Title: The Rand Paul Fiasco with Webster Tarpley Source:
PrisonPlanetTV URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4MahRKtM5s&feature=player_embedded Published:Jun 12, 2012 Author:PrisonPlanetTV Post Date:2012-06-12 17:43:49 by randge Keywords:Webster, Tarpley, Paul debacle Views:406 Comments:29
The Paulists have failed us. That party is over. They are shoveling up the confetti as we speak. Now is the time to open up our eyes to new dimensions and perspectives and follow fresh ideas wherever they may lead.
open up our eyes to new dimensions and perspectives and follow fresh ideas wherever they may lead
Tarpley offers no fresh ideas.
Let me ask you this: If the other dupes who represent the people were voting for no tax increases like Ron Paul consistently voted during his tenure, would we have the tyranny, the wars, and the massive debt that we have now?
No, we would not.
Tarpley is grossly exaggerating the "Brutal Savage Austerity" aspect of cutting this warmongering, empire striving, freedom robbing government down to size. He never even bothers to discuss the massive debt that is to be passed onto future generations after he is long gone and enjoyed his Social Security and Medicare benefits.
Tarpley ignores that the more taxes that are paid the more irresponsibly the money is spent. The more we the people subsidize what we deplore with every dime that is extorted from us. We get more waste and an ever larger central government that marches toward tyranny.
Tarpley advises turning away from Reps and Dems while back biting Libertarians, and the Libertarian Party is the ONLY party alternative that is on the ballot in all fifty states. The candidate on that ticket has PROVEN that he can balance a budget and get a fiscal house in order without the death of even one citizen in his state. Johnson also placed term limits on himself as promised.
Tarpley's endless Ron Paul ranting without ever mentioning his principled stance for liberty or freedom and against excessive taxation speak volumes to me. And Tarpley never gets to the heart of the matter. It is the excessive taxation and the endless money pit given to the central government that has given this nation what Tarpley claims to despise: the two party fraud.
I'd like to give more liberty and less taxation a try, not continue to buy into the farce that the government will save us all. Tarpley loves to talk about the New Deal and the good it did while ignoring that every person in this nation under 45 who has been forced to pay into the Social Security system will never see a dime of it! Let's be honest, there will likely be no Medicare or Medicaid either. All that will be left is the mountain of debt that Tarpley likes to ignore.
That's my two cents. Tarpley isn't a leader that I would follow, although I often enjoy his analysis on various topics.
Tarpley offers what are in a sense very old ideas, but from my perspective, they are worth a fresh look. I am taking a fresh look at everything these days.
Venice’s War Against Western Civilization
« Against Oligarchy – Table of Contents
Appeared in Fidelio, Summer 1995
The British royal family of today typifies the Venetian Party, and continues the outlook and methods of an oligarchical faction which can be traced far back into the ancient world. Oligarchism is a principle of irrational domination associated with hereditary oligarchy/ nobility and with certain aristocratic priesthoods. At the center of oligarchy is the idea that certain families are born to rule as an arbitrary elite, while the vast majority of any given population is condemned to oppression, serfdom, or slavery. During most of the past 2,500 years, oligarchs have been identified by their support for the philosophical writings of Aristotle and their rejection of the epistemology of Plato. Aristotle asserted that slavery is a necessary institution, because some are born to rule and others to be ruled. He also reduced the question of human knowledge to the crudest sense certainty and perception of “facts.” Aristotle’s formalism is a means of killing human creativity, and therefore represents absolute evil. This evil is expressed by the bestialist view of the oligarchs that human beings are the same as animals.
