asked if they had a policy of omitting the race of at large crime suspects. The first woman I talked to went to ask her superiors. She came back and told me that there is no formal policy, "but we generally do not publish race."
I then asked to speak to crime reporter James Queally who wrote Star-Ledgers' two articles on the attacks.
Queally told me that the police report did list the race of the perpetrators and that he censored this information in his two articles on purpose. He also stated that it was the newspapers' policy to censor race in crime stories.
Then the conversation took a comedic turn. I asked Queally what race was listed in the police report and he refused to tell me. He also said he interviewed three of the victims, but refused to tell me what race they were. Queally did however volunteer that "it's an 80% black area and the concert was full of white rock and roll fans."
Queally denied that the attacks were racially motivated. He said that if it was blacks attacking whites, then that was just a factor of probability. Keep in mind that Queally admits knowing the race of the perps and refuses to say.
I told Queally about numerous other black on white mob attacks all over the nation and explained to him this was part of a trend of racially motivated hate crimes. At this point Queally went from a friendly demeanor to a very arrogant sounding tone. He replied "well somehow myself and everyone else in the media have missed all of these." I told Queally I have been documenting these hate crime mob attacks and would be happy to e-mail him lots of information. Queally then hung up the phone without a reply.
During the conversation Queally hinted at his reasoning for wanting to censor the race of the perpetrators. He asked "if all the attackers were black fifteen year-olds, would you avoid all black fifteen year-olds in Newark?" I told him I would, especially a group of black fifteen year-olds. I told him that avoiding a specific demographic known for brutally attacking my demographic at random was "common sense." Queally replied, "that's your opinion."
Recently I called WYFF Greenville, an NBC affiliate. I found two articles on their website about attempted burglaries, where a home owner scared the suspect off. One of the stories has detailed information about the perps' clothing, but omits his race. The other story lists the perp as white. I asked why one was censored and not the other. The woman who answers their main phone said that employees of the studio have staff meetings and decide which stories to censor race and which ones not to censor race. She said she wouldn't characterize it as "censorship," but as "making a decision."
She said she didn't know why race would be stated in one attempted burglary story and not the other. I think it is pretty self-evident.
My conversation with Queally reminded me of a funny comedy bit by comedian Patrice O'Neal. He lampooned the agony that a white liberal must feel when they see a dangerous looking black male coming down the street. He said they want to flee, but are afraid of being "racist." His advice was to run away and be safe, and feel guilty later.
I recently had a black man from Columbus, Ohio tell me about being mugged by two young black perps. He said he suspected the men were dangerous and could have gotten away in time. He didn't take evasive action because he decided that he shouldn't "racially profile." He felt pretty foolish afterward.
Even left-wing icon Rev. Jessie Jackson believes race is a very important piece of information to know when it comes to crime. At a 1993 conference for the Rainbow/PUSH coalition in Chicago, Jessie Jackson said "There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved…. After all we have been through. Just to think we can’t walk down our own streets, how humiliating."
A group of three young men is seen walking ahead of the soldier. Police say one of the men in the group doubled back and asked to soldier to borrow a dollar. When the soldier reached for his wallet, the first punch flew
Mostly I find it sad. On a number of levels. There is seething sea of repressed rage and raw unreasoning hatred roiling about in the black underclass. However, I look at it and ask: Why?
If one eliminates Darwinistic Matierialism as a cause then you have to look for other factors that figure into the equation.
First we can just observe the obvious. These types of violent animalistic attacks are not being perpetrated by ALL blacks but just a subset. Uniformly, and correct me if I am wrong, these acts are being committed primarily by black teen males, largely in the underclass of professional mendicants subsisting on government assistance, raised in largely, if not exclusively, in black ghettoes, where the rot festers and feeds on itself. Throw in that the subject population in question is subjected to a variety of negative cultural influences - Rap Music, Tee Bee, and group agreements which act as an incubator for this violence.
We can also observe who are not committing these types of crimes e.g., educated blacks in the working and lower middle class.
So, superficially it first appears as a matter of race since the perpetrators are almost 100% black. Yet, that is a superficial analysis since we can see that there are other factors driving the rage which drives the violence and they are:
Ignorance (you do not find this kind of behavior among well educated blacks). Conversely most of those who commit these kinds of crimes are semi-literate or outright illiterate (this is backed up by studies done on prison populations which have consistently found that prison inmates rank in the bottom of the literacy scale). This is fueled further by a culture, in the ghetto, that treats trying to become educated as "actin' white" and is discouraged by a savage groupthink that punishes those trying to rise from ignorance.
Poverty (you do not, largely, find this kind of behavior among blacks who are earning a decent living).
