[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: The Authoritarian Mind Yet another Afghan family (and a bakery in Pakistan) is extinguished by an airstrike: unleash the justifications The Authoritarian Mind Yet another Afghan family (and a bakery in Pakistan) is extinguished by an airstrike: unleash the justifications By Glenn Greenwald 220 261 more The Authoritarian MindMore than 1,500 Afghans block the highway between Kabul and Kandahar in Seed Abad, Wardak province, Afghanistan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Credit: AP/Rahmatullah Nikzad) (updated below – Update II) Yesterday, I wrote about the rotted workings of the Imperial Mind, but today presents a tragic occasion to examine its close, indispensable cousin: the Authoritarian Mind. From CNN today: A suspected NATO airstrike killed eight civilians — including six children — in eastern Afghanistan, a provincial spokesman said. The airstrike took place Saturday night in Paktia province, said Rohullah Samoon, spokesman for the governor of Paktia. He said an entire family was killed in the strike. The LA Times identified the victims as “Mohammed Shafi, his wife and his six children,” and cited the statements from the spokesman for the Paktia governor’s office that “there is no evidence that Shafi was a Taliban insurgent or linked with Al Qaeda.” The Afghan spokesman blamed the incident on the refusal of NATO to coordinate strikes with Afghan forces to ensure civilians are not targeted (“If they had shared this with us, this wouldn’t have happened”). Also yesterday: An American drone fired two missiles at a bakery in northwest Pakistan Saturday, killing four suspected militants, officials said, as the U.S. pushed ahead with its drone campaign despite Pakistani demands to stop. This was the third such strike in the country in less than a week. . . . The officials said the victims were buying goods from a bakery when the missiles hit. Residents were still removing the debris, officials said. All of the dead were foreigners, but the officials did not have any information on their identities or nationalities. All of this is so widely tolerated, even cheered, among large factions of the American citizenry due to three premises: (1) I have absolutely no idea who my government is continuously bombing to death by drone, but I assume they deserve it; (2) when my government extinguishes the lives of entire families, including small children, as it often does, I know it’s all for a just and important cause even if I can’t identify it; and, (3) we have to stop the Terrorists, because they keep killing innocent civilians. That’s the Authoritarian Mind, and it appears everywhere the Imperial Mind does. * * * * * The Washington Post yesterday reported that “on the periphery of Bagram Airfield, farmers, scrap-metal collectors and sheep herders have been crippled, blinded and burned by U.S. military ammunition on an unfenced and poorly marked training ground.” Because “there is no barrier between nearby villages and the range — it is unclear where the dusty townships end and the vast military training area begins,” Afghan villagers routinely stumble into unexploded ordnance and are severely injured or even killed, all because the U.S. military never bothered to demarcate the base. In 2009, its Commander-in-Chief, President Barack Obama, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. UPDATE: This contrast from MSNBC’s home page, as it appears right now, speaks volumes about the mindset of the American government and its establishment media: For why this is exactly the reverse of what a responsible U.S. media outlet would do, see here. 2.bp.blogspot.com/-kOPxVJ...%2BFear%2BMust%2BEnd.tiff UPDATE II: ABC News‘ Jake Tapper this morning interviewed Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and asked him about civilian deaths caused by U.S. drones: specifically, whether the U.S.’s relentless air strikes in multiple Muslim countries are exacerbating rather than containing the problem of anti-American Terrorism: TAPPER: President Obama recently said that — recently told John Brennan, his counterterrorism adviser at the White House that he wanted a little bit more transparency when it comes to drones, which are the – is one of the approaches that you’re alluding to in Yemen. And “The Times of London” reported last week that the civilian casualties in Yemen as a result of drone strikes have, quote, “emboldened Al Qaeda.” Is there not a serious risk that this approach to counterterrorism, because of its imprecision, because of its civilian casualties, is creating more enemy than it is killing? PANETTA: First and foremost, I think this is one of the most precise weapons that we have in our arsenal. Number two, what is our responsibility here? Our responsibility is to defend and protect the United States of America. And using the operations that we have, using the systems that we have, using the weapons that we have, is absolutely essential to our ability to defend Americans. That’s what counts, and that’s what we’re doing. Note that Panetta studiously ignored, rather than addressed, the question of whether the U.S. — by continuously killing Muslim civilians and thus intensifying anti-American animus — is creating more Terrorists than it is killing and thus making the U.S. less safe. That’s because there is no answer. Continuously bombing Muslim countries and killing civilians ostensibly as a means of combating anti-American Terrorism is exactly like smoking six packs of cigarettes a day to treat emphysema: one would do it only if one wanted to make the problem worse, or, at best, was recklessly indifferent to the outcome. Permalink Print Short URL Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#1. To: tom007 (#0)
And all we have to do is select Oromney and this will all end? Somehow I suspect not.
That is not the point and you know it. The point is that people are complacently accepting greater and greater evil under the phony banner of fighting terrorism. What is going on is murder pure and simple. Stripped of the covering hogwash innocent men women and children are being murdered under a pretense which is nothing more than cover for another hidden agenda. A hidden agenda which not only allows but supports the foulest of crimes and then people set back and defend the indefensible comforted by the lies they are trying desperately to believe because the alternative is to accept responsibility for crimes worse than are supposedly being fought. As we watch freedom, decency, and honor fade slowly into the sunset and the darkness descends all we have are people wrapped in their comforting lies.
The point is that people are complacently accepting greater and greater evil under the phony banner of fighting terrorism. Correct. One problem however, we cannot seem to find anyone interested in ending these endless wars. Ron Paul was the last and only hope. Ron was military, Oromney and Obongo had better things to do, so endless wars are going to be our future. For several months now Obongo has been switching gears from the Middle East to Asia and China. We are hemming them in on three sides. Geo politics is an interesting pastime.
There are no replies to Comment # 3. End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||