Title: Did Texas Change Their Rules And Unbind All Delegates?! Source:
YouTube URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUvNG6lxhg4 Published:Jun 12, 2012 Author:matlarson10 Post Date:2012-06-14 20:46:46 by GreyLmist Keywords:Ron Paul 2012, Texas Convention, Delegates, Unbound Views:890 Comments:5
Sure they did, all part of Texas' secret plan to nominate Ron Paul.
They only refused to vote for him to throw us all off the scent.
One problem though - private monitors are suggesting that the vote was flipped. In informal exit polls as many as 66% said they were coming to vote for Ron Paul and yet he only received 12% of the vote. Interesting how that works.
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha
One problem though - private monitors are suggesting that the vote was flipped. In informal exit polls as many as 66% said they were coming to vote for Ron Paul and yet he only received 12% of the vote. Interesting how that works.
Ron Paul won in Romney's home State of Massachusettes. GOP payback: Steal Ron Paul's home State of Texas and give it to Romney.
Many of us cheered when Santorum and Romney's relatives supported the Constitution by supporting Ron Paul. GOP payback: Sway Rand Paul to support Romney before the Tampa convention, even though he's not the nominee because no delegates have voted for him yet at all. Extra whammy: Rand making that career-move over to Romney beforehand would appear to be an early Father's Day gesture of distancing on his part, in addition to fragmenting the Ron Paul movement.
Ron Paul is the Choice of the Troops and not Neocons. GOP payback: Advise Rand to be Neocon-friendly so he won't work against them and their War manuevers, etc., as much as his father has.
At a private office in Dupont Circle, he talked foreign policy with Bill Kristol, Dan Senor, and Tom Donnelly, three prominent neocons who'd been part of an effort to defeat him during the primary. "He struck me as genuinely interested in trying to understand why people like us were so apoplectic," Senor says of their two-hour encounter. "He wanted to get educated about our problem with him. He wasn't confrontational, and he wasn't disagreeable. He didn't seem cemented in his views. He was really in absorption mode."
The following month, he met with officials from the powerful lobbying group AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee),
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Rand was elected by the Paul supporters and their money. The Palin endorsement probably helped him with credibility as a political novice.
But he almost certainly had more Tea support in KY than Ron Paul support.
He has to try to represent all of those voters.
He keeps stirring the post in the Senate, forcing votes. That is something his dad could never do in the House.
Somehow, Rand representing the voters of KY and introducing bills that the neocons and big-government types loathe and forcing them to vote on those bills gets decoded by some malcontents and born-losers as a sign that he is a neocon.
There are plenty of actual neocons in the Senate that don't even get called that by the same people who are now plastering Rand with it.
I begin to think that the actual neocons have infiltrated the Liberty movement to start this huge fight over Rand in order to destroy the Liberty movement.