By now many of you are familiar with the brutal racially motivated mob attack on two Virginia-Pilot reporters in Norfolk, Virgina. The pair was attacked by a mob of up to thirty young blacks down the street from the offices of the Virginia-Pilot.
The newspaper news staff refused to report the story. Two weeks later, a writer for the opinion page blew the whistle on her own newspapers' censorship. She also reported on a twitter message from one of the perps. The message boasted that the attack was revenge for Trayvon Martin. She said the police had been reluctant to do anything about the attack.
However, media censorship of black crime continues unabated. Over the weekend, the Red Hot Chili Peppers performed at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey. About 20,000 fans packed the arena.
Sounds like the attacks were racially motivated hate crimes right? Well the Newark Star-Ledger only describes the attackers as "teenagers." Any details that would clue the reader as too the race of the attackers appears to be intentionally omitted.
I called the Star-Ledger and asked if they had a policy of omitting the race of at large crime suspects. The first woman I talked to went to ask her superiors. She came back and told me that there is no formal policy, "but we generally do not publish race."
I then asked to speak to crime reporter James Queally who wrote Star-Ledgers' two articles on the attacks.
Queally told me that the police report did list the race of the perpetrators and that he censored this information in his two articles on purpose. He also stated that it was the newspapers' policy to censor race in crime stories.
Then the conversation took a comedic turn. I asked Queally what race was listed in the police report and he refused to tell me. He also said he interviewed three of the victims, but refused to tell me what race they were. Queally did however volunteer that "it's an 80% black area and the concert was full of white rock and roll fans."
Queally denied that the attacks were racially motivated. He said that if it was blacks attacking whites, then that was just a factor of probability. Keep in mind that Queally admits knowing the race of the perps and refuses to say.
I told Queally about numerous other black on white mob attacks all over the nation and explained to him this was part of a trend of racially motivated hate crimes. At this point Queally went from a friendly demeanor to a very arrogant sounding tone. He replied "well somehow myself and everyone else in the media have missed all of these." I told Queally I have been documenting these hate crime mob attacks and would be happy to e-mail him lots of information. Queally then hung up the phone without a reply.
During the conversation Queally hinted at his reasoning for wanting to censor the race of the perpetrators. He asked "if all the attackers were black fifteen year-olds, would you avoid all black fifteen year-olds in Newark?" I told him I would, especially a group of black fifteen year-olds. I told him that avoiding a specific demographic known for brutally attacking my demographic at random was "common sense." Queally replied, "that's your opinion."
Recently I called WYFF Greenville, an NBC affiliate. I found two articles on their website about attempted burglaries, where a home owner scared the suspect off. One of the stories has detailed information about the perps' clothing, but omits his race. The other story lists the perp as white. I asked why one was censored and not the other. The woman who answers their main phone said that employees of the studio have staff meetings and decide which stories to censor race and which ones not to censor race. She said she wouldn't characterize it as "censorship," but as "making a decision."
She said she didn't know why race would be stated in one attempted burglary story and not the other. I think it is pretty self-evident.
My conversation with Queally reminded me of a funny comedy bit by comedian Patrice O'Neal. He lampooned the agony that a white liberal must feel when they see a dangerous looking black male coming down the street. He said they want to flee, but are afraid of being "racist." His advice was to run away and be safe, and feel guilty later.
I recently had a black man from Columbus, Ohio tell me about being mugged by two young black perps. He said he suspected the men were dangerous and could have gotten away in time. He didn't take evasive action because he decided that he shouldn't "racially profile." He felt pretty foolish afterward.
Even left-wing icon Rev. Jessie Jackson believes race is a very important piece of information to know when it comes to crime. At a 1993 conference for the Rainbow/PUSH coalition in Chicago, Jessie Jackson said "There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved…. After all we have been through. Just to think we can’t walk down our own streets, how humiliating."
Chinese Culture is superior - after all it gave us Confucius, Lao Tse, Sun Tzu, and on and on.
Repeat after me:
Indian culture is superior - after all it gave Buddha, The Upanishads, and a written history of culture that was advanced when your European ancestors were wearing poorly tanned hides and scratching flea bites as bathing was unfashionable.
You lack the perspective that some passing knowledge of history gives.
As I have said before you are ignorant. Ignorant as in lacking knowledge and the perspective it gives with no negative necessarily implied.
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha
The ancient Greeks were a Bronze Age culture and yet they gave birth to such as Homer.
