Title: Why Rand Paul was wrong to endorse Mitt Romney & Jack Hunter is a statist (Adam Kokesh) Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jun 13, 2012 Author:. Post Date:2012-06-13 16:10:24 by christine Keywords:None Views:693 Comments:38
rand paul asked about iran sanctions - he says that economic sanctions are not an act of war, but rather are intended to prevent war. and asked about bilderberg, to which he replies 'no comment'.
one thought about iran sanctions intended to prevent war. this means that rand thinks that without sanctions, there will be a war. for what reason? nukes? which iran has none, so why would we need sanctions and why would there be war? the guy is a loon and his apologists, of which i think there are few, should wake up. also, note that he surrily demands of the questioner who are you with.
“I would rather my enemy’s sword pierce my heart then my friend’s dagger stab me in the back.” Faustus
Bill O Rights says: Putting an amendment on a sanction bill that says, ‘this is not an act of war’, fits right into the Libya bombings as a humanitarian ‘kinetic military action’. Orwellian NewSpeak bullshit. Sanctions are economic war actions by definition.
Rand is a sellout and Ron was disengenuous with his supporters, telling them that they would win with delegate count and pandering for more dollars, not calling voter fraud in Maine, etc.
The beltway is so corrupt that it’s impossible to hold office and not get dirty. It’s a meatgrinder.
captain obvious says: screw the pauls.
4 years ago: “thanks for the moneybombs truthers, 911 wasnt an inside job, I’m off to write a book, seeya!”
this time: no fight against blatant vote fraud in so many states, “ooh lets go for delegates”, then he lets his son do the backstab sabotage crap.
how many millions have these JACKASSES raked us for?!!