Culture: Segregated, whether by law or simply de facto by economic circumstance, a culture has developed (since the 1960's) which is one of increasing dependence on government subsidy via welfare in its different facets of cash, food, and shelter, and has created a culture of family dysfunction. Marriage is punished economically by making it harder to get welfare and in turn the ease of getting welfare by unwed mothers discourages marriage by rewarding the negative behavior. Black males brag about the numbers of little bastards they've created while black females grow up wanting their own welfare check and see having a baby out of wedlock as a meal ticket. And in crushing poverty many young black males see crime as their only source of income.
Prejudice: This cannot be ignored even though it is not the only driver in the situation. However, prejudice based on skin color alone drives many of the other ills which create the stew which creates the cauldron of violence.
I could go on with the analysis quite a bit further, but my point really is that race is the seeming characteristic common to these crimes and so it is, but that does not mean that race, as in genetics, is what creates the situation which creates the violence. To fall into the trap of thinking it is based on a deterministic cause of racial type alone is to fall into the trap of analyzing the situation based only on a few facts gleaned from the surface apparency of the problem.
That also should not be presumed to imply that I think the little thugs should be coddled or allowed to get away with it either. I don't give a damn what stew they come from when they violate the rights of another then they in turn have earned their comeuppance.
However, a real solution in the long run has to address the causes of the culture which promotes the violent behavior.
I see all three of your brain cells are misfiring again. I was waiting for the bigoted half thought out partially baked response from you. Congratulations.
Of course it does nothing to address my post - beyond assuming something I didn't state, but then again you've seldom been known for your reading comprehension.
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
IOW you just babble on and on about how bad niggers have it and how its not their fault etc.
IOW you just babble on and on about how bad niggers have it and how its not their fault etc.
Once again your reading deficiency shines through.
That is not what I said. Try reading for comprehension. You might find it a refreshing change. Get a dictionary and see if it helps. You know what that is? I hope. In all seriousness it is a great tool. I use it all the time.
However, at no point did I excuse the behavior. I am however trying to understand WHY?
The correct "WHY" opens the door to a handling. As long as incorrect "WHYs" are used the problem will not resolve.
Generalizations do not solve problems. Specifics do. And the most important of those specifics is "why?".
Why, from what motivations, are these kids doing this and behaving this way? That is what influences are at work provoking these actions and behaviors? I've given you some of them. I could just say it is irrational behavior but while it is true that also is a generalization that does not get to the root of the problem.
Just blindly shouting "nigger" and acting like that is an answer is the response of a complete microencephalopath.
You still haven't addressed the post topic, which is censorship.
You ask "why?"
There is no "why".
Why do dogs bark? Because dogs bark. That's why.
Why are niggers violent? Because they are niggers. It's the same here and in the mudderland. YOu say there are exceptions? Yep. There are exceptions. They are known as "magic niggers", and they are just that: exceptions. But they are not needed. We can do just fine without them.
But again, the topic is censorship. Why hide their race? It's not white kids doing this. Not even poor white kids. So much for your idiotic poverty argument.
You still haven't addressed the post topic, which is censorship.
Okay, for the record I oppose censorship in any form.
Omitting important data is a form of censorship.
Therefore I oppose censoring out race simply because it is an important data point.
However, I was responding to someone else's post related to the thread. If you want to be "Thread Nazi" go ahead. You've mastered it in other respects so you might as well get some use of it however invalid.
Okay, for the record I oppose censorship in any form.
Good boy! A gold star for you.
Now, why aren't poor white kids doing this?
A better question is why aren't wiggers doing this? They love the nigger culture. And because they actually have a choice, wiggers are even lower than niggers. But for some reason not even the poor wiggers aren't out there attacking people.
These articles leave people with the impression that whites are doing this. They're not.
Again the never ending delights of your charmingly piquant simplicity shines as a Super Nova of darkness.
Why aren't they?
Why don't black kids build Hot Rods?
The key word is culture.
From the Oxford American Dictionary:
culture |ÈkYl ch Yr| noun
1 the arts and other manifestations of human intellectual achievement regarded collectively : 20th century popular culture. • a refined understanding or appreciation of this : men of culture. • the customs, arts, social institutions, and achievements of a particular nation, people, or other social group : Caribbean culture | people from many different cultures. • [with adj. ] the attitudes and behavior characteristic of a particular social group : the emerging drug culture.
I'm afraid I don't have the months or years to spare at the moment to try and walk you through this and relieve your complete, total, and abysmal ignorance.
The simple answer is that most, not all, white kids grow up in a completely different culture with a different set of traditions and history.
Your question is almost akin to asking: "Why were Apaches such great horsemen and other tribes were not?"
I probably wouldn't pick on you so much if you were simply not so annoyingly smug in your "know it all" ignorance.
I don't have all the answers and I do not pretend to have them, but I do try to understand the wellspring from which the problem has erupted without trying to preach hatred and bile as a solution.
• the customs, arts, social institutions, and achievements of a particular nation, people, or other social group :
Maybe you should not have posted the entire definition, huh?
Of course they are being generous and they call them "people", but for the sake of argument I will let that slide...