Name a comparable nigger philosopher.
I have no problem with native americans, or ME cultures (with one notable exception), or any other cultures.
But you're comparing apples and bananas.
Hell, I don't even hate nogs, really. What I hate is that they are here, they are parasites, and they are destroying this country one city block at a time. If they were in africa somewhere, I couldn't care less about them. They can hack each other with machetes all day long if they wanted. Just keep it out of here. Their "culture" is not compatible with ours.
------------------------------------------
"Those who believe the Bible are those who know the least about it".
This would make for a fine academic exercise, but given that Whites are now facing a spear tip that has been honed over decades, the time for such study isn't now. The brigands are at the gate. The man who was assaulted in this article should have been armed and dispatched his assailants post haste. When enough Whites defend themselves then perhaps the assaults will slow and we can then study further why such behavior exists. As for me, I think Professor MacDonald explains the "why" very well. I posted a 'tube this AM in another thread that is well worth watching.
Chinese Culture is superior - after all it gave us Confucius, Lao Tse, Sun Tzu, and on and on.
Superior for them. They have a right to be proud because of their accomplishments.
Same for the Indian culture(s) both feather and dot.
I take nothing away from them.
What have the nogs ever accomplished? I mean except waiting for handouts and destroying what they touch. They are damn good at that.
White culture has it's problems. It's not even close to being perfect. One such problem is caring more for other cultures than they care for their own.
------------------------------------------
"Those who believe the Bible are those who know the least about it".
if white culture is unable to come up with a philosphy that preserves its habitat instead of destroying it, then we have to admit that white culture is inferior from a survival/evolutionary standpoint.
you seem to be unable to admit that... and while i admire certain aspects of your mind, i think that it's flawed when it comes to this race business.
that flaw, if applied globally, will eventually be fatal for humanity.
Who exactly is destroying it? All we're seeing now are the fruits of diversity due to white gullibility.
A primitive stone age culture, with primitive intelligence, with primitive emotions, with the resultant lack of control, cannot thrive within an advanced culture. It doesn't matter what is done to try and bring them up to our level. They can only exist as slaves.
The best thing we can do for them and us is to send them back where they belong. But not too many whites would go for that, because that would be racist... Instead, we face a race war.
For this, I fault whites, because in general they are herd creatures that care more for being PC and being acceptable to others, more than anything. If that wasn't the case, we wouldn't be in the mess we are in right now.
They don't have the balls to go against the grain when the situation calls for going against the grain.
If things go the way I think they will go, it will be a bloodbath for whites, because they are not mean enough. They are too compliant. It won't be a walk in the park. The weak will die. Good riddance.
------------------------------------------
"Those who believe the Bible are those who know the least about it".
...the most sophisticated and destructive parasites in history...
too goddamned bad that, once they kill off their host planet, it's the end of the road.
you're unable to grasp that fact, and that's the flaw in your thinking...
it's a common problem, i guess... your emotion is overuling your intellect, and that's why the peak oil and global warming denial projects are so successful...
people dont want to believe the truth, so they dont... although i suspect that deep down, more people know the truth than will admit to it.
There are all kinds of destructive parasites. I will not excuse one group of parasites in order to force concentration on other parasites.
They're all in on it. They are all destructive. They need to go, one way or the other.
They're only parasites because they are here, and because the host is so willing. Their destructiveness is just so much more obvious than other parasites to everyday observation. It's as close as your nearest nigger neighborhood.
------------------------------------------
"Those who believe the Bible are those who know the least about it".
are you fighting because blacks are the weakest available victims?
Please stop with the pablum. Blacks, circa 2102, are a protected minority who have been granted spacial rights and privileges, above those of Whites, from the FedGov. To miss this is to miss the nose on your face.
guilt has nothing to do with it... it's just a matter of common sense.
whites went down the wrong path.
none of you white supremacists can admit that, and there seems to be lots of you... enough of you that you'll be successful in stirring up your race wars.
judging from the weakness of your posts, we have to assume that you know whites went down the wrong path, but you're unable to admit it, you're unable to say why you hate black people, and you're unable to come up with constructive solutions.
are you fighting because blacks are the weakest available victims?
So gangs of them attacking, robbing, raping, and murdering their white victims are the REAL victims, where the odds are at least 3 to 1 in their favor, eh?
Yeah, poor them, I guess we should just all slit our wrists and beat them to the punch so to speak, right?
