[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Fury in Memphis after attempted murder suspect who ambushed FedEx employee walks free without bail

Tehran preparing for attack against Israel: Ayatollah Khamenei's aide

Huge shortage plagues Israeli army as losses mount in Lebanon, Gaza

Researchers Find Unknown Chemical In Drinking Water Posing "Potential Human Health Concern"

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria

Donald Trump Indirectly Exposes the Jewish Neocons Behind Joe Biden's Nuclear War


Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: Rand Paul officially endorses Mitt Romney on Hannity Show (!) 6/7/12)
Source: .
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c5odNzKVbk
Published: Jun 8, 2012
Author: ,
Post Date: 2012-06-08 00:46:04 by Artisan
Keywords: None
Views: 1881
Comments: 100


Poster Comment:

Wow.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

#25. To: Artisan (#0)

So much for the theory that Rand will be the benefactor of the Freedom movement dad is building.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2012-06-08   10:11:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Jethro Tull, Phant2000, Christine, Rubes (#25)

So much for the theory that Rand will be the benefactor of the Freedom movement dad is building.

Ron Paul made a deal with the devil, Rand will be the beneficiary.

That "deal" was consummated many months ago.

Anyone shifting their allegiance to Rand is making a huge mistake.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-06-08   10:22:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Cynicom (#27)

For your theory to hold true, Rand would have to be Romney's VP, or be given a power position in his potential cabinet. I seriously doubt that the Establishment Pubes want anything to do with RPs folks, most of whom won't be bothering to support Romney.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2012-06-08   10:26:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Jethro Tull (#30)

I seriously doubt that the Establishment Pubes want anything to do with RPs folks

I think it's likely that that the Establishment Pukes will try to throw them some kind of bone. Unless they can rip 'Bama a major hemorrhage between now and November, they'll need the damn votes.

But Rand Paul is not on anybody's short list and that list is depressing reading. It's like being orphaned for the holidays by your folks and you get to pick which drunk uncle you're gonna stay with. Come to think of it, I'd rather hang out with my drunk uncle that spend the summer with someone like Rob Portman.

randge  posted on  2012-06-08   10:44:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: randge (#32)

I think it's likely that that the Establishment Pukes will try to throw them some kind of bone

I'm guessing you are also a supporter of RP? If so randge, is there any bone the Establishment could throw us (save refusing to send kids off to unconstitutional wars) that could appease us? I can't think of one besides what I just mentioned.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2012-06-08   10:50:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Jethro Tull, Randge (#34)

I think it's likely that that the Establishment Pukes will try to throw them some kind of bone

I'm guessing you are also a supporter of RP? If so randge, is there any bone the Establishment could throw us (save refusing to send kids off to unconstitutional wars) that could appease us?

Let's boil our bones. It now boils down to Goode or Johnson.....Rand hopping on the RINO bandwagon to tour the nation solidifies our choices.

abraxas  posted on  2012-06-08   11:00:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 39.

#47. To: abraxas (#39) (Edited)

Let's boil our bones. It now boils down to Goode or Johnson.....Rand hopping on the RINO bandwagon to tour the nation solidifies our choices.

I'm not even going to bother to vote. Not only won't they win, we'll be lucky if anyone pays attention to the miniscule vote totals that they get. Write in Ron Paul? No one will count that. A bigger statement will be made by being registered to vote but abstaining to do so. Low voter turnouts is something that the media and both wings of the party pay attention to.

Neither Mitt nor Obama will save the country, it is toast. But if Obama's re-election destroys the sham of the GOP and the two party farce there will be some satisfaction in that. If Romney wins, the illusion continues, and fools on both sides will say "Just wait until 2016!"

PnbC  posted on  2012-06-08 11:20:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]