[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Ron Paul See other Ron Paul Articles Title: Rand Paul Revealed, along with Youtube tinkering As Senator Rand Paul officially endorsed big-government Keynesian warmonger Mitt Romney, and revealed his complete capitulation to the political elite, the youtube video of Rand's appearance on the Sean Hannity show clearly revealed Google's fraudulent and deceptive manipulation of video views. At 8:50 Pacific time, the video was listed as having only 302 views yet at the same time had 614 dislikes and 527 comments. [See screenshot here]. Several hours later, the video still showed 302 views with 708 dislikes. Romney, a zionist puppet who represents everything that Ron Paul and Paul supporters oppose, stated in an official press release that he was "honored to have earned the endorsement of Rand Paul" and that he "look(s) forward to working with him to get America back on the right track." Chaos ensued on Ron Paul forums such as the DailyPaul, with one user posting the following sentiment about Rand, the likes of which was apparently shared by many others who not only would never support Romney, but vowed to withdraw any future support for Rand as well as the Campaign for Liberty: "Traitor disgusting filth - Judas Benedict Arnold should be ashamed of having been brought up by the parents he did & turning out like this." A strange series of events brought the culmination of the libertarian icon's political career, with his own son endorsing his idealogical opposite. In 2010, Rand came out and publicly opposed a mosque near ground zero, a position at odds with his father Ron which was mocked by the Weekly Standard. In September 2010, Rand met privately with PNAC member Bill Kristol and other neocons in Washington. [See also here, here and here.] As early as March 2012, with Ron Paul supposedly still in the race, TIME Magazine published an article titled Why Ron Paul May Cut a Deal with Mitt Romney, in which Paul's own campaign chairman Jesse Benton said "Paul might also be enticed ...by the prospect of serving as a presidential adviser, a Cabinet position for someone in his orbit or "perhaps a vice presidency." Not for himself, but rather his son." On Wednesday May 9, Ron Paul had a secret breakfast with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, stating "it was off the record". Exactly two weeks later, Rand Paul had a private 30 minute meeting with Mitt Romney on Wednesday May 23 in Washington. Coincidentally, that very same day, Rand went on Fox News and said that Romney "would be precisely the one you would want to turn around your country,", a bizarre remark which evoked shock and outrage from many of Ron Paul's loyal supporters. In his Romney endorsement, Rand told Hannity that he would indeed campaign for Romney and referenced their May 23 meeting in Washington, ending the interview with a vote of confidence in Romney's foreign policy ideas: In reality, the evidence shows quite the opposite- far from advocating a careful non-interventionist foreign policy, Romney's public record reveals a hawkish agenda. Romney vowed to increase defense spending by $2.1 trillion dollars and advocated immediate entanglement with the Israel-Iran conflict. In a speech to AIPAC in March, Romney said "Israel does not need public lectures about how to weigh decisions of war and peace. It needs our support." Romney is old friends with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and has even said that if were president, he would ask the Israeli "What would you like me to do?" In a 2009 OpEd, Romney wrote In a more recent OpEd about the same topic, Romney wrote Ron Paul himself disappointed many supporters in the past such as when he effectively ended his 2008 presidential campaign with the so-called Trotsky memo, as well as his capitulation on the absurd government story regarding the false flag September 11th attacks. Hopefully good people across the country won't be dissuaded by this political theatre and will continue to fight for liberty despite Ron Paul's retirement and his son's disgraceful act. As Daniel Webster said, "God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it". Martin Hill is a Catholic paleoconservative and civil rights advocate. His work has been featured on LewRockwell.com, WhatReallyHappened, Infowars, PrisonPlanet, National Motorists Association, WorldNetDaily, The Orange County Register, KNBC4 Los Angeles, Los Angeles Catholic Lay Mission Newspaper, KFI 640, The Press Enterprise, Antiwar.com, IamtheWitness.com, FreedomsPhoenix, Rense, BlackBoxVoting, and many others. Archives can be found at LibertyFight.com Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
#1. To: Artisan, Jethro Tull, Christine, Phant2000, randge, Esso (#0)
Ron Paul was NEVER RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT. Ron Paul was running for Rand Paul for President. Anyone that did not see that months ago was not paying attention. Die hard Ron Paul supporters need to realize that they have been conned one more time. Instead of admitting what was and is apparent, they strike out at anyone that did not follow the herd over the cliff.
I listened to that interview last night and could do nothing but smile ... actually, it was a sneer. How many were fooled by the campaigning of Ron AND his son. Not until the American voters pick their own candidate will the ruse ever change. The way we have allowed the process to develop only ensures that the powerful get to name the winner, not the voters.
I truly understand the well deserved cynicism. However, until we all determine to walk away from the current FEDERAL RESERVE BANKSTER GOVERNMENT - whining will have to suffice !
We have had the Fed Res now for one hundred years. Ninety per cent of Americans have not a clue as to what that is and could care less. The patriotic voters will go to the polls in November, 125 million strong and rubber stamp this corrupt system. Vote and you are part of the system.
I quit voting 3 years ago and will never vote again.
#23. To: sizzlerguy (#5)
I last voted in 1972 (for Nixon).
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||