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
judging from the weakness of your posts, we have to assume that you know whites went down the wrong path, but you're unable to admit it, you're unable to say why you hate black people, and you're unable to come up with constructive solutions.
My post suggested that the White kid should have been armed and then been in a position to defend himself. I'd ask you to point to other specific posts that depict me as a "White supremacist" but I fear you'd be hard pressed to find any. Am I politically correct? No. And that's by intention. That you consider that hate frankly delights me. It helps to align you with all the radical Black nationalists who have no problem advancing their interests. To folks like you, and other deep White thinkers, cultural nationalism is limited to Blacks, Hispanics, etc. and not to Whites. I ask why, and your ilk recoil. I find your tango with political correctness and White guilt delightful.
Ever attend a social gathering, people in small groups are imbibing, having pleasant, intelligent conversation?
Mr. Obnoxious joins the group and in less than five minutes the group disintegrates.
Sure, they come with an agenda and are usually incapable of reason. The next time one changes his/her mind related to additional research/information that is contrary to theirs, will be the first time.
They are the worst of both worlds; zero street smarts, coupled with intellectual dishonesty.
none of this namecalling can obscure the fact that whites have fucked things up.
their whole system is now dependent on exploiting dwindling resources, and of course the solution to that, from a traditional white philosophical standpoint, is kill people so you can control their energy resources, and deprive rivals of access to those resources.
nevermind that our prime rival had to industrialize and cause horrendous pollution so they could protect themselves from us.
and nevermind that we're putting all those combustion products back in the atmosphere, and the planet is warming up.
nevermind that we're wrecking jillions of square miles of productive land by paving the land, nevermind that the waste products of a consumer society, and the process of manufacturing consumer goods, is wrecking more land.
but if you resort to namecalling on internet forums, everything will be okay forever'n'ever, amen.
This would make for a fine academic exercise, but given that Whites are now facing a spear tip that has been honed over decades, the time for such study isn't now. The brigands are at the gate. The man who was assaulted in this article should have been armed and dispatched his assailants post haste. When enough Whites defend themselves then perhaps the assaults will slow and we can then study further why such behavior exists. As for me, I think Professor MacDonald explains the "why" very well. I posted a 'tube this AM in another thread that is well worth watching.
I do not disagree that we are at a crisis point and that the toxic black youth culture is destructive and dangerous.
My point really is that a complete handling requires knowing "why" we have this current state of affairs. This was not always the case. In the 1950's and 1960's one of the constant repeated themes from black leaders was a demand for fair and equal treatment AND to young blacks - get an education. This was the era of the United Negro College Fund and blacks were not only not cut any slack on admissions they had to excel their white counterparts to gain admission.
That all changed under "The Great Society PsyOp" which was not really aimed at equality and a fair shake but at blunting the Civil Rights Movement - which at the time was beginning to score major victory after major victory.
We know who runs Dope Inc. - CIA.
We also know from some courageous reporting who seeded dope into the anti-war movement - CIA.
There is also a lot of direct and indirect evidence that strongly suggests that a lot of the "spontaneous" youth culture was also CIA.
Ms. Magazine, admitted by Gloria Slime'em in her book, was funded initially by the CIA.
Drugs and Guns in LA? Again CIA both from Michael Ruppert and the Sacramento Bee.
So, where did Rap, particularly "Gangsta Rap" come from? That was not spontaneous - it was seeded in.
There are a lot of pieces to the puzzle but when you start assembling them they begin adding up to a set of common denominators - all are aimed at social manipulation which is apparently operating off of someone's plan. The current level of antagonism and criminality in the black community is NOT by accident but by design.
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha
and finally, we got to admit that if whites are unable to admit their mistakes and reform their behavior, they might, like the israelis, wind up destroying themselves in defense of a bad idea.
it's a sign of maturity, to admit your mistakes, and try to correct them.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
christine tried to intervene, because she knows that white suppremacism is intellectually indefensible in view of the pickle white culture has got itself into.
that doesnt change the way she feels, of course.
so is christine a white supremacist or something else?
I doubt he's out there with a bunch of his friends setting black folks on fire or beating them up. He uses words to fight his battles, not fists, bricks, gasoline, or Glocks.
So in comparison to those who DO use those things against those they hate because of their skin color, he is an Einstein.
How about you, do you think it's ok to lynch those you hate because of their skin color?
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen