See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Michigan Judge Karen Khalil sends man to jail for 30 days for remaining silent when seated in the courtroom - Retaliation?
Source:
http://www.lawlessamerica.com
URL Source: http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index ... =120%3Anews-reports&Itemid=222
Published: Jun 18, 2012
Author: William Michael Windsor
Post Date: 2012-06-18 11:55:45 by freepatriot32
Ping List: *Jack-Booted Thugs* Subscribe to *Jack-Booted Thugs*
Keywords: Michigan Judge, Karen Khalil, jail, jackbooted thugs
Views: 317
Comments: 20
Michigan Judge Karen Khalil sends man to jail for 30 days for remaining silent when seated in the courtroom. The man refused to give his name, but he is one of the "founders" of LawlessAmerica.com. Judge Karen Khalil is a corrupt judge who must be removed from office, indicted, arrested, convicted, imprisoned, disgraced, and impeached. On June 8, 2012 A Novi, Michigan man was ordered by Judge Karen Kahlil of Michigan's 17th District Court to spend up to 30 days in jail for refusing to disclose his name. While sitting quietly observing a friend’s property rights case, Judge Karen Kahlil demanded he stand and disclose his name. Other witnesses were shocked when the judge ordered him arrested for refusing to disclose his name. He was cited with contempt, handcuffed, and hauled off to the Redford Police jail and later transferred to a Midland County jail. He, along with four other court observers were ordered to stand and give their names, but only the Novi man was arrested and jailed. Prior to Friday’s arrest, the Novi man had a criminal complaint, judicial misconduct, malfeasance of office, and deprivation of rights charges filed against Judge Karen Kahlil, and it is suspected that she was using her authority in retaliation for his legal action against her. He has commenced a hunger strike. The courtwatchers witnessed the court officials assault the Novi man. When one of the courtwatchers attempted to leave the room, he was detained against his will. The court officers used threat and intimidation to hold the entire body of courtwatchers hostage. Judge Karen Kahlil, in an uncontrollable rage, began to call out, “We got a group of Moors in here!” She continued her comments toward the courtwatchers “Are you a part of that group? Who here is a part of that group the Moors group?” The actions of Judge Karen Khalil are worse than outrageous. She is a criminal who must be removed from office, idicted, convicted, and imprisoned for what she has done in this and other cases. Judge Karen Khalil is a corrupt judge. The victim in this matter will be part of the movie, LawlessAmerica.
Subscribe to *Jack-Booted Thugs*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.
#11. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
Flagrant and obvious retaliation by an obviously sick and sinister witch sitting on the bench. Couldn't she control herself for a couple of days and have one of the police chiefs in her District arrange to plant some drugs on 'em?
I don't see how it could be retaliation when she didn't know who he was. His refusal to identify himself was a contempt of court. For all that the judge knew, he could have been a witness who was supposed to be sequestered from the pending trial. By the way, her full name is Karen Khalil Bouzas. As this is Michigan, I suspect she is of Arabian ancestry.
"Prior to Friday’s arrest, the Novi man had a criminal complaint, judicial misconduct, malfeasance of office, and deprivation of rights charges filed against Judge Karen Kahlil, and it is suspected that she was using her authority in retaliation for his legal action against her." Just because she asked him his name doesn't mean she didn't know who he was. It's likely she recognized him if he has charges filed against her, don't you think?
#20. To: wudidiz (#15)
(Edited)
If he filed any papers against her, then maybe the file clerk had seen his face and connected it with a name (maybe not even that, the person who brought the papers in could just as easily have been some disinterested messenger), but the judge herself probably had not seen him before nor connected his face with his name or with his filings. And, yes, refusing to answer questions is a contempt. So far we have one and only one version of these events. A fuller account may be very helpful.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestRetaliation?
#14. To: sizzlerguy (#11)
#15. To: Shoonra (#14)
I don't see how it could be retaliation when she didn't know who he was.
Replies to Comment # 15. Just because she asked him his name doesn't mean she didn't know who he was. It's likely she recognized him if he has charges filed against her, don't you think?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.