[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

African Woman Protects Herself from Muggers Cafe Owner Kicked Israelis out. Then This happened The True COST of ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION explained - Edward Dowd People are just starting to understand the economic impact of illegal migration on an economy. Freight Fraud, Cargo Theft, Deadly Collisions - Ghost Carriers Are Growing National Security Threat Hamas To Release American-Israeli Hostage As Goodwill Gesture To Trump Targeted by the mind control programs of the evil ones (Pedos) Ex-CIA agent gives his take on some of America's biggest historical events... Asheville N.C. hit again. May 9th 2025 "No One is Prepared for What’s Happening in EUROPE "This loss is permanent" Daniela Cambone: The Great Taking Author Interview Polar ice rebounds confound alarmist predictions: New studies highlight climates unpredictable dance NBC: The United States, Europe and Ukraine have made a list of 22 conditions for ending the conflict President Trumps Proposal to Eliminate Income Taxes: Can It Be Done? Trump Still Does Not Understand What Russia Wants and Demands Borrell: Half of bombs dropped on Gaza supplied by Europe Surprise, Surprise: Bibi Discovers "Secret Iranian Nuclear Weapons Facility" in Iran Report: Trump Delinks Saudi Nuclear Deal from Israeli Normalization Lebanon's war-wounded and pregnant women face deepening healthcare crisis Hordes of NATO military and elite PMCs suddenly went to the Kursk region The Ukrainian Armed Forces will receive missiles for attacks on the rear, headquarters, airports of Russia Minister o Defense Thousands of corpses on the border - a French breeding ground near Kiev was destroyed Ivermectin Reverses Alzheimer's Disease 80% Of 'Liberal' Americans Want Elon Musk Thrown In Prison Why Silver is Lagging Gold Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver verbally and physically assaulted federal agents in New Jersey Diana Ross & The Supremes - Reflections [Spain TV] [1967] Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Introduces Bill to REPEAL the USA PATRIOT Act Declares War on Surveillance State Car Followed Home. Quick Thinking Driver Saved Himself

Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: "The US Air Force Shot Down Flight 93"
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/
Published: May 19, 2012
Author: http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/
Post Date: 2012-05-19 18:03:51 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 4497
Comments: 164

"The US Air Force Shot Down Flight 93" The following comment was posted to my blog today (I do not know who the author is -- he posted semi-anonymously; so decide for yourself whether or not you believe him):

"I am an Air Force veteran. I was serving at Langley AFB, Virginia on Sept. 11. (not to be confused with CIA headquarters at Langley, VA). The "Alert Squadron" of 4 F-16 Falcons also stationed at Langley AFB was scrambled AFTER the "plane" crashed into the Pentagon. Because of my position as a ground equipment mechanic, I had access to the flightline operations that day. My friends were Crew Cheifs and Weapons Loaders, among other professions on the flightline that day. One of my [unusual] duties that day was to drive a Loader (personal friend) along with a rack of live missiles (AIM-9's and AIM-120's) across the active runway to the Alert Squadron and drop them off. I was towing equipment to the flightline, so when it was time to go back and pick up the Loader (and our missile trailer) I was unable to do so, but another member of my Flight (a good friend, and later roommate) did go. According to my roommate (and I later confirmed with the Loader) the Loader was completely silent most of the trip back to our side of the base, after they crossed the active, he spoke. "They shot one down." JJ replied "WHAT?" Loader:"One of those 16's came back with one less missile than it left with" That was all. As they pulled back in to the squadron area, The loader was whisked away by his commanders for debriefing. I didn't see him for a few days, but when I did, he said he couldn't talk about it, but he confirmed that what my roommate had told me was true.

The US Air Force shot down Flight 93. I haven't told this to many people. I told my parents and other family members shortly after I left the military. They didn't believe it. I figured no one else would either. I kept my mouth shut. Everyone was dedicated to the president and the country (not really) And anything that went against the Official, media delivered story was viewed as unpatriotic. I knew that I loved this country, so I kept my mouth shut. I just can't do that anymore. I know that I don't have any documents to prove it, and I have no way of knowing where the others involved are now days, so I can't prove anything. All I have is my word. and with God as my witness that is the truth."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 150.

#4. To: tom007 (#0)

Nonsense.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-19   22:05:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Rummy also said that a missile hit the Pentagon: any doubters on that one?

Lod  posted on  2012-05-19   22:42:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Rummy also said that a missile hit the Pentagon: any doubters on that one?

Regardless of what Rummy "said" actual reality has to be accepted.

For instance, over 100 people outside the Pentagon SAW the airplane, some even identified it as AA plane.

Doubters said it was a missile. When they dragged the landing gear out with heavy equipment, they had no explanation.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-19   22:57:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

THE CLAIM THAT THE PENTAGON WAS NOT STRUCK BY A PLANE IS DELIBERATE DISINFORMATION

As can be seen by the above, there are photos which show the wreckage of the aircraft that struck the Pentagon. The claim that there was no plane that hit the Pentagon was never credible. If the plane hadn't hit the Pentagon, where had it gone? There were simply too many witnesses to the plane for it not to exist.

One of the earliest clues that this was a deliberate operation by an intelligence agency was the sheer volume of emails insisting that this issue HAD to be looked at. Sometimes the spooks betray themselves with their own heavy handedness.