The simple answer is that most, not all, white kids grow up in a completely different culture with a different set of traditions and history.
Which wiggers abandon in favor of nog "culture". But still they aren't out there flash mobbing attacking innocent humans. Neither are poor whites. Neither are asians or mexicans.
Perhaps our cultures are superior? Is that it??? You use the word "different", but is it superiority that you just admitted? Is that the "different" white culture you babble on about? lol because it sure seems like this is what you're admitting. White culture is superior. Say it with me. White... culture... is... superior.
jewsus farkin cripes you think you're so smart. You're not.
Chinese Culture is superior - after all it gave us Confucius, Lao Tse, Sun Tzu, and on and on.
Repeat after me:
Indian culture is superior - after all it gave Buddha, The Upanishads, and a written history of culture that was advanced when your European ancestors were wearing poorly tanned hides and scratching flea bites as bathing was unfashionable.
You lack the perspective that some passing knowledge of history gives.
As I have said before you are ignorant. Ignorant as in lacking knowledge and the perspective it gives with no negative necessarily implied.
Chinese Culture is superior - after all it gave us Confucius, Lao Tse, Sun Tzu, and on and on.
Superior for them. They have a right to be proud because of their accomplishments.
Same for the Indian culture(s) both feather and dot.
I take nothing away from them.
What have the nogs ever accomplished? I mean except waiting for handouts and destroying what they touch. They are damn good at that.
White culture has it's problems. It's not even close to being perfect. One such problem is caring more for other cultures than they care for their own.
if white culture is unable to come up with a philosphy that preserves its habitat instead of destroying it, then we have to admit that white culture is inferior from a survival/evolutionary standpoint.
you seem to be unable to admit that... and while i admire certain aspects of your mind, i think that it's flawed when it comes to this race business.
that flaw, if applied globally, will eventually be fatal for humanity.
Who exactly is destroying it? All we're seeing now are the fruits of diversity due to white gullibility.
A primitive stone age culture, with primitive intelligence, with primitive emotions, with the resultant lack of control, cannot thrive within an advanced culture. It doesn't matter what is done to try and bring them up to our level. They can only exist as slaves.
The best thing we can do for them and us is to send them back where they belong. But not too many whites would go for that, because that would be racist... Instead, we face a race war.
For this, I fault whites, because in general they are herd creatures that care more for being PC and being acceptable to others, more than anything. If that wasn't the case, we wouldn't be in the mess we are in right now.
They don't have the balls to go against the grain when the situation calls for going against the grain.
If things go the way I think they will go, it will be a bloodbath for whites, because they are not mean enough. They are too compliant. It won't be a walk in the park. The weak will die. Good riddance.
...the most sophisticated and destructive parasites in history...
too goddamned bad that, once they kill off their host planet, it's the end of the road.
you're unable to grasp that fact, and that's the flaw in your thinking...
it's a common problem, i guess... your emotion is overuling your intellect, and that's why the peak oil and global warming denial projects are so successful...
people dont want to believe the truth, so they dont... although i suspect that deep down, more people know the truth than will admit to it.
There are all kinds of destructive parasites. I will not excuse one group of parasites in order to force concentration on other parasites.
They're all in on it. They are all destructive. They need to go, one way or the other.
They're only parasites because they are here, and because the host is so willing. Their destructiveness is just so much more obvious than other parasites to everyday observation. It's as close as your nearest nigger neighborhood.
are you fighting because blacks are the weakest available victims?
Please stop with the pablum. Blacks, circa 2102, are a protected minority who have been granted spacial rights and privileges, above those of Whites, from the FedGov. To miss this is to miss the nose on your face.
guilt has nothing to do with it... it's just a matter of common sense.
whites went down the wrong path.
none of you white supremacists can admit that, and there seems to be lots of you... enough of you that you'll be successful in stirring up your race wars.
judging from the weakness of your posts, we have to assume that you know whites went down the wrong path, but you're unable to admit it, you're unable to say why you hate black people, and you're unable to come up with constructive solutions.
none of this namecalling can obscure the fact that whites have fucked things up.
their whole system is now dependent on exploiting dwindling resources, and of course the solution to that, from a traditional white philosophical standpoint, is kill people so you can control their energy resources, and deprive rivals of access to those resources.
nevermind that our prime rival had to industrialize and cause horrendous pollution so they could protect themselves from us.
and nevermind that we're putting all those combustion products back in the atmosphere, and the planet is warming up.
nevermind that we're wrecking jillions of square miles of productive land by paving the land, nevermind that the waste products of a consumer society, and the process of manufacturing consumer goods, is wrecking more land.
but if you resort to namecalling on internet forums, everything will be okay forever'n'ever, amen.
and finally, we got to admit that if whites are unable to admit their mistakes and reform their behavior, they might, like the israelis, wind up destroying themselves in defense of a bad idea.
it's a sign of maturity, to admit your mistakes, and try to correct them.