[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?

"Hitler Survived WW2 And I Brought Proof" Norman Ohler STUNS Joe Rogan

CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: The president is supposed find us jobs.
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 4, 2012
Author: me
Post Date: 2012-06-04 03:35:25 by titorite
Keywords: None
Views: 714
Comments: 30

I was listening to Beyond the Beltway with Bruce DuMont today. HIm and his were bashing the hell outta obama saying he couldn't run on his record and thats why he attacks romney ... He went on to say that the economy is the most important issue in this election (NO ITS NOT IT IS ALL THE FUCKING WARS WE KEEP DECLARING THAT IS THE BIG FUCKING ISSUE!!!! FUCK US MAKE IT STOP FUCK SYRIA!!! DO NOT INVADE ANOTHER FUCKING COUNTRY!!!)

Pardon me.

Anyways.

He was saying that it "was the presidents job to find americans jobs" , He then went on to belittle Obummer for not finding enough americans work.

I don't know about you but I loath working for others and Love working for myself and I can only do that if I find my own job rather than relying on the magical man on hill. COme to think of it, I can not remember even on president in all my life ever helping me get a job! Am I entitled to some kind of reparations for that?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

#1. To: titorite (#0)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2012-06-04   10:19:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Eric Stratton (#1)

My 10-year old son, who can pass every high school reading exam thrown his way, told me that one of the neighborhood kids told him that they now allow texting vernacular for essays.

Language always changes, this is normal. We don't speak or write anything like they did in the 1500s in England, but we still have the same language, it just changes over the years. I have no problem with language changing, as long as I can understand what is being communicated.

RickyJ  posted on  2012-06-05   1:20:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: RickyJ (#9) (Edited)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2012-06-05   9:03:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Eric Stratton (#11)

Language changes, but grammar does not.

Wot ye not that grammaire changeth? (Or is it, Wotest thou not?)

randge  posted on  2012-06-05   10:21:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: randge (#15)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2012-06-05   14:03:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Eric Stratton (#19)

Au contraire.

There are at least three grammatical diffences between that and "Don't you know that grammar changes?" aside from the lexical changes.

1) Question formation through inversion instead of do-support, 2) Changes in pronoun morphology, 3) Reduced verb inflections.

The reason that you can read this sentence is that you are so familiar with the King James that reading this sentence is cake to you. The changes that have taken place in the last 500 years are barely apparent to the literate sometimes.

randge  posted on  2012-06-05   14:56:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: randge (#21)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2012-06-05   18:08:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Eric Stratton (#22)

I think I get your drift.

Descriptively, grammar is what ever rules speakers and listeners, readers and writers agree on, for lack of which they would be at a loss to make sense to one another. Prescriptively, grammar is a set of standards for the use of those rules enforced by the puh-fessors in a vain attempt to stem the inevitable tides of change that keep moving the pebbles around on the beach.

The Chinese speak without tenses, the passive, conditionals, endings - entire chunks of the apparatus that we are wont to call grammar. They get along well with out it and have for thousands of years.

God knows what English will sound like in one hundred years.

randge  posted on  2012-06-05   18:26:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: randge (#23)

Mexican Ebonics at the rate we're going.

Lod  posted on  2012-06-05   18:49:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Lod (#24)

That is not unlikely.

The Anglo-Saxons would have called what we speak French Ebonics.

randge  posted on  2012-06-05   19:19:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 25.

        There are no replies to Comment # 25.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]