So, why would anyone work so hard to try to establish such an obviously phony straw man?

The truth is that the US Government's credibility within the nation and around the world has hit an all time low. Traffic at this website has quadrupled in just the last week alone, with about 50,000 accesses per day of the main article page. The US Government has had a long history of trying to trip up critics of the government with phony planted stories, in order to discredit and embarrass them. Such certainly seems to be the case now. Government operatives have been feeding this bogus claim that there was no plane impact on the Pentagon all over the internet, while the media tries to claim that this idea is the generally accepted view of all government critics. Then, when the government hands out photos of the actual impact taken by a security camera, the same media will work hard to dismiss all critics of the government, indeed the internet community as a whole, as not worthy of serious note. Intelligence agencies call the practice "poisoning the well", and like staging fake terror attacks on ones own people to start a war, such dirty tricks have been used by governments for thousands of years. The "umbrella gun" in the House Select Committee On Assassinations was a similar operation. More recently, during open congressional hearings into public concerns about government abuse, a plant was sent in, dressed in camouflage fatigues, to scream about the secret government tornado making machines. This planted operative became the focus of the media's subsequent campaign to dismiss anyone who would be concerned over government abuse as not worthy of notice.

Have no doubt; right now there is a war being waged for the minds of America, and the internet is the high ground. The government always plays dirty, because anyone who still plays fair will be at an automatic disadvantage.

This story that the plane did not hit the Pentagon was obviously flawed, primarily because it did not account for where the uncrashed plane went off to. So, think about all the people who tried to sell you this lemon (in my case, many of the return email addresses were fakes), and recognize that they are either idiots or government stooges.

Note the timing of the phony story, appearing just at the right moment to distract attention away from the Israeli spy scandal, right when the United States, even as it tries to conceal the existence of the spy ring, rounds up the Israelis and deports them..

Even now, after more photos have been released of the plane's impact into the Pentagon, the shills are still wandering around the internet, trying to keep the "debate" going over whether there is an airplane or there isn't. The aircraft itself isn't the issue; tricking the public into paying attention to the debate is the real goal because if the public is paying attention to the various parties pretending to argue over whether there is an airplane or not, then the public is NOT paying attention to what the government spooks don't want the public paying attention to, namely the Israeli spies and their connection to the events of 9-11.

This is why, even though the claim that Flight 77 had not hit the Pentagon never explained where flight 77 went off to if it didn't hit the Pentagon, even though photos have surfaced of the aircraft debris and even though there are witnesses that saw the plane, the spooks are working even harder to try to keep this story alive; to manufacture a false debate as an attractant, because this is the only way they can control what the public is looking at, to keep the public from looking at the spy scandal and what it means that the United States Government CLASSIFIED the evidence that linked those Israeli spies to the events of 9-11.

Everyone who is still trying to keep this missing plane story alive, to manufacture a controversy where none really exists, to distract from the Israel spy scandal, is either an idiot or working for the governments of the United States and of Israel.

www.oilempire.us/bogus.html

www.foreignpolicyjournal....e-pentagon-attack-on-911/

whatreallyhappened.com/WR...hoax.html?q=hunthoax.html

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2012-05-20   16:50:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Everyone who is still trying to keep this missing plane story alive, to manufacture a controversy where none really exists, to distract from the Israel spy scandal, is either an idiot or working for the governments of the United States and of Israel.

The first report that a plane hit the Pentagon was from the pilot of a AC130 that saw the plane, saw it hit and he reported it immediately....ALL OF THAT IS ON FAA TAPE...

On youtube there is a video interview with the pilot. There were of course other crew members that saw the same thing.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-20   19:01:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Question is, what was that C-130 doing in a no fly zone?

Obnoxicated  posted on  2012-05-20   22:48:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Question is, what was that C-130 doing in a no fly zone?

The C-130 was under positive ATC control at all times.

The Pentagon is so huge that in good weather it can be seen from many miles away at even low altitude.

On the tape, the controller tells the 130 he has an approaching unidentified aircraft. C-130 pilot sees the other aircraft hit the Pentagon and is the first one to report it.

There is an excellent video of an interview later with the pilot on youtube,

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-21   7:32:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Where are all the surveillance videos of the event, ie. Virginia DOT traffic cams, Pentagon roof cams, etc.?

Oh wait, we have the Doubletree Hotel surveillance video, which shows an explosion but no plane. So where is all this evidence Cyni?

Or how about the CNN video which shows little to no indication of a plane having hit the Pentagon, where there are no jet fuel fires on the outside walls of the Pentagon whereas there WOULD have been huge fires there if a 757's wings had splattered into them. Instead, there were only isolated fires in the immediate area of the "hole" caused by whatever hit the Pentagon, and it did not encompass the area where the wings should have, or rather WOULD have hit had it been a 757.

And one other thing. Notice the Pentagon lawn towards the end of the above video? It is spotless. There is a team of individuals exiting a bus however, with bags full of "something", heading towards the Pentagon...

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-05-21   15:28:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2012-05-21   16:15:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#152. To: Eric Stratton (#150)

Check out the view of the horizon in the a.m.

It all would have been on there!

And that's why that video hasn't seen the light of day. They're probably waiting until they can make a PERFECT fake, where they can't quite get it right yet.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-05-21 16:18:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]