Oligarchs identify wealth purely in money, and practice usury, monetarism, and looting at the expense of technological advancement and physical production. Oligarchs have always been associated with the arbitrary rejection of true scientific discovery and scientific method in favor of open anti-science or more subtle obscurantist pseudo-science. The oligarchy has believed for millennia that the earth is overpopulated; the oligarchical commentary on the Trojan War was that this conflict was necessary in order to prevent greater numbers of mankind from oppressing “Mother Earth.” The oligarchy has constantly stressed race and racial characteristics, often as a means for justifying slavery. In international affairs, oligarchs recommend such methods as geopolitics, understood as the method of divide and conquer which lets one power prevail by playing its adversaries one against the other. Oligarchical policy strives to maintain a balance of power among such adversaries for its own benefit, but this attempt always fails in the long run and leads to new wars.
The essence of oligarchism is summed up in the idea of the empire, in which an elite identifying itself as a master race rules over a degraded mass of slaves or other oppressed victims. If oligarchical methods are allowed to dominate human affairs, they always create a breakdown crisis of civilization, with economic depression, war, famine, plague, and pestilence. Examples of this are the fourteenth century Black Plague crisis and the Thirty Years War (1618-48), both of which were created by Venetian intelligence. The post- industrial society and the derivatives crisis have brought about the potential for a new collapse of civilization in our own time. This crisis can only be reversed by repudiating in practice the axioms of the oligarchical mentality.
A pillar of the oligarchical system is the family fortune, or fondo as it is called in Italian. The continuity of the family fortune which earns money through usury and looting is often more important than the biological continuity across generations of the family that owns the fortune. In Venice, the largest fondo was the endowment of the Basilica of St. Mark, which was closely associated with the Venetian state treasury, and which absorbed the family fortunes of nobles who died without heirs. This fondo was administered by the procurers of St. Mark, whose position was one of the most powerful under the Venetian system. Around this central fondo were grouped the individual family fortunes of the great oligarchical families, such as the Mocenigo, the Cornaro, the Dandolo, the Contarini, the Morosini, the Zorzi, and the Tron. Until the end of the eighteenth century, the dozen or so wealthiest Venetian families had holdings comparable or superior to the very wealthiest families anywhere in Europe. When the Venetian oligarchy transferred many of its families and assets to northern Europe, the Venetian fondi provided the nucleus of the great Bank of Amsterdam, which dominated Europe during the seventeenth century, and of the Bank of England, which became the leading bank of the eighteenth century....
I do not disagree with the analysis of the Oligarchical system, but it continues unabated. We had this analysis in 1995, but what is the solution? Over in England, the people are robbed of their wealth while they rally for the Queenies multi million dollar jubilee, much like an Obama campaign meet n' greet. : )
Oligarchy, synarchy, whatever has spread roots and sprouted branches into the fabric of virtually every field of belief. That includes and is not limited to libertarianism.
Right now I'm with Yossarian. I'm armed and walking backwards. You never know where the bastards are coming from.
Yossarian was going absent without official leave with Milo, who, as the plane cruised toward Rome, shook his head reproachfully and, with pious lips pulsed, informed Yossarian in ecclesiastical tones that he was ashamed of him. Yossarian nodded. Yossarian was making an uncouth spectacle of himself by walking around backward with his gun on his hip and refusing to fly more combat missions, Milo said. Yossarian nodded. It was disloyal to his squadron and embarrassing to his superiors. He was placing Milo in a very uncomfort able position, too. Yossarian nodded again. The men were starting to grumble. It was not fair for Yossarian to think only of his own safety while men like Milo, Colonel Cathcart , Colonel Korn and ex-P.F.C. Wintergreen were willing to do everything they could to win the war. The men with seventy missions were starting to grumble because they had to fly eighty, and there was a danger some of them might put on guns and begin walking around backward, too. Morale was deteriorating and it was all Yossarian’s fault. The country was in peril; he was jeopardizing his traditional rights of freedom and independence by daring to exercise them.
Right now I'm with Yossarian. I'm armed and walking backwards. You never know where the bastards are coming from.
I like that.
I was a PNC in the military, but I did my job so that no other social misfit had to take my place. I was called a poor "sojer" by a lifer, wore that badge with honor. Sold my dress uniforms to a lifer for beer money, such is called a non conformist these days.